P.J. Washington · Court Sentiment

Verdict

26.7%48.4%24.9%

26.7%Negative343 comments

48.4%Neutral623 comments

24.9%Positive320 comments

−2Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=1,286 comments about P.J. WashingtonUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about P.J. Washington, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
PJ Washington is ass
Post-game thread · CHA 123 @ DAL 121 · Jan 29▲ 10Jan 30, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.OKC flair
I wish Presti would trade for PJ just so we can banish him to the G-league forever so he can't hurt us anymore.
Post · How Impactful Was Shai In The Lakers Series?▲ 10May 12, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.DAL flair
nightmare offensive game from pj washington in every facet of the word
Post-game thread · DAL 110 @ DET 122 · Nov 1▲ 8Nov 2, 2025Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about P.J. Washington that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about P.J. Washington, his own Mavericks fans are 22% negative, rival fans 28%, unflaired commenters 26%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

22.3%Own fansDAL flair · 157 comments

28.2%Rival fansevery other flair · 703 comments

25.8%Unflairedno flair · 426 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about P.J. Washington are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

P.J. Washington was talked about most on the front page: 671 of his 1,286 comments, +2 net sentiment against −2 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −5 on 17% of his comments; his warmest the front page.

Front page52% of his commentsWarmest24.927.1671

News17% of his commentsHarshest23.518.6221

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about P.J. Washington; left out here: Game threads (178), Highlights (114), Post-game threads (86), Lowlights (7), Daily chat thread (3), Discussion posts (3), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about P.J. Washington ran between 18% and 35%. His worst week was the week of Jan 26, 46% negative of 50 comments; his best the week of May 4, 50% positive. 20 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W vs OKC 106–89
- L vs CHA 116–120
Oct 13 · 12 comments, under the floor
- W @ UTA 114–101
- W @ LAL 121–94
Oct 20 · 30% negative · 36% positive · 44 comments
- L vs SAS 92–125
- L vs WAS 107–117
- W vs TOR 139–129
Oct 27 · 31% negative · 22% positive · 32 comments
- L vs OKC 94–101
- W vs IND 107–105
- L vs DET 110–122
Nov 3 · 16% negative · 32% positive · 56 comments
- L @ HOU 102–110
- L vs NOP 99–101
- L @ MEM 104–118
- W @ WAS 111–105
Nov 10 · 33% negative · 32% positive · 114 comments
- L vs MIL 114–116
- L vs PHX 114–123
- W vs POR 138–133
Nov 17 · 24 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIN 96–120
- L vs NYK 111–113
- W vs NOP 118–115
- L vs MEM 96–102
Nov 24 · 42% negative · 22% positive · 45 comments
- L @ MIA 102–106
- L @ LAL 119–129
Dec 1 · 18% negative · 34% positive · 44 comments
- W vs HOU 122–109
Dec 8 · 24% negative · 21% positive · 33 comments
- W vs BKN 119–111
Dec 15 · 31% negative · 13% positive · 32 comments
- L @ UTA 133–140
- W vs DET 116–114
- L @ PHI 114–121
Dec 22 · 28% negative · 21% positive · 39 comments
- L @ NOP 113–119
- L @ GSW 116–126
- L @ SAC 107–113
Dec 29 · 27% negative · 37% positive · 30 comments
- L @ POR 122–125
- L vs PHI 108–123
- W vs HOU 110–104
Jan 12 · 30% negative · 27% positive · 30 comments
- L vs DEN 109–118
Jan 19 · 29 comments, under the floor
- W vs GSW 123–115
- L vs LAL 110–116
Jan 26 · 46% negative · 12% positive · 50 comments
- L vs MIN 105–118
- L vs CHA 121–123
- L @ HOU 107–111
Feb 2 · 28% negative · 22% positive · 32 comments
- L @ SAS 125–138
Feb 9 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHX 111–120
- L @ LAL 104–124
Feb 16 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIN 111–122
- W @ IND 134–130
Feb 23 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 123–114
Mar 2 · 26 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHA 90–117
- L @ ORL 114–115
- L @ BOS 100–120
- L @ TOR 92–122
Mar 9 · 20 comments, under the floor
- L @ ATL 112–124
- W @ MEM 120–112
- W @ CLE 130–120
Mar 16 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L @ NOP 111–129
- L vs ATL 120–135
- L vs LAC 131–138
Mar 23 · 18 comments, under the floor
- L vs GSW 131–137
- L @ DEN 135–142
- W @ POR 100–93
Mar 30 · 21% negative · 36% positive · 39 comments
- W vs LAL 134–128

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about P.J. Washington in 0 of his 60 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

—In winstoo few graded wins

—In lossestoo few graded losses

−2His season27% neg · 25% pos · 1,286 comments

The room never reached 20 comments about P.J. Washington in one of his games.