VJ Edgecombe · Court Sentiment

Verdict

16.5%34.1%49.4%

16.5%Negative683 comments

34.1%Neutral1,414 comments

49.4%Positive2,045 comments

+33Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=4,142 comments about VJ EdgecombeUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about VJ Edgecombe, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.OKC flair
Holy Edgecombe fell off a cliff
Post · [NBA] Kia Rookie Ladder: Cooper Flagg, Cedric Coward gain ground in chase to top▲ 152Nov 26, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.PHI flair
Trust me, we're all counting the days until VJ gets attacked by a rabid llama or some shit
Post · Sixers Backcourt Today: Maxey and VJ combined for 40 points at the half▲ 27Oct 28, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
VJ isn’t even in the discussion. He’s closer to the 8th best rookie than he is to the top 2. He’s barely a replacement level player and has negative BPM.
Post · [Highlight] Kon Knueppel knocks down his 200th 3-pointer of his rookie season, only to come right back down on the next possession and drain his 201st. He's the second rookie to reach the mark, and entered the night leading the NBA in 3PM.▲ 12Feb 25, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about VJ Edgecombe that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about VJ Edgecombe, his own 76ers fans are 15% negative, rival fans 16%, unflaired commenters 18%. Among the 3 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Knicks fans are hardest on him at 20% negative and Lakers fans kindest at 61% positive.

14.7%Own fansPHI flair · 836 comments

16.3%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,869 comments

17.8%Unflairedno flair · 1,437 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about VJ Edgecombe are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

VJ Edgecombe was talked about most in the game threads: 1,561 of his 4,142 comments, +29 net sentiment against +33 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, +20 on 7% of his comments; his warmest the post-game threads, +49 on 10% of his comments.

Game threads38% of his comments19.748.91,561

Post-game threads10% of his commentsWarmest12.360.9399

Front page29% of his comments15.246.81,219

Highlights14% of his comments13.354.5594

News7% of his commentsHarshest16.836.5310

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about VJ Edgecombe; left out here: Daily chat thread (43), Injury posts (7), Lowlights (3), Discussion posts (2). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about VJ Edgecombe ran between 8% and 27%. His worst week was the week of Mar 16, 30% negative of 56 comments; his best the week of Dec 29, 61% positive. 15 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 12% negative · 45% positive · 42 comments
- L vs NYK 84–99
- L vs NYK 104–113
Oct 13 · 29 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIN 126–110
Oct 20 · 13% negative · 56% positive · 330 comments
- W @ BOS 117–116
- W vs CHA 125–121
Oct 27 · 12% negative · 56% positive · 342 comments
- W vs ORL 136–124
- W @ WAS 139–134
- L vs BOS 108–109
- W @ BKN 129–105
Nov 3 · 13% negative · 43% positive · 115 comments
- L @ CHI 111–113
- L @ CLE 121–132
- W vs TOR 130–120
- L vs DET 108–111
Nov 10 · 26% negative · 34% positive · 58 comments
- W vs BOS 102–100
- L @ DET 105–114
Nov 17 · 20% negative · 39% positive · 51 comments
- W vs LAC 110–108
- L vs TOR 112–121
- W @ MIL 123–114
Nov 24 · 28 comments, under the floor
- L vs ATL 134–142
Dec 1 · 16% negative · 41% positive · 61 comments
- W vs WAS 121–102
- W vs GSW 99–98
- W @ MIL 116–101
- L vs LAL 108–112
Dec 8 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W vs IND 115–105
- L @ ATL 117–120
Dec 15 · 11% negative · 60% positive · 151 comments
- W @ NYK 116–107
- W vs DAL 121–114
Dec 22 · 18 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHI 102–109
- L @ OKC 104–129
Dec 29 · 11% negative · 61% positive · 238 comments
- W @ MEM 139–136
- W @ DAL 123–108
- W @ NYK 130–119
Jan 5 · 14% negative · 56% positive · 146 comments
- L vs DEN 124–125
- W vs WAS 131–110
- W @ ORL 103–91
- L @ TOR 115–116
Jan 12 · 21% negative · 43% positive · 68 comments
- W @ TOR 115–102
- L vs CLE 107–133
- L vs CLE 115–117
Jan 19 · 21% negative · 43% positive · 61 comments
- W vs IND 113–104
- L vs PHX 110–116
- W vs HOU 128–122
- L vs NYK 109–112
Jan 26 · 13% negative · 39% positive · 101 comments
- L @ CHA 93–130
- W vs MIL 139–122
- W vs SAC 113–111
- W vs NOP 124–114
Feb 2 · 20% negative · 34% positive · 97 comments
- W @ LAC 128–113
- W @ GSW 113–94
- L @ LAL 115–119
- W @ PHX 109–103
Feb 9 · 21% negative · 55% positive · 103 comments
- L @ POR 118–135
- L vs NYK 89–138
Feb 16 · 22 comments, under the floor
- L vs ATL 107–117
- L @ NOP 111–126
- W @ MIN 135–108
Feb 23 · 19% negative · 44% positive · 32 comments
- W @ IND 135–114
- W vs MIA 124–117
- L @ BOS 98–114
Mar 2 · 16% negative · 35% positive · 62 comments
- L vs SAS 91–131
Mar 9 · 16 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 139–129
- L @ DET 109–131
- W vs BKN 104–97
- W vs POR 109–103
Mar 16 · 30% negative · 36% positive · 56 comments
- L @ DEN 96–124
- W @ SAC 139–118
- W @ UTA 126–116
Mar 23 · 15% negative · 54% positive · 74 comments
- L vs OKC 103–123
- W vs CHI 157–137
- W @ CHA 118–114
Mar 30 · 19% negative · 45% positive · 53 comments
- L @ MIA 109–119
- W @ WAS 153–131
- W vs MIN 115–103
- L vs DET 93–116
Apr 6 · 15% negative · 36% positive · 33 comments
- L @ SAS 102–115
- L @ HOU 102–113
- W @ IND 105–94
- W vs MIL 126–106
Apr 13 · 17% negative · 55% positive · 215 comments
- W vs ORL 109–97
- L @ BOS 91–123
Apr 20 · 16% negative · 56% positive · 482 comments
- W @ BOS 111–97
- L vs BOS 100–108
- L vs BOS 96–128
Apr 27 · 14% negative · 54% positive · 501 comments
- W @ BOS 113–97
- W vs BOS 106–93
- W @ BOS 109–100
May 4 · 28% negative · 37% positive · 410 comments
- L @ NYK 98–137
- L @ NYK 102–108
- L vs NYK 94–108
- L vs NYK 114–144

