2025-26

Amen Thompson

HOU · G-F · #1

Unofficial: 4,172 comments, 828 short of the official minimum of 5,000. Among all 223 tracked players he would rank 72nd most discussed.

PPG: 18.3
RPG: 7.8
APG: 5.3
GP: 79

Height: 6′7″
Weight: 200 lb
Age: 23
Born: Jan 30, 2003
Experience: 2 yrs
From: Overtime Elite

Verdict

31.0%48.2%20.9%

31.0%Negative1,292 comments

48.2%Neutral2,009 comments

20.9%Positive871 comments

−10Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=4,172 comments about Amen ThompsonUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Amen Thompson, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Amen more like Abitch here
Post · [Highlight] Rui Hachimura offers to help Alperen Sengun up, but Amen Thompson arrives just in time to push Hachimura away▲ 353May 2, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.LAL flair
Amen proved himself to be such a bitch this series
Post · [Highlight] Rui Hachimura offers to help Alperen Sengun up, but Amen Thompson arrives just in time to push Hachimura away▲ 300May 2, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.UTA flair
Amen Thompson is so useless late game it’s unbelievable
Post · Alperen Sengun despite the game 3 loss versus Lakers: 33 PTS, 16 REB, 6 AST, 3 STL, 1 BLK, +10, 47 MIN▲ 69Apr 25, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Amen Thompson that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Amen Thompson, his own Rockets fans are 25% negative, rival fans 32%, unflaired commenters 31%. Among the 3 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Lakers fans are hardest on him at 35% negative and Rockets fans kindest at 34% positive.

24.9%Own fansHOU flair · 498 comments

32.0%Rival fansevery other flair · 2,111 comments

31.5%Unflairedno flair · 1,563 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Amen Thompson are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Amen Thompson was talked about most on the front page: 1,446 of his 4,172 comments, −6 net sentiment against −10 across his season. His harshest room was the post-game threads, −13 on 7% of his comments; his warmest the front page. The game threads ran 6 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads29% of his comments35.423.41,227

Post-game threads7% of his commentsHarshest35.722.4308

Front page35% of his commentsWarmest26.420.21,446

Highlights16% of his comments30.619.5682

News10% of his comments28.717.0429

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Amen Thompson; left out here: Lowlights (49), Daily chat thread (14), Injury posts (13), Discussion posts (4). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Amen Thompson ran between 15% and 40%. His worst week was the week of Feb 23, 47% negative of 83 comments; his best the week of Apr 6, 39% positive. 3 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 20% negative · 20% positive · 30 comments
- W vs ATL 122–113
- W vs UTA 140–127
Oct 13 · 24% negative · 24% positive · 93 comments
- W @ NOP 130–128
Oct 20 · 29% negative · 26% positive · 373 comments
- L @ OKC 124–125
- L vs DET 111–115
Oct 27 · 13% negative · 30% positive · 30 comments
- W vs BKN 137–109
- W @ TOR 139–121
- W @ BOS 128–101
Nov 3 · 19% negative · 30% positive · 118 comments
- W vs DAL 110–102
- W @ MEM 124–109
- L @ SAS 110–121
- W @ MIL 122–115
Nov 10 · 9% negative · 25% positive · 53 comments
- W vs WAS 135–112
- W vs POR 140–116
- W vs ORL 117–113
Nov 17 · 29% negative · 26% positive · 102 comments
- W @ CLE 114–104
- L vs DEN 109–112
Nov 24 · 31% negative · 26% positive · 114 comments
- W @ PHX 114–92
- W @ GSW 104–100
- W @ UTA 129–101
Dec 1 · 29% negative · 26% positive · 70 comments
- L @ UTA 125–133
- W vs SAC 121–95
- W vs PHX 117–98
- L @ DAL 109–122
Dec 8 · 24% negative · 21% positive · 67 comments
- W vs LAC 115–113
Dec 15 · 33% negative · 13% positive · 199 comments
- L @ DEN 125–128
- L @ NOP 128–133
- W @ DEN 115–101
- L @ SAC 124–125
Dec 22 · 36% negative · 23% positive · 77 comments
- L @ LAC 108–128
- W @ LAL 119–96
- W vs CLE 117–100
Dec 29 · 17% negative · 22% positive · 58 comments
- W vs IND 126–119
- W @ BKN 120–96
- L @ DAL 104–110
Jan 5 · 40% negative · 12% positive · 73 comments
- W vs PHX 100–97
- L @ POR 102–103
- L @ POR 105–111
- L @ SAC 98–111
Jan 12 · 33% negative · 21% positive · 82 comments
- W vs CHI 119–113
- L vs OKC 91–111
- W vs MIN 110–105
- W vs NOP 119–110
Jan 19 · 22% negative · 17% positive · 58 comments
- W vs SAS 111–106
- L @ PHI 122–128
- W @ DET 111–104
Jan 26 · 40% negative · 21% positive · 225 comments
- W vs MEM 108–99
- L vs SAS 99–111
- W @ ATL 104–86
- W vs DAL 111–107
Feb 2 · 38% negative · 18% positive · 153 comments
- W @ IND 118–114
- L vs BOS 93–114
- L vs CHA 99–109
Feb 9 · 29% negative · 10% positive · 42 comments
- W vs LAC 102–95
- L vs LAC 102–105
Feb 16 · 19% negative · 19% positive · 73 comments
- W @ CHA 105–101
- L @ NYK 106–108
Feb 23 · 47% negative · 4% positive · 83 comments
- W vs UTA 125–105
- W @ ORL 113–108
- L @ MIA 105–115
Mar 2 · 12% negative · 30% positive · 33 comments
- W @ WAS 123–118
- L vs GSW 113–115
- W vs POR 106–99
- L @ SAS 120–145
Mar 9 · 28% negative · 13% positive · 67 comments
- W vs TOR 113–99
- L @ DEN 93–129
- W vs NOP 107–105
Mar 16 · 26% negative · 32% positive · 81 comments
- L vs LAL 92–100
- L vs LAL 116–124
- W vs ATL 117–95
- W vs MIA 123–122
Mar 23 · 29% negative · 13% positive · 45 comments
- L @ CHI 124–132
- L @ MIN 108–110
- W @ MEM 119–109
- W @ NOP 134–102
Mar 30 · 21% negative · 12% positive · 58 comments
- W vs NYK 111–94
- W vs MIL 119–113
- W vs UTA 140–106
- W @ GSW 117–116
Apr 6 · 17% negative · 39% positive · 87 comments
- W @ PHX 119–105
- W vs PHI 113–102
- L vs MIN 132–136
Apr 13 · 38% negative · 22% positive · 169 comments
- L @ LAL 98–107
Apr 20 · 44% negative · 15% positive · 294 comments
- L @ LAL 94–101
- L vs LAL 108–112
- W vs LAL 115–96
Apr 27 · 42% negative · 24% positive · 573 comments
- W @ LAL 99–93
- L vs LAL 78–98

