2025-26

Harrison Barnes

SAS · F · #40

Unofficial: 4,042 comments, 958 short of the official minimum of 5,000. Among all 223 tracked players he would rank 76th most discussed.

PPG: 9.9
RPG: 2.8
APG: 1.9
GP: 78

Height: 6′7″
Weight: 225 lb
Age: 34
Born: May 30, 1992
Experience: 13 yrs
From: North Carolina

Verdict

37.8%39.9%22.3%

37.8%Negative1,526 comments

39.9%Neutral1,614 comments

22.3%Positive902 comments

−15Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=4,042 comments about Harrison BarnesUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Harrison Barnes, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
This is insane, he could have killed him, make it NSFW Gulag for Barnes, actually make it worse, send him back to Sacramento!!!
Post · [Highlight] Harrison Barnes called for a foul on Isaiah Joe▲ 151May 21, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
more like Harrison "can't hit the side of" Barnes
Post · Harrison “Mr. Clutch” Barnes went 0-12 from 3s in the IST semi finals and finals▲ 27Dec 17, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.SAS flair
Harrison Barnes should be suspended for the rest of the playoffs. Isaiah Joe could've died
Post · Isaiah Joe draws offensive foul on Harrison Barnes on a made Spurs 3-pointer▲ 26May 21, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Harrison Barnes that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Harrison Barnes, his own Spurs fans are 36% negative, rival fans 39%, unflaired commenters 36%. Among the 3 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Warriors fans are hardest on him at 46% negative and Raptors fans kindest at 36% positive.

36.4%Own fansSAS flair · 693 comments

39.3%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,919 comments

36.4%Unflairedno flair · 1,430 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Harrison Barnes are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Harrison Barnes was talked about most in the game threads: 1,553 of his 4,042 comments, −25 net sentiment against −15 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads; his warmest highlights, −6 on 10% of his comments. The game threads ran 18 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads38% of his commentsHarshest46.721.41,553

Post-game threads6% of his comments35.228.7247

Front page34% of his comments30.423.61,380

Highlights10% of his commentsWarmest32.025.6403

News9% of his comments36.514.4348

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Harrison Barnes; left out here: Injury posts (39), Lowlights (29), Daily chat thread (27), Discussion posts (14). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Harrison Barnes ran between 19% and 48%. His worst week was the week of Dec 8, 57% negative of 211 comments; his best the week of Nov 17, 45% positive. 5 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 10 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIA 112–107
- W vs UTA 134–130
Oct 13 · 35% negative · 13% positive · 31 comments
- W @ IND 124–108
- W vs IND 133–104
Oct 20 · 38% negative · 21% positive · 39 comments
- W @ DAL 125–92
- W @ NOP 120–116
- W vs BKN 118–107
Oct 27 · 26% negative · 21% positive · 47 comments
- W vs TOR 121–103
- W vs MIA 107–101
- L @ PHX 118–130
Nov 3 · 35% negative · 34% positive · 95 comments
- L @ LAL 116–118
- W vs HOU 121–110
- W vs NOP 126–119
Nov 10 · 21% negative · 37% positive · 70 comments
- W @ CHI 121–117
- L vs GSW 120–125
- L vs GSW 108–109
- W vs SAC 123–110
Nov 17 · 19% negative · 45% positive · 126 comments
- W vs MEM 111–101
- W vs ATL 135–126
- L @ PHX 102–111
Nov 24 · 15% negative · 30% positive · 47 comments
- W @ POR 115–102
- W @ DEN 139–136
- L @ MIN 112–125
Dec 1 · 19% negative · 32% positive · 90 comments
- W vs MEM 126–119
- W @ ORL 114–112
- L @ CLE 117–130
Dec 8 · 57% negative · 18% positive · 211 comments
- W @ NOP 135–132
- W @ LAL 132–119
- W vs OKC 111–109
Dec 15 · 55% negative · 14% positive · 194 comments
- L vs NYK 113–124
- W vs WAS 119–94
- W @ ATL 126–98
- W @ WAS 124–113
Dec 22 · 35% negative · 31% positive · 171 comments
- W vs OKC 130–110
- W @ OKC 117–102
- L vs UTA 114–127
Dec 29 · 39% negative · 18% positive · 92 comments
- L vs CLE 101–113
- W vs NYK 134–132
- W @ IND 123–113
- L vs POR 110–115
Jan 5 · 28% negative · 13% positive · 40 comments
- L @ MEM 105–106
- W vs LAL 107–91
- W @ BOS 100–95
- L @ MIN 103–104
Jan 12 · 55% negative · 17% positive · 105 comments
- L @ OKC 98–119
- W vs MIL 119–101
- W vs MIN 126–123
Jan 19 · 43% negative · 13% positive · 46 comments
- W vs UTA 123–110
- L @ HOU 106–111
- W @ UTA 126–109
- L vs NOP 95–104
Jan 26 · 36% negative · 26% positive · 138 comments
- W @ HOU 111–99
- L @ CHA 106–111
- W vs ORL 112–103
Feb 2 · 31% negative · 14% positive · 65 comments
- W vs OKC 116–106
- W @ DAL 135–123
- W vs DAL 138–125
Feb 9 · 34% negative · 26% positive · 53 comments
- W @ LAL 136–108
- W @ GSW 126–113
Feb 16 · 23% negative · 30% positive · 30 comments
- W vs PHX 121–94
- W vs SAC 139–122
Feb 23 · 41% negative · 17% positive · 69 comments
- W @ DET 114–103
- W @ TOR 110–107
- W @ BKN 126–110
- L @ NYK 89–114
Mar 9 · 26% negative · 28% positive · 43 comments
- L vs DEN 131–136
- W vs CHA 115–102
Mar 16 · 30% negative · 21% positive · 33 comments
- W @ LAC 119–115
- W @ SAC 132–104
- W vs PHX 101–100
- W vs IND 134–119
Mar 23 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIA 136–111
- W @ MEM 123–98
- W @ MIL 127–95
Mar 30 · 38% negative · 21% positive · 63 comments
- W vs CHI 129–114
- W @ GSW 127–113
- W @ LAC 118–99
- L @ DEN 134–136
Apr 6 · 12% negative · 20% positive · 41 comments
- W vs PHI 115–102
- W vs POR 112–101
- W vs DAL 139–120
- L vs DEN 118–128
Apr 13 · 39% negative · 23% positive · 64 comments
- W vs POR 111–98
Apr 20 · 33% negative · 30% positive · 162 comments
- L vs POR 103–106
- W @ POR 120–108
- W @ POR 114–93
Apr 27 · 29% negative · 36% positive · 173 comments
- W vs POR 114–95
May 4 · 34% negative · 23% positive · 189 comments
- L vs MIN 102–104
- W vs MIN 133–95
- W @ MIN 115–108
- L @ MIN 109–114
May 11 · 30% negative · 23% positive · 129 comments
- W vs MIN 126–97
- W @ MIN 139–109
May 18 · 41% negative · 18% positive · 337 comments
- W @ OKC 122–115
- L @ OKC 113–122
- L vs OKC 108–123
- W vs OKC 103–82
May 25 · 37% negative · 24% positive · 394 comments
- L @ OKC 114–127
- W vs OKC 118–91
- W @ OKC 111–103
Jun 1 · 55% negative · 8% positive · 285 comments
- L vs NYK 95–105
- L vs NYK 104–105

