Matas Buzelis · Court Sentiment

Verdict

15.0%49.9%35.1%

15.0%Negative92 comments

49.9%Neutral306 comments

35.1%Positive215 comments

+20Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=613 comments about Matas BuzelisUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Matas Buzelis, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.BOS flair
Matas can’t play the 3 he would get torched defensively and he has no consistent 3 pt shot. Theres no shot Matas can play the 3 especially with Giddey at point guard. Also even if Noa did grow to 7 ft, he still can’t play the 5. He’s built like a twig, have you seen him on camera? He got bullied in the few minutes he played this year in the nba at the power forward position. There’s no shot noa can play the 5.
Post · Never trade with OKC▲ 2May 12, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Matas Buzelis that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Matas Buzelis, his own Bulls fans are 15% negative, rival fans 15%, unflaired commenters 15%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

14.7%Own fansCHI flair · 177 comments

15.4%Rival fansevery other flair · 240 comments

14.8%Unflairedno flair · 196 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Matas Buzelis are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Only one room holds enough comments about Matas Buzelis to split. On the front page, 252 of his 613 comments, +15 net sentiment against +20 across his season.

Front page41% of his comments17.532.9252

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Matas Buzelis; left out here: Highlights (122), News (90), Post-game threads (74), Game threads (65), Lowlights (8), Daily chat thread (1), Discussion posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Matas Buzelis ran between 7% and 35%. His worst week was the week of Dec 29, 15% negative of 40 comments; his best the week of Oct 20, 69% positive. 35 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W @ CLE 118–117
- W vs CLE 119–112
- L vs MIL 121–127
Oct 13 · 21 comments, under the floor
- L @ DEN 117–124
- W vs MIN 126–120
Oct 20 · 5% negative · 69% positive · 39 comments
- W vs DET 115–111
- W @ ORL 110–98
Oct 27 · 5% negative · 64% positive · 59 comments
- W vs ATL 128–123
- W vs SAC 126–113
- W vs NYK 135–125
- L @ NYK 116–128
Nov 3 · 12% negative · 32% positive · 34 comments
- W vs PHI 113–111
- L @ MIL 110–126
- L @ CLE 122–128
Nov 10 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L vs SAS 117–121
- L @ DET 113–124
- L @ UTA 147–150
Nov 17 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W @ DEN 130–127
- W @ POR 122–121
- L vs MIA 107–143
- W vs WAS 121–120
Nov 24 · 8 comments, under the floor
- L @ NOP 130–143
- L @ CHA 116–123
- L @ IND 101–103
Dec 1 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L @ ORL 120–125
- L vs BKN 103–113
- L vs IND 105–120
- L vs GSW 91–123
Dec 8 · 10 comments, under the floor
- W @ CHA 129–126
- L vs NOP 104–114
Dec 15 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W vs CLE 127–111
- W @ CLE 136–125
- W @ ATL 152–150
Dec 22 · 8 comments, under the floor
- W @ ATL 126–123
- W vs PHI 109–102
- L vs MIL 103–112
Dec 29 · 15% negative · 28% positive · 40 comments
- L vs MIN 101–136
- W vs NOP 134–118
- W vs ORL 121–114
- L vs CHA 99–112
Jan 5 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L @ BOS 101–115
- L @ DET 93–108
- W vs DAL 125–107
Jan 12 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L @ HOU 113–119
- W vs UTA 128–126
- L @ BKN 109–112
- W vs BKN 124–102
Jan 19 · 6 comments, under the floor
- W vs LAC 138–110
- W @ MIN 120–115
- W vs BOS 114–111
Jan 26 · 14 comments, under the floor
- L vs LAL 118–129
- L @ IND 110–113
- L vs MIA 113–116
- W @ MIA 125–118
- L @ MIA 91–134
Feb 2 · 29 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIL 115–131
- L @ TOR 107–123
- L vs DEN 120–136
Feb 9 · 19 comments, under the floor
- L @ BKN 115–123
- L @ BOS 105–124
Feb 16 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L vs TOR 101–110
- L vs DET 110–126
- L vs NYK 99–105
Feb 23 · 20 comments, under the floor
- L vs CHA 99–131
- L vs POR 112–121
- W vs MIL 120–97
Mar 2 · 8 comments, under the floor
- L vs OKC 108–116
- L @ SAC 110–126
Mar 9 · 15% negative · 41% positive · 68 comments
- W @ GSW 130–124
- L @ LAL 130–142
- L @ LAC 108–119
Mar 16 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 132–107
- L vs TOR 109–139
- L vs CLE 110–115
Mar 23 · 18 comments, under the floor
- W vs HOU 132–124
- L @ PHI 137–157
- L @ OKC 113–131
- L @ MEM 124–125
Mar 30 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L @ SAS 114–129
- L vs IND 126–145
- L @ NYK 96–136
Apr 6 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L vs ORL 103–127

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Matas Buzelis in 1 of his 82 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

+68In wins0% neg · 68% pos · 22 comments

—In lossestoo few graded losses

+20His season15% neg · 35% pos · 613 comments

Games the room talked about Matas Buzelis in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Oct 29		vs SACW 126–113	W 126–113	34	27	5	2	11-18	4-6	3	+18	27/5/2	435	48 points warmer than his season, from 22 comments.