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about VJ Edgecombe in 20 of his 90 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment +13 in losses (27% negative, 39% positive) against +48 in wins (12% negative, 61% positive), on a season net sentiment of +33.

+48In wins12% neg · 61% pos · 969 comments

+13In losses27% neg · 39% pos · 526 comments

+33His season16% neg · 49% pos · 4,142 comments

Games the room talked about VJ Edgecombe in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 10R2 G4	R2 G4	vs NYKL 114–144	L 114–144	30	8	6	7	4-14	0-6	0	-33	8/6/7	637	79 points harsher than his season, from 26 comments.
May 8R2 G3	R2 G3	vs NYKL 94–108	L 94–108	40	11	7	4	4-9	1-5	2	-9	11/7/4	9,581	30 points harsher than his season, from 99 comments.
May 6R2 G2	R2 G2	@ NYKL 102–108	L 102–108	40	17	5	3	6-13	3-7	4	-5	17/5/3	7,614	18 points harsher than his season, from 108 comments.
May 4R2 G1	R2 G1	@ NYKL 98–137	L 98–137	28	12	1	2	5-11	2-5	1	-15	12/1/2	9,068	24 points harsher than his season, from 75 comments.
May 2R1 G7	R1 G7	@ BOSW 109–100	W 109–100	44	23	6	4	8-17	5-11	3	+19	23/6/4	22,263	20 points warmer than his season, from 194 comments.
Apr 30R1 G6	R1 G6	vs BOSW 106–93	W 106–93	38	14	8	3	5-11	1-6	0	+18	14/8/3	5,666	10 points warmer than his season, from 65 comments.
Apr 28R1 G5	R1 G5	@ BOSW 113–97	W 113–97	40	10	7	3	3-8	3-6	1	+9	10/7/3	3,329	18 points harsher than his season, from 20 comments.
Apr 26R1 G4	R1 G4	vs BOSL 96–128	L 96–128	36	6	4	1	2-9	0-4	1	-14	6/4/1	4,658	76 points harsher than his season, from 28 comments.
Apr 24R1 G3	R1 G3	vs BOSL 100–108	L 100–108	41	10	10	5	5-17	0-7	2	0	10/10/5	5,048	21 points harsher than his season, from 83 comments.
Apr 21R1 G2	R1 G2	@ BOSW 111–97	W 111–97	35	30	10	2	12-20	6-10	2	+17	30/10/2	3,868	7 points warmer than his season, from 240 comments.

Bad nights get punished: across 20 games the room talked about, net sentiment rises with VJ Edgecombe's Game Score.

r = 0.82 · 20 games · win loss