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Amen Thompson in 12 of his 88 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −20 in losses (42% negative, 22% positive) against −15 in wins (42% negative, 27% positive), on a season net sentiment of −10.

−15In wins42% neg · 27% pos · 133 comments

−20In losses42% neg · 22% pos · 764 comments

−10His season31% neg · 21% pos · 4,172 comments

Games the room talked about Amen Thompson in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 1R1 G6	R1 G6	vs LALL 78–98	L 78–98	45	18	8	3	7-14	0-0	2	-26	18/8/3	7,226	29 points harsher than his season, from 138 comments.
Apr 29R1 G5	R1 G5	@ LALW 99–93	W 99–93	46	15	7	4	4-14	2-5	3	+5	15/7/4	6,820	16 points harsher than his season, from 54 comments.
Apr 26R1 G4	R1 G4	vs LALW 115–96	W 115–96	41	23	4	7	10-16	0-0	4	+21	23/4/7	4,414	19 points warmer than his season, from 35 comments.
Apr 24R1 G3	R1 G3	vs LALL 108–112	L 108–112	48	26	11	4	8-14	0-1	1	+6	26/11/4	12,328	24 points harsher than his season, from 79 comments.
Apr 21R1 G2	R1 G2	@ LALL 94–101	L 94–101	42	16	5	9	6-10	0-1	3	+1	16/5/9	8,572	35 points harsher than his season, from 51 comments.
Apr 18R1 G1	R1 G1	@ LALL 98–107	L 98–107	43	17	7	7	7-18	0-1	2	0	17/7/7	5,925	21 points harsher than his season, from 62 comments.
Mar 8		@ SASL 120–145	L 120–145	36	23	7	6	8-15	0-1	0	-12	23/7/6	1,731	17 points harsher than his season, from 22 comments.
Jan 28		vs SASL 99–111	L 99–111	36	25	7	4	11-23	0-0	2	-15	25/7/4	1,170	19 points harsher than his season, from 45 comments.
Dec 15		@ DENL 125–128	L 125–128	44	14	12	6	5-13	0-1	1	-3	14/12/6	2,998	10 points harsher than his season, from 51 comments.
Nov 26		@ GSWW 104–100	W 104–100	38	10	14	3	4-12	0-3	2	+2	10/14/3	1,567	10 points harsher than his season, from 44 comments.