Paul Reed · Court Sentiment

Verdict

16.0%32.3%51.7%

16.0%Negative207 comments

32.3%Neutral419 comments

51.7%Positive670 comments

+36Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=1,296 comments about Paul ReedUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Paul Reed, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.MIL flair
He’s terrible. Bball Paul being their best center is depressing.
Post · Jalen Duren despite the loss against the Cleveland Cavaliers: 9 PTS, 5 REB, 4 AST, 1 STL, -16, 25 MIN▲ 29May 14, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.NYK flair
Paul Reed is ass
Game thread · CLE 117 @ DET 113 · R2 G5 · May 13▲ 0May 14, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Paul Reed that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Paul Reed, his own Pistons fans are 12% negative, rival fans 21%, unflaired commenters 14%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

11.6%Own fansDET flair · 481 comments

20.8%Rival fansevery other flair · 518 comments

14.5%Unflairedno flair · 297 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Paul Reed are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Paul Reed was talked about most in the game threads: 723 of his 1,296 comments, +35 net sentiment against +36 across his season. His harshest room was the front page, +24 on 16% of his comments; his warmest the game threads. The game threads ran 10 points warmer than the front page.

Game threads56% of his commentsWarmest16.751.5723

Front page16% of his commentsHarshest19.043.3210

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Paul Reed; left out here: Post-game threads (166), Highlights (107), News (87), Daily chat thread (1), Discussion posts (1), Lowlights (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Paul Reed ran between 7% and 33%. His worst week was the week of May 18, 31% negative of 87 comments; his best the week of Feb 16, 71% positive. 31 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · no comments
- W @ MEM 128–112
- L @ MIL 111–117
Oct 13 · no comments
- L @ CLE 100–118
- W vs WAS 119–98
Oct 20 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHI 111–115
- W @ HOU 115–111
Oct 27 · no comments
- L vs CLE 95–116
- W vs ORL 135–116
Nov 3 · 2 comments, under the floor
- W @ MEM 114–106
- W vs UTA 114–103
- W @ BKN 125–107
- W @ PHI 111–108
Nov 10 · 8% negative · 54% positive · 71 comments
- W vs WAS 137–135
- W vs CHI 124–113
- W vs PHI 114–105
Nov 17 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W vs IND 127–112
- W @ ATL 120–112
- W @ MIL 129–116
Nov 24 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L vs ORL 109–112
- W @ MIA 138–135
Dec 1 · no comments
- L @ MIL 109–113
- W vs MIL 124–112
Dec 8 · no comments
- W vs ATL 142–115
Dec 15 · 1 comments, under the floor
- L @ DAL 114–116
- W vs CHA 112–86
Dec 22 · no comments
- W @ POR 110–102
- L @ UTA 129–131
- L @ LAC 99–112
Dec 29 · 3 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAL 128–106
- L vs MIA 112–118
- W @ CLE 114–110
Jan 5 · 13 comments, under the floor
- W vs NYK 121–90
- W vs CHI 108–93
- L vs LAC 92–98
Jan 12 · 1 comments, under the floor
- W vs IND 121–78
Jan 19 · 2 comments, under the floor
- W vs SAC 139–116
Jan 26 · 3 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHX 96–114
- W vs BKN 130–77
Feb 2 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L vs WAS 117–126
- W vs NYK 118–80
Feb 9 · 7% negative · 69% positive · 152 comments
- W @ CHA 110–104
- W @ TOR 113–95
Feb 16 · 6% negative · 71% positive · 52 comments
- W @ NYK 126–111
- W @ CHI 126–110
Feb 23 · 28 comments, under the floor
- L vs SAS 103–114
- W vs OKC 124–116
- W vs CLE 122–119
- W @ ORL 106–92
Mar 2 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ SAS 106–121
- L @ MIA 110–121
Mar 9 · 3 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 138–100
- W vs PHI 131–109
- W vs MEM 126–110
- L @ TOR 108–119
Mar 16 · 10 comments, under the floor
- W @ WAS 130–117
- W @ WAS 117–95
- W vs GSW 115–101
Mar 23 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W vs LAL 113–110
- L vs ATL 129–130
- W vs NOP 129–108
- W @ MIN 109–87
Mar 30 · 16% negative · 67% positive · 43 comments
- L @ OKC 110–114
- W vs TOR 127–116
- W vs MIN 113–108
- W @ PHI 116–93
Apr 6 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L @ ORL 107–123
- W vs MIL 137–111
- W @ CHA 118–100
- W @ IND 133–121
Apr 20 · 20 comments, under the floor
- W vs ORL 98–83
- L @ ORL 105–113
Apr 27 · 21% negative · 36% positive · 98 comments
- W @ ORL 93–79
- W vs ORL 116–94
May 4 · 14% negative · 59% positive · 76 comments
- L @ CLE 109–116
May 11 · 17% negative · 51% positive · 476 comments
- L @ CLE 103–112
- L vs CLE 113–117
- W @ CLE 115–94
- L vs CLE 94–125

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Paul Reed in 11 of his 78 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment +27 in losses (21% negative, 48% positive) against +53 in wins (9% negative, 62% positive), on a season net sentiment of +36.

+53In wins9% neg · 62% pos · 356 comments

+27In losses21% neg · 48% pos · 380 comments

+36His season16% neg · 52% pos · 1,296 comments

Games the room talked about Paul Reed in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 17R2 G7	R2 G7	vs CLEL 94–125	L 94–125	8	4	4	1	2-5	0-0	0	-7	4/4/1	17,494	44 points harsher than his season, from 77 comments.
May 15R2 G6	R2 G6	@ CLEW 115–94	W 115–94	16	17	6	1	7-9	1-1	3	+8	17/6/1	9,941	16 points warmer than his season, from 150 comments.
May 13R2 G5	R2 G5	vs CLEL 113–117	L 113–117	17	10	8	1	4-7	0-0	1	0	10/8/1	12,686	10 points harsher than his season, from 121 comments.
May 11R2 G4	R2 G4	@ CLEL 103–112	L 103–112	14	15	4	2	7-9	1-2	1	-3	15/4/2	6,878	5 points harsher than his season, from 103 comments.
May 9R2 G3	R2 G3	@ CLEL 109–116	L 109–116	10	11	3	0	4-4	0-0	1	+11	11/3/0	7,027	20 points warmer than his season, from 54 comments.
May 1R1 G6	R1 G6	@ ORLW 93–79	W 93–79	11	6	6	0	2-4	0-2	1	+7	6/6/0	9,828	5 points harsher than his season, from 42 comments.
Mar 30		@ OKCL 110–114	L 110–114	34	21	10	2	7-13	1-2	3	-5	21/10/2	4,405	28 points warmer than his season, from 25 comments.
Feb 19		@ NYKW 126–111	W 126–111	29	18	7	2	7-9	0-1	0	+14	18/7/2	1,545	14 points warmer than his season, from 26 comments.
Feb 11		@ TORW 113–95	W 113–95	33	22	5	3	10-17	1-2	2	+21	22/5/3	272	21 points warmer than his season, from 28 comments.
Feb 9		@ CHAW 110–104	W 110–104	18	12	3	1	3-5	1-1	1	-6	12/3/1	2,212	34 points warmer than his season, from 79 comments.