Dennis Schröder · Court Sentiment

Verdict

45.2%39.6%15.2%

45.2%Negative1,067 comments

39.6%Neutral935 comments

15.2%Positive359 comments

−30Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=2,361 comments about Dennis SchröderUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Dennis Schröder, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.POR flair
Absolutely lol. Schroder is a dumbass
Post · [02/04/2025] Dennis Schröder on the NBA trade deadline: “It’s modern slavery at the end of the day. Everybody can decide where you’re going, even if you have a contract … at the end of the day if they say, ‘You’re not coming to work tomorrow, you’re going over there,’ they can decide that.“▲ 416Feb 1, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
calling Schroeder Negro Nowitzki
Post · Klay Thompson's response post-game to a Rockets reporter mentioning that Reed Sheppard's nickname is 'C*caine Curry': “Whoa...I think Reed's a great shooter. I don’t think anyone should be in the same sentence as Steph though. That's crazy."▲ 172Feb 1, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.GSW flair
One of the ugliest clutch games I've ever seen from Schroder. It felt like every possession he was either turning it over, missing a shot, or getting blocked/stolen from
Post-game thread · CLE 119 @ DET 122 · Feb 27▲ 156Feb 28, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Dennis Schröder that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Dennis Schröder, his own Cavaliers fans are 44% negative, rival fans 43%, unflaired commenters 48%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

43.5%Own fansCLE flair · 200 comments

43.3%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,285 comments

48.3%Unflairedno flair · 876 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Dennis Schröder are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Dennis Schröder was talked about most in the game threads: 718 of his 2,361 comments, −34 net sentiment against −30 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −38 on 25% of his comments; his warmest highlights, −11 on 9% of his comments. The game threads ran 8 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads30% of his comments53.819.4718

Front page29% of his comments38.912.8673

Highlights9% of his commentsWarmest33.822.8219

News25% of his commentsHarshest47.19.1596

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Dennis Schröder; left out here: Post-game threads (142), Lowlights (6), Daily chat thread (4), Discussion posts (1), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Dennis Schröder ran between 20% and 54%. His worst week was the week of Jan 5, 57% negative of 164 comments; his best the week of Dec 22, 50% positive. 19 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L vs TOR 122–130
- L @ POR 123–124
Oct 13 · 19 comments, under the floor
- L vs LAC 91–109
- W @ LAL 117–116
Oct 20 · 25 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHX 116–120
- W vs UTA 105–104
- L vs LAL 120–127
Oct 27 · 50% negative · 10% positive · 50 comments
- L @ OKC 101–107
- L @ CHI 113–126
- W @ MIL 135–133
Nov 3 · 39% negative · 9% positive · 33 comments
- L @ DEN 124–130
- W vs GSW 121–116
- L vs OKC 101–132
- L vs MIN 117–144
Nov 10 · 55% negative · 9% positive · 56 comments
- L vs DEN 108–122
- L vs ATL 100–133
- L @ MIN 110–124
- L @ SAS 110–123
Nov 17 · 34% negative · 25% positive · 32 comments
- L @ OKC 99–113
- L @ MEM 96–137
- W @ DEN 128–123
Nov 24 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIN 117–112
Dec 8 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIN 103–117
Dec 15 · 18 comments, under the floor
- L @ POR 133–134
- L vs POR 93–98
- W vs HOU 125–124
Dec 22 · 16% negative · 50% positive · 56 comments
- L vs DET 127–136
- W vs DAL 113–107
- L @ LAL 101–125
Dec 29 · 45% negative · 16% positive · 91 comments
- L @ LAC 90–131
- L vs BOS 106–120
- L @ PHX 102–129
- L vs MIL 98–115
Jan 5 · 57% negative · 11% positive · 164 comments
- L vs DAL 98–100
- L @ GSW 103–137
Jan 12 · 46% negative · 9% positive · 85 comments
- W vs WAS 128–115
- L vs POR 110–117
Jan 19 · 21 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIA 117–130
- L vs TOR 109–122
- L @ CLE 118–123
- L @ DET 116–139
Jan 26 · 52% negative · 7% positive · 243 comments
- L @ NYK 87–103
- L @ PHI 111–113
- L @ BOS 93–112
Feb 2 · 30% negative · 23% positive · 122 comments
- W @ LAC 124–91
- W @ SAC 132–126
Feb 9 · 36% negative · 12% positive · 33 comments
- W @ DEN 119–117
- W vs WAS 138–113
Feb 16 · 33% negative · 18% positive · 60 comments
- W vs BKN 112–84
- W @ CHA 118–113
- L @ OKC 113–121
Feb 23 · 53% negative · 13% positive · 126 comments
- W vs NYK 109–94
- L @ MIL 116–118
- L @ DET 119–122
- W @ BKN 106–102
Mar 2 · 51% negative · 26% positive · 39 comments
- W vs DET 113–109
- L vs BOS 98–109
Mar 9 · 23% negative · 17% positive · 30 comments
- W vs PHI 115–101
- L @ ORL 122–128
- W @ DAL 138–105
- L vs DAL 120–130
Mar 16 · 27 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIL 123–116
- W @ CHI 115–110
- W @ NOP 111–106
Mar 23 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W vs ORL 136–131
- L vs MIA 103–120
- W vs MIA 149–128
Mar 30 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W @ UTA 122–113
- L @ LAL 113–127
- W @ GSW 118–111
- W vs IND 117–108
Apr 6 · 16 comments, under the floor
- W @ MEM 142–126
- W vs ATL 122–116
- L @ ATL 102–124
Apr 13 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W vs TOR 126–113
Apr 20 · 44% negative · 20% positive · 79 comments
- W vs TOR 115–105
- L @ TOR 104–126
- L @ TOR 89–93
Apr 27 · 36% negative · 32% positive · 129 comments
- W vs TOR 125–120
- L @ TOR 110–112
- W vs TOR 114–102
May 4 · 47% negative · 20% positive · 191 comments
- L @ DET 101–111
- L @ DET 97–107
- W vs DET 116–109
May 11 · 57% negative · 11% positive · 121 comments
- W vs DET 112–103
- W @ DET 117–113
- L vs DET 94–115
- W @ DET 125–94
May 18 · 55% negative · 16% positive · 233 comments
- L @ NYK 104–115
- L @ NYK 93–109
- L vs NYK 108–121

