Franz Wagner · Court Sentiment

Verdict

31.3%44.8%24.0%

31.3%Negative831 comments

44.8%Neutral1,190 comments

24.0%Positive637 comments

−7Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=2,658 comments about Franz WagnerUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Franz Wagner, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.BOS flair
Franz has now had 3 straight postseasons where he’s been complete ass
Post · Paolo and Franz both being complete non-threats from three makes it impossible to build around them▲ 90Apr 16, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.PHI flair
Exactly, because franz just had one of his best seasons from 3 ever! 34.8% on 4.0 attempts…
Post · Paolo and Franz both being complete non-threats from three makes it impossible to build around them▲ 26Apr 16, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.ORL flair
> trade Franz How about go fuck yourself?
Post · Paolo Banchero since being asked about his team impact: 2 GP 11.5/4/2.5 on 38/0/87.5▲ 14Dec 27, 2025Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Franz Wagner that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Franz Wagner, his own Magic fans are 28% negative, rival fans 31%, unflaired commenters 34%. Among the 2 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Knicks fans are hardest on him at 37% negative and Magic fans kindest at 26% positive.

28.0%Own fansORL flair · 642 comments

30.8%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,136 comments

34.2%Unflairedno flair · 880 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Franz Wagner are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Franz Wagner was talked about most on the front page: 1,020 of his 2,658 comments, −6 net sentiment against −7 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads, −15 on 32% of his comments; his warmest the post-game threads, +4 on 10% of his comments. The game threads ran 9 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads32% of his commentsHarshest37.022.0844

Post-game threads10% of his commentsWarmest26.931.3275

Front page38% of his comments28.923.31,020

Highlights9% of his comments31.327.0230

News9% of his comments25.724.5241

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Franz Wagner; left out here: Daily chat thread (19), Lowlights (16), Injury posts (6), Discussion posts (2). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Franz Wagner ran between 12% and 54%. His worst week was the week of May 18, 55% negative of 75 comments; his best the week of Nov 10, 56% positive. 21 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W @ PHI 128–98
- W vs MIA 120–104
Oct 13 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W vs NOP 132–125
Oct 20 · 16% negative · 43% positive · 68 comments
- W vs MIA 125–121
- L vs ATL 107–111
- L vs CHI 98–110
Oct 27 · 49% negative · 26% positive · 78 comments
- L @ PHI 124–136
- L @ DET 116–135
- W @ CHA 123–107
- W @ WAS 125–94
Nov 3 · 28 comments, under the floor
- L @ ATL 112–127
- W vs BOS 123–110
- L vs BOS 107–111
Nov 10 · 20% negative · 56% positive · 75 comments
- W vs POR 115–112
- W @ NYK 124–107
- W vs BKN 105–98
- L @ HOU 113–117
Nov 17 · 18% negative · 48% positive · 95 comments
- W vs GSW 121–113
- W vs LAC 129–101
- W vs NYK 133–121
- L @ BOS 129–138
Nov 24 · 23% negative · 39% positive · 69 comments
- W @ PHI 144–103
- W @ DET 112–109
Dec 1 · 27% negative · 22% positive · 103 comments
- W vs CHI 125–120
- L vs SAS 112–114
- W vs MIA 106–105
- L @ NYK 100–106
Jan 12 · 26% negative · 28% positive · 46 comments
- W vs MEM 118–111
- L vs MEM 109–126
Feb 9 · 47% negative · 18% positive · 38 comments
- W vs MIL 118–99
- L vs MIL 108–116
Mar 30 · 22 comments, under the floor
- L vs ATL 101–130
- W @ DAL 138–127
- W @ NOP 112–108
Apr 6 · 19 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIN 132–120
- W @ CHI 127–103
- L @ BOS 108–113
Apr 13 · 49% negative · 12% positive · 196 comments
- L @ PHI 97–109
- W vs CHA 121–90
- W @ DET 112–101
Apr 20 · 21% negative · 44% positive · 264 comments
- L @ DET 83–98
- W vs DET 113–105
Apr 27 · 35% negative · 14% positive · 697 comments
- W vs DET 94–88

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Franz Wagner in 5 of his 43 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −42 in losses (56% negative, 13% positive) against +7 in wins (29% negative, 37% positive), on a season net sentiment of −7.

+7In wins29% neg · 37% pos · 350 comments

−42In losses56% neg · 13% pos · 45 comments

−7His season31% neg · 24% pos · 2,658 comments

Games the room talked about Franz Wagner in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 27R1 G4	R1 G4	vs DETW 94–88	W 94–88	24	19	5	3	7-15	1-3	0	+17	19/5/3	9,701	17 points harsher than his season, from 97 comments.
Apr 25R1 G3	R1 G3	vs DETW 113–105	W 113–105	34	17	5	6	7-18	1-2	1	+19	17/5/6	5,205	27 points warmer than his season, from 93 comments.
Apr 19R1 G1	R1 G1	@ DETW 112–101	W 112–101	32	19	5	4	7-13	1-2	3	+9	19/5/4	5,011	25 points warmer than his season, from 133 comments.
Apr 15Play-in	Play-in	@ PHIL 97–109	L 97–109	29	12	4	3	5-11	0-2	0	+1	12/4/3	4,498	35 points harsher than his season, from 45 comments.
Nov 12		@ NYKW 124–107	W 124–107	37	28	9	4	10-22	2-7	0	+21	28/9/4	547	41 points warmer than his season, from 27 comments.