Tim Hardaway Jr. · Court Sentiment

Verdict

32.9%40.6%26.5%

32.9%Negative360 comments

40.6%Neutral444 comments

26.5%Positive290 comments

−6Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=1,094 comments about Tim Hardaway Jr.Unofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Tim Hardaway Jr., verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Hardaway is actually throwing this game, holy hell has his performance in OT been shit.
Post · [Highlight] Alex Caruso comes up with a huge steal and navigates to the other end to score▲ 12Feb 28, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
Fuck Tim Hardaway Jr
Game thread · MIN 113 @ DEN 125 · R1 G5 · Apr 27▲ 9Apr 28, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.SAS flair
hardaway sucks bruh lol wtf he lost yall the game
Game thread · DEN 121 @ OKC 127 · Feb 27▲ 8Feb 28, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Tim Hardaway Jr. that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Tim Hardaway Jr., his own Nuggets fans are 20% negative, rival fans 38%, unflaired commenters 35%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

20.0%Own fansDEN flair · 240 comments

38.3%Rival fansevery other flair · 415 comments

34.9%Unflairedno flair · 439 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Tim Hardaway Jr. are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Tim Hardaway Jr. was talked about most in the game threads: 486 of his 1,094 comments, −9 net sentiment against −6 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads; his warmest the front page, +5 on 27% of his comments. The game threads ran 14 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads44% of his commentsHarshest38.729.4486

Front page27% of his commentsWarmest24.930.0297

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Tim Hardaway Jr.; left out here: Highlights (142), News (80), Post-game threads (69), Daily chat thread (6), Injury posts (6), Lowlights (6), Discussion posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Tim Hardaway Jr. ran between 13% and 55%. His worst week was the week of Feb 23, 60% negative of 103 comments; his best the week of Jan 12, 57% positive. 28 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIN 116–126
Oct 6 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W @ TOR 112–108
- W @ LAC 102–94
Oct 13 · 13 comments, under the floor
- W vs CHI 124–117
- L @ OKC 91–94
Oct 20 · 20 comments, under the floor
- L @ GSW 131–137
- W vs PHX 133–111
Oct 27 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIN 127–114
- W vs NOP 122–88
- L @ POR 107–109
Nov 3 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W vs SAC 130–124
- W vs MIA 122–112
- W vs GSW 129–104
- W vs IND 117–100
Nov 10 · 23% negative · 49% positive · 35 comments
- W @ SAC 122–108
- W @ LAC 130–116
- W @ MIN 123–112
Nov 17 · 29 comments, under the floor
- L vs CHI 127–130
- W @ NOP 125–118
- W @ HOU 112–109
- L vs SAC 123–128
Nov 24 · 18 comments, under the floor
- W @ MEM 125–115
- L vs SAS 136–139
- W @ PHX 130–112
Dec 1 · 14 comments, under the floor
- L vs DAL 121–131
- W @ IND 135–120
- W @ ATL 134–133
- W @ CHA 115–106
Dec 8 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W @ SAC 136–105
Dec 15 · 38% negative · 6% positive · 82 comments
- W vs HOU 128–125
- W vs ORL 126–115
- L vs HOU 101–115
Dec 22 · 38% negative · 29% positive · 34 comments
- W vs UTA 135–112
- L @ DAL 130–131
- W vs MIN 142–138
- L @ ORL 126–127
Dec 29 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIA 123–147
- W @ TOR 106–103
- L @ CLE 108–113
- L @ BKN 115–127
Jan 5 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W @ BOS 114–110
- L vs ATL 87–110
- W vs MIL 108–104
Jan 12 · 14% negative · 57% positive · 35 comments
- W @ NOP 122–116
- W @ DAL 118–109
- W vs WAS 121–115
- L vs CHA 87–110
Jan 19 · 44% negative · 25% positive · 32 comments
- L vs LAL 107–115
- W @ WAS 107–97
- W @ MIL 102–100
Jan 26 · 16% negative · 23% positive · 75 comments
- L vs DET 107–109
- W vs BKN 107–103
- W vs LAC 122–109
- L vs OKC 111–121
Feb 2 · 46% negative · 17% positive · 41 comments
- L @ DET 121–124
- L @ NYK 127–134
- W @ CHI 136–120
Feb 9 · 22 comments, under the floor
- L vs CLE 117–119
- W vs MEM 122–116
Feb 16 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L @ LAC 114–115
- W @ POR 157–103
- L @ GSW 117–128
Feb 23 · 60% negative · 14% positive · 103 comments
- W vs BOS 103–84
- L @ OKC 121–127
- L vs MIN 108–117
Mar 2 · 17 comments, under the floor
- W @ UTA 128–125
- W vs LAL 120–113
- L vs NYK 103–142
Mar 9 · 30% negative · 43% positive · 44 comments
- L @ OKC 126–129
- W vs HOU 129–93
- W @ SAS 136–131
- L @ LAL 125–127
Mar 16 · 12 comments, under the floor
- W vs PHI 124–96
- L @ MEM 118–125
- W vs TOR 121–115
- W vs POR 128–112
Mar 23 · 13 comments, under the floor
- W @ PHX 125–123
- W vs DAL 142–135
- W vs UTA 135–129
- W vs GSW 116–93
Mar 30 · 19% negative · 39% positive · 36 comments
- W @ UTA 130–117
- W vs SAS 136–134
Apr 6 · 16 comments, under the floor
- W vs POR 137–132
- W vs MEM 136–119
- W vs OKC 127–107
Apr 13 · 17 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIN 116–105
Apr 20 · 39% negative · 31% positive · 119 comments
- L vs MIN 114–119
- L @ MIN 96–113
- L @ MIN 96–112
Apr 27 · 43% negative · 14% positive · 63 comments
- W vs MIN 125–113
- L @ MIN 98–110

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Tim Hardaway Jr. in 5 of his 91 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −28 in losses (51% negative, 23% positive) against −18 in wins (36% negative, 18% positive), on a season net sentiment of −6.

−18In wins36% neg · 18% pos · 56 comments

−28In losses51% neg · 23% pos · 149 comments

−6His season33% neg · 27% pos · 1,094 comments

Games the room talked about Tim Hardaway Jr. in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 27R1 G5	R1 G5	vs MINW 125–113	W 125–113	12	8	0	0	3-5	1-3	0	-1	8/0/0	7,427	34 points harsher than his season, from 30 comments.
Apr 25R1 G4	R1 G4	@ MINL 96–112	L 96–112	28	10	5	2	3-10	0-6	0	+1	10/5/2	13,778	54 points harsher than his season, from 23 comments.
Apr 20R1 G2	R1 G2	vs MINL 114–119	L 114–119	27	16	3	0	4-9	3-3	0	+4	16/3/0	12,235	32 points warmer than his season, from 51 comments.
Feb 27		@ OKCL 121–127	L 121–127	33	16	2	1	6-12	4-7	1	-13	16/2/1	7,202	48 points harsher than his season, from 75 comments.
Jan 30		vs LACW 122–109	W 122–109	25	22	2	0	6-9	5-7	0	+10	22/2/0	698	14 points warmer than his season, from 26 comments.