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Dennis Schröder in 11 of his 91 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −53 in losses (66% negative, 13% positive) against −18 in wins (45% negative, 26% positive), on a season net sentiment of −30.

−18In wins45% neg · 26% pos · 208 comments

−53In losses66% neg · 13% pos · 299 comments

−30His season45% neg · 15% pos · 2,361 comments

Games the room talked about Dennis Schröder in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 21R3 G2	R3 G2	@ NYKL 93–109	L 93–109	18	4	4	3	2-5	0-1	0	0	4/4/3	7,682	43 points harsher than his season, from 30 comments.
May 19R3 G1	R3 G1	@ NYKL 104–115	L 104–115	18	3	0	5	1-9	1-4	0	+1	3/0/5	19,144	26 points harsher than his season, from 75 comments.
May 17R2 G7	R2 G7	@ DETW 125–94	W 125–94	18	2	3	3	1-1	0-0	2	+12	2/3/3	17,494	11 points harsher than his season, from 49 comments.
May 15R2 G6	R2 G6	vs DETL 94–115	L 94–115	15	0	2	3	0-4	0-1	3	-4	0/2/3	9,941	37 points harsher than his season, from 51 comments.
May 9R2 G3	R2 G3	vs DETW 116–109	W 116–109	22	11	1	2	4-5	3-3	2	0	11/1/2	7,027	7 points warmer than his season, from 73 comments.
May 7R2 G2	R2 G2	@ DETL 97–107	L 97–107	20	4	3	5	1-5	0-2	2	-4	4/3/5	7,260	At his season, from 27 comments.
May 5R2 G1	R2 G1	@ DETL 101–111	L 101–111	16	9	1	3	3-6	1-1	4	0	9/1/3	5,785	17 points warmer than his season, from 23 comments.
May 3R1 G7	R1 G7	vs TORW 114–102	W 114–102	14	2	1	1	1-7	0-2	0	-11	2/1/1	11,149	4 points warmer than his season, from 39 comments.
May 1R1 G6	R1 G6	@ TORL 110–112	L 110–112	16	7	0	1	0-4	0-1	2	-9	7/0/1	6,047	7 points harsher than his season, from 30 comments.
Apr 29R1 G5	R1 G5	vs TORW 125–120	W 125–120	21	19	0	2	7-11	3-6	0	+8	19/0/2	3,719	49 points warmer than his season, from 47 comments.