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Harrison Barnes in 13 of his 102 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −43 in losses (55% negative, 12% positive) against −16 in wins (44% negative, 28% positive), on a season net sentiment of −15.

−16In wins44% neg · 28% pos · 489 comments

−43In losses55% neg · 12% pos · 429 comments

−15His season38% neg · 22% pos · 4,042 comments

Games the room talked about Harrison Barnes in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Jun 3R4 G1	R4 G1	vs NYKL 95–105	L 95–105	12	0	2	1	0-2	0-2	0	-2	0/2/1	45,156	36 points harsher than his season, from 156 comments.
May 30R3 G7	R3 G7	@ OKCW 111–103	W 111–103	3	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0	-5	0/0/0	51,944	27 points harsher than his season, from 49 comments.
May 28R3 G6	R3 G6	vs OKCW 118–91	W 118–91	13	6	1	0	2-4	2-4	1	+5	6/1/0	21,522	13 points warmer than his season, from 51 comments.
May 26R3 G5	R3 G5	@ OKCL 114–127	L 114–127	4	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0	-6	0/0/0	25,748	2 points harsher than his season, from 23 comments.
May 24R3 G4	R3 G4	vs OKCW 103–82	W 103–82	16	5	3	0	0-4	0-2	1	+13	5/3/0	20,926	12 points warmer than his season, from 104 comments.
May 20R3 G2	R3 G2	@ OKCL 113–122	L 113–122	12	5	3	0	1-2	1-2	2	-1	5/3/0	35,453	8 points warmer than his season, from 98 comments.
Jan 13		@ OKCL 98–119	L 98–119	24	2	0	1	1-7	0-5	0	-1	2/0/1	4,457	45 points harsher than his season, from 43 comments.
Dec 31		vs NYKW 134–132	W 134–132	26	7	6	4	2-6	0-1	2	+16	7/6/4	1,892	19 points harsher than his season, from 29 comments.
Dec 25		@ OKCW 117–102	W 117–102	30	15	6	1	5-12	3-7	1	+2	15/6/1	8,201	10 points warmer than his season, from 78 comments.
Dec 16		vs NYKL 113–124	L 113–124	23	11	3	2	4-9	0-4	0	+4	11/3/2	8,936	46 points harsher than his season, from 109 comments.