2025-26

Cason Wallace

OKC · G · #22

Unofficial: 2,456 comments, 2,544 short of the official minimum of 5,000. Among all 223 tracked players he would rank 24th most loved.

PPG: 8.6
RPG: 3.1
APG: 2.6
GP: 77

Height: 6′3″
Weight: 195 lb
Age: 22
Born: Nov 7, 2003
Experience: 2 yrs
From: Kentucky

Verdict

21.7%42.0%36.3%

21.7%Negative533 comments

42.0%Neutral1,031 comments

36.3%Positive892 comments

+15Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=2,456 comments about Cason WallaceUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Cason Wallace, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.SAS flair
That egregious foul bait by Wallace is why everyone outside of Oklahoma hates the thunder. It makes the NBA a garbage product. That should be 2 free throws and spurs ball just for pulling that shit.
Post · Daily Discussion Thread + Game Thread Index | Playoffs▲ 11May 23, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.TOR flair
Love seeing Cason Wallace get cooked. Hope his toilet gets clogged
Game thread · OKC 91 @ SAS 118 · R3 G6 · May 28▲ 8May 29, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.SAS flair
Wallace bitch ass out there playing football
Game thread · SAS 114 @ OKC 127 · R3 G5 · May 26▲ 6May 27, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Cason Wallace that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Cason Wallace, his own Thunder fans are 15% negative, rival fans 24%, unflaired commenters 25%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

14.9%Own fansOKC flair · 645 comments

23.8%Rival fansevery other flair · 997 comments

24.6%Unflairedno flair · 814 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Cason Wallace are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Cason Wallace was talked about most in the game threads: 898 of his 2,456 comments, +20 net sentiment against +15 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −5 on 9% of his comments; his warmest the game threads. The game threads ran 5 points warmer than the front page.

Game threads37% of his commentsWarmest22.942.7898

Front page34% of his comments19.133.8831

Highlights11% of his comments23.228.5263

News9% of his commentsHarshest26.721.3225

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Cason Wallace; left out here: Post-game threads (137), Daily chat thread (67), Lowlights (20), Injury posts (9), Discussion posts (5). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Cason Wallace ran between 12% and 31%. His worst week was the week of Apr 13, 39% negative of 49 comments; his best the week of Apr 6, 53% positive. 14 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 24 comments, under the floor
- L @ DAL 89–106
- W vs CHA 122–116
- L @ IND 101–116
Oct 13 · 19 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIL 116–112
- W vs DEN 94–91
Oct 20 · 19% negative · 52% positive · 77 comments
- W vs HOU 125–124
- W @ ATL 117–100
Oct 27 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W @ DAL 101–94
- W vs SAC 107–101
- W vs WAS 127–108
- W vs NOP 137–106
Nov 3 · 19% negative · 28% positive · 32 comments
- W @ LAC 126–107
- L @ POR 119–121
- W @ SAC 132–101
- W @ MEM 114–100
Nov 10 · 15% negative · 42% positive · 48 comments
- W vs GSW 126–102
- W vs LAL 121–92
- W @ CHA 109–96
Nov 17 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W @ NOP 126–109
- W vs SAC 113–99
- W @ UTA 144–112
- W vs POR 122–95
Nov 24 · 19% negative · 35% positive · 31 comments
- W vs MIN 113–105
- W vs PHX 123–119
- W @ POR 123–115
Dec 1 · 20% negative · 30% positive · 30 comments
- W @ GSW 124–112
- W vs DAL 132–111
- W @ UTA 131–101
Dec 8 · 18% negative · 45% positive · 67 comments
- W vs PHX 138–89
- L vs SAS 109–111
Dec 15 · 20% negative · 30% positive · 70 comments
- W vs LAC 122–101
- L @ MIN 107–112
Dec 22 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 119–103
- L @ SAS 110–130
- L vs SAS 102–117
- W vs PHI 129–104
Dec 29 · 37% negative · 15% positive · 54 comments
- W vs ATL 140–129
- W vs POR 124–95
- W @ GSW 131–94
- L @ PHX 105–108
Jan 5 · 26 comments, under the floor
- L vs CHA 97–124
- W vs UTA 129–125
- W vs MIA 124–112
Jan 12 · 20% negative · 34% positive · 35 comments
- W vs SAS 119–98
- W @ HOU 111–91
- L @ MIA 120–122
Jan 19 · 27 comments, under the floor
- W @ CLE 136–104
- W @ MIL 122–102
- L vs IND 114–117
- L vs TOR 101–103
Jan 26 · 20 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIN 111–123
- W @ DEN 121–111
Feb 2 · 16% negative · 40% positive · 156 comments
- W vs ORL 128–92
- L @ SAS 106–116
- L vs HOU 106–112
Feb 9 · 26 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAL 119–110
- W @ PHX 136–109
- L vs MIL 93–110
Feb 16 · 27 comments, under the floor
- W vs BKN 105–86
- W vs CLE 121–113
Feb 23 · 14% negative · 48% positive · 102 comments
- W @ TOR 116–107
- L @ DET 116–124
- W vs DEN 127–121
- W @ DAL 100–87
Mar 2 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W @ CHI 116–108
- W @ NYK 103–100
- W vs GSW 104–97
Mar 9 · 30% negative · 23% positive · 47 comments
- W vs DEN 129–126
- W vs BOS 104–102
- W vs MIN 116–103
Mar 16 · 23% negative · 19% positive · 75 comments
- W @ ORL 113–108
- W @ BKN 121–92
- W @ WAS 132–111
Mar 23 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W @ PHI 123–103
- L @ BOS 109–119
- W vs CHI 131–113
- W vs NYK 111–100
Mar 30 · 27% negative · 38% positive · 77 comments
- W vs DET 114–110
- W vs LAL 139–96
- W vs UTA 146–111
Apr 6 · 23% negative · 53% positive · 30 comments
- W @ LAL 123–87
- W @ LAC 128–110
Apr 13 · 39% negative · 24% positive · 49 comments
- W vs PHX 119–84
Apr 20 · 22% negative · 25% positive · 36 comments
- W vs PHX 120–107
- W @ PHX 121–109
Apr 27 · 16% negative · 45% positive · 38 comments
- W @ PHX 131–122
May 4 · 31% negative · 32% positive · 137 comments
- W vs LAL 108–90
- W vs LAL 125–107
- W @ LAL 131–108
May 11 · 19% negative · 19% positive · 31 comments
- W @ LAL 115–110
May 18 · 29% negative · 33% positive · 242 comments
- L vs SAS 115–122
- W vs SAS 122–113
- W @ SAS 123–108
- L @ SAS 82–103
May 25 · 20% negative · 46% positive · 495 comments
- W vs SAS 127–114
- L @ SAS 91–118
- L vs SAS 103–111

