Duncan Robinson · Court Sentiment

Verdict

37.8%40.3%22.0%

37.8%Negative373 comments

40.3%Neutral398 comments

22.0%Positive217 comments

−16Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=988 comments about Duncan RobinsonUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Duncan Robinson, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
The only one that’s ever been worse in my league was Duncan Robinson in 2023: 0/7 FG, 1 pt, 1 ast, 6 TO, 4 PF
Post · Keyonte George with one of the worst stat lines you will ever see: 0 points on 0/6 FG, 1 rebound, 2 assists, 8 turnovers, -27 in 19 minutes▲ 9Dec 1, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.GSW flair
Duncan robinson grab the fcking rebound you’re fcking 6’7 not some tiny ass guard. Holy shit he just watched the ball instead of hustling for it
Game thread · ORL 109 @ DET 116 · R1 G5 · Apr 29▲ 6Apr 30, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.TOR flair
duncan robinson you were fucking trash
Post-game thread · DET 109 @ DEN 107 · Jan 27▲ 5Jan 28, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Duncan Robinson that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Duncan Robinson, his own Pistons fans are 33% negative, rival fans 39%, unflaired commenters 37%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

32.7%Own fansDET flair · 113 comments

39.2%Rival fansevery other flair · 541 comments

37.1%Unflairedno flair · 334 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Duncan Robinson are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Duncan Robinson was talked about most in the game threads: 418 of his 988 comments, −28 net sentiment against −16 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads; his warmest the front page, −3 on 27% of his comments. The game threads ran 25 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads42% of his commentsHarshest48.620.3418

Front page27% of his commentsWarmest29.826.3262

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Duncan Robinson; left out here: Highlights (142), News (106), Post-game threads (53), Lowlights (3), Daily chat thread (2), Discussion posts (1), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Duncan Robinson ran between 19% and 50%. His worst week was the week of Apr 27, 56% negative of 154 comments; his best the week of Jun 22, 33% positive. 32 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W @ MEM 128–112
- L @ MIL 111–117
Oct 13 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L @ CLE 100–118
- W vs WAS 119–98
Oct 20 · 18 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHI 111–115
- W @ HOU 115–111
- W vs BOS 119–113
Oct 27 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L vs CLE 95–116
- W vs ORL 135–116
- W vs DAL 122–110
Nov 3 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W @ MEM 114–106
- W vs UTA 114–103
- W @ BKN 125–107
- W @ PHI 111–108
Nov 10 · 22 comments, under the floor
- W vs WAS 137–135
- W vs CHI 124–113
- W vs PHI 114–105
Nov 17 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W vs IND 127–112
- W @ ATL 120–112
- W @ MIL 129–116
Nov 24 · 12 comments, under the floor
- W @ IND 122–117
- L @ BOS 114–117
- L vs ORL 109–112
- W @ MIA 138–135
Dec 1 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W vs POR 122–116
- W vs MIL 124–112
Dec 8 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W vs ATL 142–115
Dec 15 · 6 comments, under the floor
- W @ BOS 112–105
- L @ DAL 114–116
- W vs CHA 112–86
Dec 22 · 6 comments, under the floor
- W @ POR 110–102
- W @ SAC 136–127
- L @ UTA 129–131
- L @ LAC 99–112
Dec 29 · 18 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAL 128–106
- L vs MIA 112–118
- W @ CLE 114–110
Jan 5 · 10 comments, under the floor
- W vs NYK 121–90
- W vs CHI 108–93
- L vs LAC 92–98
Jan 12 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W vs PHX 108–105
- W vs IND 121–78
Jan 19 · 10 comments, under the floor
- W vs BOS 104–103
- W @ NOP 112–104
- L vs HOU 104–111
- W vs SAC 139–116
Jan 26 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W @ DEN 109–107
- L @ PHX 96–114
- W @ GSW 131–124
- W vs BKN 130–77
Feb 2 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W vs DEN 124–121
- L vs WAS 117–126
- W vs NYK 118–80
Feb 9 · 34% negative · 21% positive · 62 comments
- W @ CHA 110–104
- W @ TOR 113–95
Feb 16 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W @ NYK 126–111
- W @ CHI 126–110
Feb 23 · 26% negative · 26% positive · 47 comments
- L vs SAS 103–114
- W vs OKC 124–116
- W vs CLE 122–119
- W @ ORL 106–92
Mar 2 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L @ CLE 109–113
- L @ SAS 106–121
- L vs BKN 105–107
- L @ MIA 110–121
Mar 9 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 138–100
- W vs PHI 131–109
- W vs MEM 126–110
- L @ TOR 108–119
Mar 16 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W @ WAS 130–117
- W @ WAS 117–95
- W vs GSW 115–101
Mar 23 · 13 comments, under the floor
- W vs LAL 113–110
- L vs ATL 129–130
- W @ MIN 109–87
Mar 30 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W vs TOR 127–116
- W vs MIN 113–108
- W @ PHI 116–93
Apr 6 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIL 137–111
- W @ CHA 118–100
- W @ IND 133–121
Apr 13 · 19 comments, under the floor
- L vs ORL 101–112
Apr 20 · 48% negative · 6% positive · 48 comments
- W vs ORL 98–83
- L @ ORL 105–113
Apr 27 · 56% negative · 16% positive · 154 comments
- L @ ORL 88–94
- W vs ORL 116–109
- W @ ORL 93–79
- W vs ORL 116–94
May 4 · 43% negative · 28% positive · 141 comments
- W vs CLE 111–101
- W vs CLE 107–97
- L @ CLE 109–116
May 11 · 37% negative · 25% positive · 71 comments
- L @ CLE 103–112
- W @ CLE 115–94
- L vs CLE 94–125

