Payton Pritchard · Court Sentiment

Verdict

23.5%40.9%35.6%

23.5%Negative539 comments

40.9%Neutral937 comments

35.6%Positive816 comments

+12Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=2,292 comments about Payton PritchardUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Payton Pritchard, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.LAL flair
Thank God I will stop seeing Pritchard fucking face for a moment. Fuck Boston!
Post · [Highlight] The Philadelphia 76ers defeat the Boston Celtics 109-100 in Game 7 to win their series. Philadelphia overcomes a 3-1 series deficit for the first time in franchise history and will face the New York Knicks in the Eastern Conference Semifinals.▲ 31May 3, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.LAL flair
Sayton Pritchard needs to be put in prison
Post-game thread · ATL 102 @ BOS 109 · Mar 27▲ 12Mar 28, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.PHI flair
GET FUCKED PAYTON PRITCHARD. I cannot stand that man he is such a goddamn thumb looking ICE supporting racist Oregonian meth head family dumbass fuck
Game thread · PHI 109 @ BOS 100 · R1 G7 · May 2▲ 9May 3, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Payton Pritchard that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Payton Pritchard, his own Celtics fans are 21% negative, rival fans 28%, unflaired commenters 22%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

21.0%Own fansBOS flair · 742 comments

27.5%Rival fansevery other flair · 778 comments

21.9%Unflairedno flair · 772 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Payton Pritchard are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Payton Pritchard was talked about most on the front page: 918 of his 2,292 comments, +11 net sentiment against +12 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, +2 on 10% of his comments; his warmest highlights, +22 on 11% of his comments.

Game threads28% of his comments28.340.7637

Post-game threads10% of his comments25.042.0224

Front page40% of his comments21.932.9918

Highlights11% of his commentsWarmest16.738.9257

News10% of his commentsHarshest21.323.5230

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Payton Pritchard; left out here: Injury posts (10), Daily chat thread (9), Lowlights (6). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Payton Pritchard ran between 12% and 33%. His worst week was the week of Oct 20, 53% negative of 40 comments; his best the week of Mar 2, 50% positive. 19 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 19 comments, under the floor
- L @ TOR 105–107
- W vs CLE 138–107
Oct 13 · 26 comments, under the floor
- W vs TOR 110–108
Oct 20 · 53% negative · 18% positive · 40 comments
- L vs PHI 116–117
- L @ NYK 95–105
- L @ DET 113–119
Oct 27 · 19% negative · 14% positive · 37 comments
- W @ NOP 122–90
- W vs CLE 125–105
- W @ PHI 109–108
- L vs HOU 101–128
Nov 3 · 20 comments, under the floor
- L vs UTA 103–105
- W vs WAS 136–107
- L @ ORL 110–123
- W @ ORL 111–107
Nov 10 · 19 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHI 100–102
- W vs MEM 131–95
- W vs LAC 121–118
Nov 17 · 17 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 113–99
- L vs BKN 105–113
- W vs ORL 138–129
Nov 24 · 26 comments, under the floor
- W vs DET 117–114
- L @ MIN 115–119
- W @ CLE 117–115
Dec 1 · 19% negative · 39% positive · 31 comments
- W vs NYK 123–117
- W @ WAS 146–101
- W vs LAL 126–105
- W @ TOR 121–113
Dec 8 · 14 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIL 101–116
Dec 15 · 23 comments, under the floor
- L vs DET 105–112
- W vs MIA 129–116
- W @ TOR 112–96
Dec 22 · 17 comments, under the floor
- W vs IND 103–95
- W @ IND 140–122
- L @ POR 108–114
Dec 29 · 39% negative · 26% positive · 31 comments
- W @ UTA 129–119
- W @ SAC 120–106
- W @ LAC 146–115
Jan 5 · 25% negative · 32% positive · 59 comments
- W vs CHI 115–101
- L vs DEN 110–114
- W vs TOR 125–117
- L vs SAS 95–100
Jan 12 · 24% negative · 31% positive · 59 comments
- L @ IND 96–98
- W @ MIA 119–114
Jan 19 · 17 comments, under the floor
- L @ DET 103–104
- W vs IND 119–104
- W @ BKN 130–126
- L @ CHI 111–114
Jan 26 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W vs POR 102–94
- L vs ATL 106–117
- W vs SAC 112–93
- W vs MIL 107–79
Feb 2 · 23% negative · 33% positive · 269 comments
- W @ DAL 110–100
- W @ HOU 114–93
- W vs MIA 98–96
- L vs NYK 89–111
Feb 9 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W vs CHI 124–105
Feb 16 · 21% negative · 42% positive · 38 comments
- W @ GSW 121–110
- W @ LAL 111–89
Feb 23 · 23% negative · 48% positive · 243 comments
- W @ PHX 97–81
- L @ DEN 84–103
- W vs BKN 148–111
- W vs PHI 114–98
Mar 2 · 19% negative · 50% positive · 88 comments
- W @ MIL 108–81
- L vs CHA 89–118
- W vs DAL 120–100
- W @ CLE 109–98
Mar 9 · 14% negative · 49% positive · 123 comments
- L @ OKC 102–104
- W vs WAS 111–100
Mar 16 · 17% negative · 32% positive · 47 comments
- W vs PHX 120–112
- W vs GSW 120–99
- W @ MEM 117–112
- L vs MIN 92–102
Mar 23 · 26% negative · 34% positive · 68 comments
- W vs OKC 119–109
- W vs ATL 109–102
- W @ CHA 114–99
Mar 30 · 16% negative · 32% positive · 56 comments
- L @ ATL 102–112
- W @ MIA 147–129
- W @ MIL 133–101
- W vs TOR 115–101
Apr 6 · 10% negative · 40% positive · 62 comments
- W vs CHA 113–102
- L @ NYK 106–112
- W vs NOP 144–118
Apr 13 · 30% negative · 33% positive · 33 comments
- W vs PHI 123–91
Apr 20 · 26% negative · 43% positive · 202 comments
- L vs PHI 97–111
- W @ PHI 108–100
- W @ PHI 128–96
Apr 27 · 29% negative · 29% positive · 328 comments
- L vs PHI 97–113
- L @ PHI 93–106
- L vs PHI 100–109