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Cason Wallace in 11 of his 97 games, at least 20 comments each. It was warmer after losses: net sentiment +31 in losses (18% negative, 49% positive) against +22 in wins (23% negative, 45% positive), on a season net sentiment of +15.

+22In wins23% neg · 45% pos · 338 comments

+31In losses18% neg · 49% pos · 287 comments

+15His season22% neg · 36% pos · 2,456 comments

Games the room talked about Cason Wallace in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 30R3 G7	R3 G7	vs SASL 103–111	L 103–111	36	17	7	4	6-10	5-9	2	-3	17/7/4	51,944	15 points warmer than his season, from 157 comments.
May 28R3 G6	R3 G6	@ SASL 91–118	L 91–118	20	11	3	1	4-6	3-4	2	-14	11/3/1	21,522	22 points warmer than his season, from 71 comments.
May 26R3 G5	R3 G5	vs SASW 127–114	W 127–114	31	7	4	5	2-5	1-3	0	+29	7/4/5	25,748	6 points warmer than his season, from 29 comments.
May 22R3 G3	R3 G3	@ SASW 123–108	W 123–108	28	11	5	4	3-8	2-6	0	+8	11/5/4	31,843	45 points harsher than his season, from 39 comments.
May 20R3 G2	R3 G2	vs SASW 122–113	W 122–113	25	12	4	4	4-6	4-6	0	-3	12/4/4	35,453	2 points warmer than his season, from 48 comments.
May 18R3 G1	R3 G1	vs SASL 115–122	L 115–122	28	8	6	0	3-6	2-5	1	-9	8/6/0	53,003	11 points warmer than his season, from 59 comments.
May 9R2 G3	R2 G3	@ LALW 131–108	W 131–108	25	16	1	1	6-10	4-6	1	+13	16/1/1	13,634	15 points warmer than his season, from 30 comments.
May 7R2 G2	R2 G2	vs LALW 125–107	W 125–107	31	12	2	4	4-7	2-3	0	+17	12/2/4	21,807	39 points harsher than his season, from 25 comments.
Feb 24		@ TORW 116–107	W 116–107	35	27	8	7	11-16	4-5	2	+5	27/8/7	618	38 points warmer than his season, from 38 comments.
Feb 1		@ DENW 121–111	W 121–111	30	27	6	0	9-14	7-11	0	+14	27/6/0	3,131	20 points warmer than his season, from 81 comments.