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Duncan Robinson in 9 of his 94 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −44 in losses (60% negative, 16% positive) against −18 in wins (45% negative, 28% positive), on a season net sentiment of −16.

−18In wins45% neg · 28% pos · 185 comments

−44In losses60% neg · 16% pos · 107 comments

−16His season38% neg · 22% pos · 988 comments

Games the room talked about Duncan Robinson in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 17R2 G7	R2 G7	vs CLEL 94–125	L 94–125	22	13	1	1	4-7	3-5	3	-20	13/1/1	17,494	15 points harsher than his season, from 46 comments.
May 15R2 G6	R2 G6	@ CLEW 115–94	W 115–94	20	14	2	2	4-7	4-7	0	+3	14/2/2	9,941	39 points warmer than his season, from 30 comments.
May 9R2 G3	R2 G3	@ CLEL 109–116	L 109–116	36	15	3	4	5-9	4-7	0	+1	15/3/4	7,027	22 points harsher than his season, from 32 comments.
May 7R2 G2	R2 G2	vs CLEW 107–97	W 107–97	37	17	3	3	6-12	5-9	1	+5	17/3/3	7,260	24 points warmer than his season, from 35 comments.
May 5R2 G1	R2 G1	vs CLEW 111–101	W 111–101	28	19	0	2	7-12	5-8	0	+6	19/0/2	5,785	7 points harsher than his season, from 31 comments.
May 3R1 G7	R1 G7	vs ORLW 116–94	W 116–94	36	10	6	3	4-13	2-10	1	+15	10/6/3	7,685	31 points harsher than his season, from 34 comments.
May 1R1 G6	R1 G6	@ ORLW 93–79	W 93–79	36	14	5	3	5-11	4-9	2	+24	14/5/3	9,828	4 points harsher than his season, from 35 comments.
Apr 29R1 G5	R1 G5	vs ORLW 116–109	W 116–109	25	12	3	1	4-8	3-6	1	+2	12/3/1	5,060	49 points harsher than his season, from 20 comments.
Apr 27R1 G4	R1 G4	@ ORLL 88–94	L 88–94	29	7	1	0	2-8	1-6	1	-18	7/1/0	9,701	57 points harsher than his season, from 29 comments.