Mike Conley · Court Sentiment

Verdict

30.7%40.1%29.2%

30.7%Negative734 comments

40.1%Neutral957 comments

29.2%Positive696 comments

−2Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=2,387 comments about Mike ConleyUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Mike Conley, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.LAL flair
Conley is beyond washed now
Post-game thread · MIN 112 @ SAC 117 · Nov 24▲ 126Nov 25, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.DEN flair
mike conley merchants and unfortunately mike conley is washed
Post-game thread · MIN 112 @ SAC 117 · Nov 24▲ 75Nov 25, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
This decision is not because they're done with Conley and moving on, it's because he is so old and washed that they think they will be better if he plays limited minutes off the bench
Post · [Haynes] Sources: Minnesota Timberwolves will award Donte DiVincenzo the starting point guard spot to open the 2025-26 NBA season. Mike Conley will remain a vital piece.▲ 38Oct 22, 2025Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Mike Conley that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Mike Conley, his own Timberwolves fans are 31% negative, rival fans 29%, unflaired commenters 34%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

30.7%Own fansMIN flair · 664 comments

28.9%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,052 comments

33.7%Unflairedno flair · 671 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Mike Conley are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Mike Conley was talked about most in the game threads: 725 of his 2,387 comments, +1 net sentiment against −2 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −4 on 26% of his comments; his warmest the game threads.

Game threads30% of his commentsWarmest35.436.3725

Front page29% of his comments30.927.3703

News26% of his commentsHarshest25.621.5632

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Mike Conley; left out here: Highlights (199), Post-game threads (111), Daily chat thread (8), Discussion posts (4), Injury posts (2), Lowlights (2). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Mike Conley ran between 25% and 40%. His worst week was the week of Nov 24, 55% negative of 47 comments; his best the week of Dec 1, 55% positive. 22 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L vs IND 134–135
Oct 13 · 19 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHI 120–126
Oct 20 · 40% negative · 16% positive · 43 comments
- W @ POR 118–114
- L @ LAL 110–128
- W vs IND 114–110
Oct 27 · 52% negative · 16% positive · 31 comments
- L vs DEN 114–127
- L vs LAL 115–116
- W @ CHA 122–105
Nov 3 · 29% negative · 34% positive · 56 comments
- W @ BKN 125–109
- L @ NYK 114–137
- W vs UTA 137–97
- W @ SAC 144–117
Nov 10 · 26 comments, under the floor
- W @ UTA 120–113
- W vs SAC 124–110
- L vs DEN 112–123
Nov 17 · 49% negative · 30% positive · 37 comments
- W vs DAL 120–96
- W vs WAS 120–109
- L @ PHX 113–114
Nov 24 · 55% negative · 19% positive · 47 comments
- L @ SAC 112–117
- L @ OKC 105–113
- W vs BOS 119–115
- W vs SAS 125–112
Dec 1 · 23% negative · 55% positive · 44 comments
- W @ NOP 149–142
- W @ NOP 125–116
- W vs LAC 109–106
Dec 8 · 35% negative · 20% positive · 40 comments
- L vs PHX 105–108
Dec 15 · 19 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIL 103–100
Dec 22 · 20 comments, under the floor
- W vs NYK 115–104
- L @ DEN 138–142
Dec 29 · 29 comments, under the floor
- W @ CHI 136–101
- L @ ATL 102–126
- W @ MIA 125–115
- W @ WAS 141–115
Jan 5 · 30% negative · 10% positive · 40 comments
- W vs MIA 122–94
- W vs CLE 131–122
- W vs SAS 104–103
Jan 12 · 32% negative · 8% positive · 37 comments
- W @ MIL 139–106
- L @ HOU 105–110
- L @ SAS 123–126
Jan 19 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L @ UTA 122–127
- L vs CHI 115–120
- L vs GSW 85–111
Jan 26 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W vs GSW 108–83
- W @ DAL 118–105
- W @ MEM 131–114
Feb 2 · 29% negative · 17% positive · 339 comments
- L @ MEM 128–137
Feb 16 · 20% negative · 43% positive · 35 comments
- L vs PHI 108–135
Feb 23 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAC 94–88
Mar 16 · 6 comments, under the floor
- W vs UTA 147–111
Mar 23 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W vs HOU 110–108
- L vs DET 87–109
Mar 30 · 33% negative · 31% positive · 36 comments
- W @ DAL 124–94
- L @ DET 108–113
- L vs CHA 108–122
Apr 6 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W @ IND 124–104
- W @ HOU 136–132
Apr 13 · 25% negative · 39% positive · 119 comments
- L @ DEN 105–116
Apr 20 · 35% negative · 23% positive · 157 comments
- W @ DEN 119–114
- W vs DEN 113–96
- W vs DEN 112–96
Apr 27 · 35% negative · 32% positive · 215 comments
- L @ DEN 113–125
- W vs DEN 110–98
May 4 · 21% negative · 50% positive · 367 comments
- W @ SAS 104–102
- L @ SAS 95–133
- L vs SAS 108–115
- W vs SAS 114–109
May 11 · 33% negative · 29% positive · 246 comments
- L @ SAS 97–126
- L vs SAS 109–139

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Mike Conley in 10 of his 68 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment +4 in losses (33% negative, 37% positive) against +11 in wins (31% negative, 42% positive), on a season net sentiment of −2.

+11In wins31% neg · 42% pos · 385 comments

+4In losses33% neg · 37% pos · 251 comments

−2His season31% neg · 29% pos · 2,387 comments

Games the room talked about Mike Conley in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 15R2 G6	R2 G6	vs SASL 109–139	L 109–139	19	6	0	4	2-3	2-3	0	-5	6/0/4	12,817	1 point harsher than his season, from 47 comments.
May 12R2 G5	R2 G5	@ SASL 97–126	L 97–126	15	5	1	2	2-3	1-2	0	-7	5/1/2	9,878	20 points warmer than his season, from 44 comments.
May 10R2 G4	R2 G4	vs SASW 114–109	W 114–109	11	8	0	2	2-2	2-2	1	+10	8/0/2	163	10 points harsher than his season, from 69 comments.
May 8R2 G3	R2 G3	vs SASL 108–115	L 108–115	4	0	2	0	0-1	0-1	1	-10	0/2/0	16,377	22 points warmer than his season, from 20 comments.
May 6R2 G2	R2 G2	@ SASL 95–133	L 95–133	16	3	1	3	1-4	1-3	0	-10	3/1/3	10,165	32 points harsher than his season, from 24 comments.
May 4R2 G1	R2 G1	@ SASW 104–102	W 104–102	24	12	2	6	4-8	4-7	0	+13	12/2/6	17,924	48 points warmer than his season, from 156 comments.
Apr 30R1 G6	R1 G6	vs DENW 110–98	W 110–98	26	7	6	3	3-7	1-4	1	-1	7/6/3	18,335	5 points harsher than his season, from 87 comments.
Apr 27R1 G5	R1 G5	@ DENL 113–125	L 113–125	17	4	1	4	2-4	0-0	1	-7	4/1/4	7,427	15 points harsher than his season, from 31 comments.
Apr 25R1 G4	R1 G4	vs DENW 112–96	W 112–96	21	5	1	4	2-4	1-2	1	+7	5/1/4	13,778	23 points harsher than his season, from 73 comments.
Apr 18R1 G1	R1 G1	@ DENL 105–116	L 105–116	11	3	1	2	1-1	1-1	0	0	3/1/2	10,584	17 points warmer than his season, from 85 comments.