Jaxson Hayes · Court Sentiment

Verdict

44.9%36.5%18.5%

44.9%Negative1,594 comments

36.5%Neutral1,296 comments

18.5%Positive658 comments

−26Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=3,548 comments about Jaxson HayesUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Jaxson Hayes, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.BOS flair
We can only hope. Hayes is a pos
Post · [Highlight] Zion TRUCKS Jackson Hayes who is trying to take the charge and the refs decide not to call anything on the play▲ 351Mar 4, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.MIN flair
Hayes isn't beating the DV allegations It's the only thing he doesn't beat
Post · Jaxon Hayes shoving the wizards mascot▲ 249Feb 4, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
Jaxson Hayes beat his gf to a pulp and he's ass at basketball
Post · [Lorenzi] Jaden Ivey reportedly told the Bulls’ head of player performance on March 25 that Jesus healed his knee and he was ready to play, He underwent an MRI the next day, and Chicago shut him down for the season.▲ 171Apr 1, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Jaxson Hayes that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Jaxson Hayes, his own Lakers fans are 37% negative, rival fans 49%, unflaired commenters 45%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

37.5%Own fansLAL flair · 827 comments

49.1%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,400 comments

45.2%Unflairedno flair · 1,321 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Jaxson Hayes are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Jaxson Hayes was talked about most in the game threads: 1,229 of his 3,548 comments, −26 net sentiment against −26 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −33 on 15% of his comments; his warmest highlights, −18 on 14% of his comments.

Game threads35% of his comments48.422.71,229

Front page30% of his comments43.314.81,076

Highlights14% of his commentsWarmest39.421.8482

News15% of his commentsHarshest46.513.6516

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Jaxson Hayes; left out here: Post-game threads (176), Injury posts (33), Daily chat thread (16), Lowlights (16), Discussion posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Jaxson Hayes ran between 29% and 52%. His worst week was the week of Apr 13, 60% negative of 65 comments; his best the week of Jan 26, 38% positive. 7 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 47% negative · 15% positive · 55 comments
- L vs PHX 81–103
- L @ GSW 103–111
Oct 6 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W vs GSW 126–116
Oct 13 · 44% negative · 16% positive · 77 comments
- L vs DAL 94–121
- L vs SAC 116–117
Oct 20 · 46% negative · 20% positive · 80 comments
- L vs GSW 109–119
Oct 27 · 48% negative · 15% positive · 117 comments
- W @ MIN 116–115
- W @ MEM 117–112
- W vs MIA 130–120
Nov 3 · 37% negative · 26% positive · 168 comments
- W @ POR 123–115
- W vs SAS 118–116
- L @ ATL 102–122
Nov 10 · 41% negative · 18% positive · 74 comments
- W @ CHA 121–111
- L @ OKC 92–121
- W @ NOP 118–104
- W @ MIL 119–95
Nov 17 · 53% negative · 18% positive · 45 comments
- W vs UTA 140–126
- W @ UTA 108–106
Nov 24 · 44% negative · 20% positive · 228 comments
- W vs LAC 135–118
- W vs DAL 129–119
- W vs NOP 133–121
Dec 1 · 30% negative · 19% positive · 47 comments
- L vs PHX 108–125
- W @ TOR 123–120
- L @ BOS 105–126
- W @ PHI 112–108
Dec 8 · 50% negative · 15% positive · 74 comments
- L vs SAS 119–132
- W @ PHX 116–114
Dec 15 · 42% negative · 23% positive · 52 comments
- W @ UTA 143–135
- L @ LAC 88–103
Dec 22 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHX 108–132
Dec 29 · 43% negative · 23% positive · 69 comments
- L vs DET 106–128
- W vs MEM 128–121
- W vs MEM 120–114
Jan 5 · 44% negative · 16% positive · 43 comments
- W @ NOP 111–103
- L @ SAS 91–107
- L vs MIL 101–105
Jan 12 · 56% negative · 9% positive · 34 comments
- L @ SAC 112–124
- W vs TOR 110–93
Jan 19 · 50% negative · 7% positive · 44 comments
- W @ DEN 115–107
- L @ LAC 104–112
- W @ DAL 116–110
Jan 26 · 27% negative · 38% positive · 104 comments
- W @ CHI 129–118
- L @ CLE 99–129
- W @ WAS 142–111
- L @ NYK 100–112
Feb 2 · 50% negative · 13% positive · 114 comments
- W @ BKN 125–109
- W vs GSW 105–99
Feb 9 · 54% negative · 12% positive · 422 comments
- L vs OKC 110–119
- L vs SAS 108–136
- W vs DAL 124–104
Feb 16 · 40% negative · 11% positive · 83 comments
- W vs LAC 125–122
- L vs BOS 89–111
Feb 23 · 53% negative · 17% positive · 103 comments
- L @ PHX 110–113
- W @ GSW 129–101
- W vs SAC 128–104
Mar 2 · 46% negative · 18% positive · 102 comments
- W vs NOP 110–101
- L @ DEN 113–120
- W vs IND 128–117
- W vs NYK 110–97
Mar 9 · 59% negative · 10% positive · 61 comments
- W vs DEN 127–125
Mar 16 · 39% negative · 17% positive · 72 comments
- W @ HOU 100–92
- W @ HOU 124–116
- W @ MIA 134–126
- W @ ORL 105–104
Mar 23 · 45% negative · 18% positive · 33 comments
- L @ DET 110–113
- W @ IND 137–130
- W vs BKN 116–99
Mar 30 · 49% negative · 21% positive · 70 comments
- W vs WAS 120–101
- W vs CLE 127–113
- L @ OKC 96–139
- L @ DAL 128–134
Apr 13 · 60% negative · 12% positive · 65 comments
- W vs HOU 107–98
Apr 20 · 41% negative · 27% positive · 236 comments
- W vs HOU 101–94
- W @ HOU 112–108
- L @ HOU 96–115
Apr 27 · 55% negative · 18% positive · 91 comments
- L vs HOU 93–99
- W @ HOU 98–78
May 4 · 52% negative · 4% positive · 246 comments
- L @ OKC 90–108
- L @ OKC 107–125
- L vs OKC 108–131
May 11 · 31% negative · 36% positive · 286 comments
- L vs OKC 110–115