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Payton Pritchard in 8 of his 89 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −5 in losses (34% negative, 29% positive) against +35 in wins (21% negative, 56% positive), on a season net sentiment of +12.

+35In wins21% neg · 56% pos · 317 comments

−5In losses34% neg · 29% pos · 174 comments

+12His season24% neg · 36% pos · 2,292 comments

Games the room talked about Payton Pritchard in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 2R1 G7	R1 G7	vs PHIL 100–109	L 100–109	39	13	5	7	5-13	2-7	0	-2	13/5/7	22,263	43 points harsher than his season, from 67 comments.
Apr 30R1 G6	R1 G6	@ PHIL 93–106	L 93–106	36	14	3	5	6-16	1-8	1	-6	14/3/5	5,666	45 points harsher than his season, from 24 comments.
Apr 28R1 G5	R1 G5	vs PHIL 97–113	L 97–113	26	12	2	6	5-10	1-5	0	+8	12/2/6	3,329	29 points harsher than his season, from 24 comments.
Apr 26R1 G4	R1 G4	@ PHIW 128–96	W 128–96	35	32	4	5	12-21	6-12	0	+20	32/4/5	4,658	22 points warmer than his season, from 163 comments.
Apr 24R1 G3	R1 G3	@ PHIW 108–100	W 108–100	33	15	4	2	5-12	5-10	1	+18	15/4/2	5,048	5 points harsher than his season, from 41 comments.
Mar 12		@ OKCL 102–104	L 102–104	39	14	4	4	6-17	2-9	2	-7	14/4/4	3,267	29 points warmer than his season, from 59 comments.
Mar 8		@ CLEW 109–98	W 109–98	35	18	3	7	7-12	2-6	2	+18	18/3/7	983	44 points warmer than his season, from 23 comments.
Feb 22		@ LALW 111–89	W 111–89	38	30	4	8	10-14	6-9	4	+21	30/4/8	2,030	32 points warmer than his season, from 90 comments.