What the room said about Nickeil Alexander-Walker, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.
Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHOULD NICKEIL ALEXANDER WALKER BE TAKING 15 SHOTS. THATS DISGUSTING.
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
Since when did Nickeil turn into a bum
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Nickeil Alexander-Walker that cleared the classifier's confidence bar
and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.
Fans
Of what r/NBA says about Nickeil Alexander-Walker, his own Hawks fans are 16% negative, rival fans 15%, unflaired commenters 16%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.
15.8%Own fansATL flair · 38 comments
14.8%Rival fansevery other flair · 88 comments
16.2%Unflairedno flair · 68 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Nickeil Alexander-Walker are left out of the lists;
the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Rooms
Timeline
Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Nickeil Alexander-Walker ran between 6% and 18%. 40 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.
PreseasonRegular seasonPlayoffsOff-season
Negative 18%Positive 33%
Sep 29 · no commentsNo games
Oct 6 · 2 comments, under the floor
L @ HOU 113–122
Oct 13 · no comments
L vs HOU 115–133
Oct 20 · 5 comments, under the floor
L vs TOR 118–138
W @ ORL 111–107
L vs OKC 100–117
Oct 27 · 3 comments, under the floor
L @ CHI 123–128
W @ BKN 117–112
W @ IND 128–108
L @ CLE 109–117
Nov 3 · 2 comments, under the floor
W vs ORL 127–112
L vs TOR 97–109
Nov 10 · no comments
W @ SAC 133–100
W @ UTA 132–122
W @ PHX 124–122
Nov 17 · 7 comments, under the floor
L vs DET 112–120
L @ SAS 126–135
W @ NOP 115–98
W vs CHA 113–110
Nov 24 · 2 comments, under the floor
L @ WAS 113–132
W vs CLE 130–123
W @ PHI 142–134
Dec 1 · 7 comments, under the floor
L @ DET 98–99
L vs LAC 92–115
L vs DEN 133–134
W @ WAS 131–116
Dec 8 · 1 comments, under the floor
L @ DET 115–142
W vs PHI 120–117
Dec 15 · 3 comments, under the floor
L @ CHA 126–133
L vs SAS 98–126
L vs CHI 150–152
Dec 22 · 2 comments, under the floor
L vs CHI 123–126
L vs MIA 111–126
L vs NYK 125–128
Dec 29 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ OKC 129–140
W vs MIN 126–102
W @ NYK 111–99
L @ TOR 117–134
Jan 5 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ TOR 100–118
W vs NOP 117–100
W @ DEN 110–87
W @ GSW 124–111
Jan 12 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ LAL 116–141
L @ POR 101–117
L vs BOS 106–132
Jan 19 · 2 comments, under the floor
L vs MIL 110–112
W @ MEM 124–122
W vs PHX 110–103
Jan 26 · 3 comments, under the floor
W vs IND 132–116
W @ BOS 117–106
L vs HOU 86–104
L @ IND 124–129
Feb 2 · 5 comments, under the floor
W @ MIA 127–115
W vs UTA 121–119
L vs CHA 119–126
Feb 9 · 2 comments, under the floor
L @ MIN 116–138
L @ CHA 107–110
Feb 16 · no comments
W @ PHI 117–107
L vs MIA 97–128
W vs BKN 115–104
Feb 23 · 1 comments, under the floor
W vs WAS 119–98
W vs POR 135–101
Mar 2 · 2 comments, under the floor
W @ MIL 131–113
W vs PHI 125–116
Mar 9 · 5 comments, under the floor
W vs DAL 124–112
W vs BKN 108–97
W vs MIL 122–99
Mar 16 · 10 comments, under the floor
W vs ORL 124–112
W @ DAL 135–120
L @ HOU 95–117
W vs GSW 126–110
Mar 23 · 14 comments, under the floor
W vs MEM 146–107
W @ DET 130–129
L @ BOS 102–109
W vs SAC 123–113
Mar 30 · 16 comments, under the floor
W vs BOS 112–102
W @ ORL 130–101
W @ BKN 141–107
Apr 6 · 20 comments, under the floor
L vs NYK 105–108
L @ CLE 116–122
W vs CLE 124–102
Apr 13 · 12 comments, under the floor
L @ NYK 102–113
Apr 20 · 23 comments, under the floor
W @ NYK 107–106
W vs NYK 109–108
L vs NYK 98–114
Apr 27 · 8 comments, under the floor
L @ NYK 97–126
L vs NYK 89–140
May 4 · 1 comments, under the floorNo games
May 11 · 1 comments, under the floorNo games
May 18 · 7 comments, under the floorNo games
May 25 · no commentsNo games
Jun 1 · 1 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 8 · 1 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 15 · 2 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 22 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 29 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun
· hover or tap a week for its games.
4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.
Games
The room talked about Nickeil Alexander-Walker in 0 of his 86 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.
—In winstoo few graded wins
—In lossestoo few graded losses
+23His season15% neg · 38% pos · 194 comments
The room never reached 20 comments about Nickeil Alexander-Walker in one of his games.
