Derik Queen · Court Sentiment

Verdict

23.5%52.6%23.9%

23.5%Negative104 comments

52.6%Neutral233 comments

23.9%Positive106 comments

0Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=443 comments about Derik QueenUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Derik Queen, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.MEM flair
Derik Queen has been horrible for months now
Post · [NBA.com] Final Rookie Ladder of The 2025-26 Season▲ 1Apr 8, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
fuck you derik queen
Post-game thread · PHX 115 @ NOP 108 · Dec 26▲ -1Dec 27, 2025Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Derik Queen that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Derik Queen, his own Pelicans fans are 26% negative, rival fans 25%, unflaired commenters 21%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

25.9%Own fansNOP flair · 54 comments

24.6%Rival fansevery other flair · 236 comments

20.9%Unflairedno flair · 153 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Derik Queen are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Only one room holds enough comments about Derik Queen to split. On the front page, 235 of his 443 comments, −2 net sentiment against 0 across his season.

Front page53% of his comments25.523.4235

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Derik Queen; left out here: News (65), Highlights (54), Game threads (43), Post-game threads (43), Lowlights (2), Daily chat thread (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Derik Queen ran between 15% and 53%. His worst week was the week of Dec 15, 16% negative of 37 comments; his best the week of Dec 22, 48% positive. 36 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 20 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ MEM 122–128
- L vs SAS 116–120
Oct 27 · 23 comments, under the floor
- L vs BOS 90–122
- L @ DEN 88–122
- L @ LAC 124–126
- L @ OKC 106–137
Nov 3 · 24 comments, under the floor
- W vs CHA 116–112
- W @ DAL 101–99
- L @ SAS 119–126
Nov 10 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHX 98–121
- L vs POR 117–125
- L vs LAL 104–118
- L vs GSW 106–124
Nov 17 · 16% negative · 32% positive · 57 comments
- L vs OKC 109–126
- L vs DEN 118–125
- L @ DAL 115–118
- L vs ATL 98–115
Nov 24 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W vs CHI 143–130
- L vs MEM 128–133
- L @ GSW 96–104
- L @ LAL 121–133
Dec 1 · 12 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIN 142–149
- L vs MIN 116–125
- L @ BKN 101–119
Dec 8 · 16% negative · 34% positive · 56 comments
- L vs SAS 132–135
- W vs POR 143–120
- W @ CHI 114–104
Dec 15 · 16% negative · 30% positive · 37 comments
- W vs HOU 133–128
- W vs IND 128–109
Dec 22 · 12% negative · 48% positive · 33 comments
- W vs DAL 119–113
- L @ CLE 118–141
- L vs PHX 108–115
- L vs PHX 114–123
Dec 29 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L vs NYK 125–130
- L @ CHI 118–134
- L @ MIA 106–125
Jan 5 · 23 comments, under the floor
- L vs LAL 103–111
- L @ ATL 100–117
- W @ WAS 128–107
- L @ ORL 118–128
Jan 12 · 12 comments, under the floor
- L vs DEN 116–122
- W vs BKN 116–113
- L @ IND 119–127
- L @ HOU 110–119
Jan 19 · 3 comments, under the floor
- L vs DET 104–112
- W @ MEM 133–127
- W @ SAS 104–95
Jan 26 · 2 comments, under the floor
- L @ OKC 95–104
- W vs MEM 114–106
- L @ PHI 114–124
Feb 2 · 5 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHA 95–102
- L @ MIL 137–141
- W @ MIN 119–115
Feb 9 · 8 comments, under the floor
- W vs SAC 120–94
- L vs MIA 111–123
Feb 16 · 1 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIL 118–139
- W vs PHI 126–111
Feb 23 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W vs GSW 113–109
- W @ UTA 129–118
- W @ UTA 115–105
- L @ LAC 117–137
Mar 2 · 1 comments, under the floor
- L @ LAL 101–110
- W @ SAC 133–123
- L @ PHX 116–118
- W vs WAS 138–118
Mar 9 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W vs TOR 122–111
- L @ HOU 105–107
Mar 16 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W vs DAL 129–111
- W vs LAC 124–109
- W vs LAC 105–99
- L vs CLE 106–111
Mar 23 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L @ NYK 116–121
- L @ DET 108–129
- L @ TOR 106–119
- L vs HOU 102–134
Mar 30 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L @ POR 106–118
- L @ SAC 113–117
- L vs ORL 108–112
Apr 6 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W vs UTA 156–137
- L @ BOS 118–144
- L @ MIN 126–132

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Derik Queen in 0 of his 81 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

—In winstoo few graded wins

—In lossestoo few graded losses

0His season23% neg · 24% pos · 443 comments

The room never reached 20 comments about Derik Queen in one of his games.