2025-26

Onyeka Okongwu

ATL · F-C · #17

Unofficial: 293 comments, 4,707 short of the official minimum of 5,000. Among all 223 tracked players he would rank 21st most loved.

PPG: 15.2
RPG: 7.6
APG: 3.1
GP: 74

Height: 6′10″
Weight: 240 lb
Age: 25
Born: Dec 11, 2000
Experience: 5 yrs
From: Southern California

Verdict

17.7%44.4%37.9%

17.7%Negative52 comments

44.4%Neutral130 comments

37.9%Positive111 comments

+20Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=293 comments about Onyeka OkongwuUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Onyeka Okongwu, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.SAS flair
there is no chance Okongwu knows how to read zero chance
Game thread · NYK 114 @ ATL 98 · R1 G4 · Apr 25▲ 1Apr 25, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Onyeka Okongwu that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Onyeka Okongwu, his own Hawks fans are 12% negative, rival fans 19%, unflaired commenters 24%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

12.3%Own fansATL flair · 106 comments

18.6%Rival fansevery other flair · 113 comments

24.3%Unflairedno flair · 74 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Onyeka Okongwu are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Onyeka Okongwu ran between 6% and 33%. His worst week was the week of Apr 20, 20% negative of 44 comments; his best the week of Apr 20, 52% positive. 39 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L @ HOU 113–122
- W @ MEM 122–116
Oct 13 · 5 comments, under the floor
- L vs HOU 115–133
Oct 20 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L vs TOR 118–138
- W @ ORL 111–107
- L vs OKC 100–117
Oct 27 · 2 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHI 123–128
- W @ BKN 117–112
- W @ IND 128–108
- L @ CLE 109–117
Nov 3 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W vs ORL 127–112
- L vs TOR 97–109
- W vs LAL 122–102
Nov 10 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAC 105–102
- W @ SAC 133–100
- W @ UTA 132–122
- W @ PHX 124–122
Nov 17 · 9 comments, under the floor
- L vs DET 112–120
- L @ SAS 126–135
- W vs CHA 113–110
Nov 24 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ WAS 113–132
- W vs CLE 130–123
- W @ PHI 142–134
Dec 1 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ DET 98–99
- L vs LAC 92–115
- L vs DEN 133–134
- W @ WAS 131–116
Dec 8 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L @ DET 115–142
- W vs PHI 120–117
Dec 15 · 3 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHA 126–133
- L vs SAS 98–126
- L vs CHI 150–152
Dec 22 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L vs CHI 123–126
- L vs MIA 111–126
- L vs NYK 125–128
Dec 29 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L @ OKC 129–140
- W vs MIN 126–102
- W @ NYK 111–99
- L @ TOR 117–134
Jan 5 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L @ TOR 100–118
- W @ DEN 110–87
- W @ GSW 124–111
Jan 12 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L @ LAL 116–141
- L @ POR 101–117
- L vs BOS 106–132
Jan 19 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIL 110–112
- W @ MEM 124–122
- W vs PHX 110–103
Jan 26 · 20 comments, under the floor
- W vs IND 132–116
- W @ BOS 117–106
Feb 2 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L vs CHA 119–126
Feb 9 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIN 116–138
- L @ CHA 107–110
Feb 16 · 1 comments, under the floor
- W @ PHI 117–107
- L vs MIA 97–128
- W vs BKN 115–104
Feb 23 · no comments
- W vs WAS 119–98
- W vs WAS 126–96
- W vs POR 135–101
Mar 2 · 8 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIL 131–113
- W vs PHI 125–116
Mar 9 · no comments
- W vs DAL 124–112
- W vs BKN 108–97
- W vs MIL 122–99
Mar 16 · no comments
- W vs ORL 124–112
- W @ DAL 135–120
- L @ HOU 95–117
- W vs GSW 126–110
Mar 23 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 146–107
- W @ DET 130–129
- L @ BOS 102–109
Mar 30 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W vs BOS 112–102
- W @ ORL 130–101
- W @ BKN 141–107
Apr 6 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L vs NYK 105–108
- L @ CLE 116–122
- W vs CLE 124–102
Apr 13 · 20 comments, under the floor
- L @ NYK 102–113
Apr 20 · 20% negative · 52% positive · 44 comments
- W @ NYK 107–106
- W vs NYK 109–108
- L vs NYK 98–114
Apr 27 · 12 comments, under the floor
- L @ NYK 97–126
- L vs NYK 89–140

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Onyeka Okongwu in 1 of his 83 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

+41In wins18% neg · 59% pos · 22 comments

—In lossestoo few graded losses

+20His season18% neg · 38% pos · 293 comments

Games the room talked about Onyeka Okongwu in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 23R1 G3	R1 G3	vs NYKW 109–108	W 109–108	37	9	7	1	4-7	1-4	1	-4	9/7/1	6,607	21 points warmer than his season, from 22 comments.