What the room said about Maxime Raynaud, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.
Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Raynaud got cooked over and over in the clutch.
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
Raynaud is absolute trash
Exhibit 03Negative.OKC flair
Raynaud is genuinely the worst defensive big man ive ever seen and thats saying something
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Maxime Raynaud that cleared the classifier's confidence bar
and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.
Fans
Of what r/NBA says about Maxime Raynaud, his own Kings fans are 10% negative, rival fans 21%, unflaired commenters 17%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.
9.7%Own fansSAC flair · 62 comments
21.2%Rival fansevery other flair · 113 comments
17.1%Unflairedno flair · 70 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Maxime Raynaud are left out of the lists;
the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Rooms
Timeline
Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Maxime Raynaud ran between 6% and 23%. 40 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.
PreseasonRegular seasonPlayoffsOff-season
Negative 19%Positive 38%
Sep 29 · no commentsNo games
Oct 6 · 1 comments, under the floor
L vs TOR 122–130
L @ POR 123–124
Oct 13 · 1 comments, under the floor
L vs LAC 91–109
W @ LAL 117–116
Oct 20 · no comments
L @ PHX 116–120
Oct 27 · no comments
W @ MIL 135–133
Nov 3 · 1 comments, under the floor
W vs GSW 121–116
L vs OKC 101–132
L vs MIN 117–144
Nov 10 · no comments
L vs ATL 100–133
Nov 17 · 2 comments, under the floor
L @ OKC 99–113
L @ MEM 96–137
W @ DEN 128–123
Nov 24 · 1 comments, under the floor
W vs MIN 117–112
L vs PHX 100–112
L @ UTA 119–128
L vs MEM 107–115
Dec 1 · 13 comments, under the floor
L @ HOU 95–121
W @ MIA 127–111
Dec 8 · 7 comments, under the floor
L @ IND 105–116
L vs DEN 105–136
L @ MIN 103–117
Dec 15 · 11 comments, under the floor
L @ POR 133–134
L vs POR 93–98
W vs HOU 125–124
Dec 22 · 8 comments, under the floor
L vs DET 127–136
W vs DAL 113–107
L @ LAL 101–125
Dec 29 · 9 comments, under the floor
L @ LAC 90–131
L vs BOS 106–120
L @ PHX 102–129
L vs MIL 98–115
Jan 5 · 6 comments, under the floor
L vs DAL 98–100
L @ GSW 103–137
W vs HOU 111–98
Jan 12 · 6 comments, under the floor
W vs LAL 124–112
W vs NYK 112–101
W vs WAS 128–115
L vs POR 110–117
Jan 19 · 5 comments, under the floor
L vs MIA 117–130
L vs TOR 109–122
L @ CLE 118–123
L @ DET 116–139
Jan 26 · 2 comments, under the floor
L @ NYK 87–103
L @ PHI 111–113
L @ BOS 93–112
L @ WAS 112–116
Feb 2 · 6 comments, under the floor
L vs MEM 125–129
L vs LAC 111–114
L vs CLE 126–132
Feb 9 · 11 comments, under the floor
L @ NOP 94–120
L @ UTA 93–121
Feb 16 · 12 comments, under the floor
L vs ORL 94–131
L @ SAS 122–139
Feb 23 · 3 comments, under the floor
W @ MEM 123–114
L @ HOU 97–128
W @ DAL 130–121
L @ LAL 104–128
Mar 2 · 6 comments, under the floor
L vs PHX 103–114
L vs NOP 123–133
W vs CHI 126–110
Mar 9 · 8 comments, under the floor
W vs IND 114–109
L vs CHA 109–117
W @ LAC 118–109
W vs UTA 116–111
Mar 16 · 24 comments, under the floor
L vs SAS 104–132
L vs PHI 118–139
W vs BKN 126–122
Mar 23 · 11 comments, under the floor
L @ CHA 90–134
L @ ORL 117–121
L @ ATL 113–123
L @ BKN 99–116
Mar 30 · 8 comments, under the floor
W @ TOR 123–115
W vs NOP 117–113
L vs LAC 109–138
Apr 6 · 22 comments, under the floor
L @ GSW 105–110
W vs GSW 124–118
L @ POR 110–122
Apr 13 · 6 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 20 · 2 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 27 · 2 comments, under the floorNo games
May 4 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
May 11 · 2 comments, under the floorNo games
May 18 · 16 comments, under the floorNo games
May 25 · 2 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 1 · 2 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 8 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 15 · no commentsNo games
Jun 22 · 19 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 29 · 4 comments, under the floorNo games
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun
· hover or tap a week for its games.
4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.
Games
The room talked about Maxime Raynaud in 0 of his 78 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.
—In winstoo few graded wins
—In lossestoo few graded losses
+25His season17% neg · 42% pos · 245 comments
The room never reached 20 comments about Maxime Raynaud in one of his games.