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Jaxson Hayes in 12 of his 81 games, at least 20 comments each. It was no different after losses: net sentiment −20 in losses (44% negative, 24% positive) against −20 in wins (49% negative, 28% positive), on a season net sentiment of −26.

−20In wins49% neg · 28% pos · 301 comments

−20In losses44% neg · 24% pos · 429 comments

−26His season45% neg · 19% pos · 3,548 comments

Games the room talked about Jaxson Hayes in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 11R2 G4	R2 G4	vs OKCL 110–115	L 110–115	27	18	5	1	6-8	0-0	1	-1	18/5/1	13,015	39 points warmer than his season, from 192 comments.
May 7R2 G2	R2 G2	@ OKCL 107–125	L 107–125	15	6	3	2	3-3	0-0	2	-11	6/3/2	21,807	28 points harsher than his season, from 72 comments.
May 5R2 G1	R2 G1	@ OKCL 90–108	L 90–108	16	3	6	1	1-3	0-0	3	-12	3/6/1	11,399	23 points harsher than his season, from 77 comments.
May 1R1 G6	R1 G6	@ HOUW 98–78	W 98–78	17	5	4	1	1-1	0-0	1	+21	5/4/1	7,226	26 points warmer than his season, from 21 comments.
Apr 26R1 G4	R1 G4	@ HOUL 96–115	L 96–115	15	2	2	0	1-2	0-0	0	-4	2/2/0	4,414	35 points harsher than his season, from 26 comments.
Apr 24R1 G3	R1 G3	@ HOUW 112–108	W 112–108	20	12	4	0	5-8	0-0	1	+7	12/4/0	12,328	11 points warmer than his season, from 122 comments.
Apr 21R1 G2	R1 G2	vs HOUW 101–94	W 101–94	21	6	4	1	1-2	0-1	0	+12	6/4/1	8,572	14 points warmer than his season, from 33 comments.
Mar 5		@ DENL 113–120	L 113–120	27	19	5	2	8-10	0-0	0	+7	19/5/2	1,975	1 point harsher than his season, from 22 comments.
Nov 25		vs LACW 135–118	W 135–118	30	8	4	3	3-4	0-0	1	+21	8/4/3	4,115	3 points warmer than his season, from 72 comments.
Nov 2		vs MIAW 130–120	W 130–120	32	15	5	1	7-7	1-1	1	+17	15/5/1	916	13 points warmer than his season, from 29 comments.