Jordan Poole · Court Sentiment

Verdict

45.5%38.8%15.7%

45.5%Negative1,078 comments

38.8%Neutral920 comments

15.7%Positive373 comments

−30Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=2,371 comments about Jordan PooleUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Jordan Poole, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.NOP flair
Well Steve is obviously the reason they didn’t blossom, surely they went elsewhere and dominated, right? Wiseman must be an All-Star by now? Kerr had Jordan Poole as a key rotation player on a Championship team, he must be All-NBA since he’s been freed from Kerr.
Post · [Highlight] Brandin Podziemski throws a bad pass to Will Richard, and Steve Kerr starts yelling at Will.▲ 311Mar 16, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.NYK flair
Any team with Jordan Poole on it is tanking, whether they realize it or not.
Post · [Lowlight] Jordan Poole tries to draw the foul as time expires▲ 107Dec 30, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.GSW flair
I can't take anyone seriously who thinks Jordan Poole is the answer to winning. Clearly you don't watch ball. He's been arguably the worst offensive player in the NBA who was starting since he has left the Wariors(getting DNP's right now). He plays 0 defense. One of the worst players in the league efficiency wise and we got bigs who shoot better from deep than he does.
Post · [Highlight] Ant gives Steph a taste of his own medicine▲ 96Mar 14, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Jordan Poole that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Jordan Poole, his own Pelicans fans are 53% negative, rival fans 45%, unflaired commenters 45%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

53.1%Own fansNOP flair · 130 comments

45.4%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,254 comments

44.6%Unflairedno flair · 987 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Jordan Poole are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Jordan Poole was talked about most on the front page: 1,200 of his 2,371 comments, −25 net sentiment against −30 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −37 on 20% of his comments; his warmest the front page.

Front page51% of his commentsWarmest42.317.41,200

Highlights12% of his comments48.614.6280

News20% of his commentsHarshest46.79.9475

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Jordan Poole; left out here: Game threads (160), Post-game threads (150), Lowlights (96), Discussion posts (5), Injury posts (2). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Jordan Poole ran between 19% and 55%. His worst week was the week of Dec 1, 77% negative of 30 comments; his best the week of Sep 29, 46% positive. 6 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 13 · 48% negative · 13% positive · 31 comments
- L vs HOU 128–130
- L @ ORL 125–132
Oct 20 · 40% negative · 29% positive · 126 comments
- L @ MEM 122–128
- L vs SAS 116–120
Oct 27 · 52% negative · 10% positive · 97 comments
- L vs BOS 90–122
- L @ DEN 88–122
- L @ LAC 124–126
- L @ OKC 106–137
Nov 3 · 54% negative · 19% positive · 48 comments
- W vs CHA 116–112
Dec 8 · 30% negative · 27% positive · 30 comments
- W vs POR 143–120
- W @ CHI 114–104
Dec 15 · 41% negative · 18% positive · 44 comments
- W vs HOU 133–128
- W vs IND 128–109
Dec 22 · 53% negative · 13% positive · 134 comments
- W vs DAL 119–113
- L vs PHX 108–115
- L vs PHX 114–123
Dec 29 · 63% negative · 14% positive · 127 comments
- L vs NYK 125–130
- L @ CHI 118–134
- L vs POR 109–122
- L @ MIA 106–125
Jan 5 · 49% negative · 23% positive · 75 comments
- L vs LAL 103–111
- L @ ATL 100–117
- W @ WAS 128–107
- L @ ORL 118–128
Jan 12 · 47% negative · 11% positive · 47 comments
- L vs DEN 116–122
- W vs BKN 116–113
- L @ IND 119–127
- L @ HOU 110–119
Jan 19 · 44% negative · 22% positive · 167 comments
- L vs DET 104–112
- W @ MEM 133–127
Feb 16 · 48% negative · 22% positive · 54 comments
- L vs MIL 118–139
- W vs PHI 126–111
Feb 23 · 50% negative · 15% positive · 34 comments
- W vs GSW 113–109
- W @ UTA 129–118
- W @ UTA 115–105
Mar 16 · 31% negative · 9% positive · 32 comments
- W vs DAL 129–111
- W vs LAC 105–99
Mar 23 · 23 comments, under the floor
- L @ TOR 106–119
- L vs HOU 102–134
Apr 6 · 27% negative · 27% positive · 30 comments
- W vs UTA 156–137
- L @ BOS 118–144

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Jordan Poole in 3 of his 41 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

—In winstoo few graded wins

−50In losses65% neg · 15% pos · 113 comments

−30His season45% neg · 16% pos · 2,371 comments

Games the room talked about Jordan Poole in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Dec 29	vs NYKL 125–130	L 125–130	26	26	3	2	7-14	4-10	0	-2	26/3/2	304	14 points harsher than his season, from 39 comments.
Dec 26	vs PHXL 108–115	L 108–115	31	19	5	6	7-18	2-11	2	-5	19/5/6	265	19 points harsher than his season, from 35 comments.
Oct 24	vs SASL 116–120	L 116–120	41	21	4	5	8-20	3-9	3	-15	21/4/5	1,347	29 points harsher than his season, from 39 comments.