Nikola Vucevic · Court Sentiment

Verdict

43.6%39.1%17.3%

43.6%Negative508 comments

39.1%Neutral455 comments

17.3%Positive201 comments

−26Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=1,164 comments about Nikola VucevicUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Nikola Vucevic, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.BOS flair
Queta always gets into foul trouble and Vucevic can’t guard a fucking traffic cone. Our center situation is fucked.
Post-game thread · BOS 93 @ PHI 106 · R1 G6 · Apr 30▲ 130May 1, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.BOS flair
I need Vucevic to stop playing ball period
Post-game thread · BOS 108 @ PHI 100 · R1 G3 · Apr 24▲ 119Apr 25, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
Vucevic is a pylon the likes of which are rarely seen
Post-game thread · PHI 113 @ BOS 97 · R1 G5 · Apr 28▲ 41Apr 29, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Nikola Vucevic that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Nikola Vucevic, his own Celtics fans are 49% negative, rival fans 41%, unflaired commenters 44%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

49.4%Own fansBOS flair · 267 comments

40.7%Rival fansevery other flair · 553 comments

43.9%Unflairedno flair · 344 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Nikola Vucevic are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Nikola Vucevic was talked about most on the front page: 352 of his 1,164 comments, −24 net sentiment against −26 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads, −45 on 27% of his comments; his warmest the front page. The game threads ran 21 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads27% of his commentsHarshest59.214.1311

Front page30% of his commentsWarmest39.815.6352

News19% of his comments36.111.9219

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Nikola Vucevic; left out here: Post-game threads (155), Highlights (122), Daily chat thread (2), Discussion posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Nikola Vucevic ran between 23% and 63%. His worst week was the week of Apr 27, 67% negative of 163 comments; his best the week of Nov 3, 46% positive. 28 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 1 comments, under the floor
- W @ CLE 118–117
- L vs MIL 121–127
Oct 13 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L @ DEN 117–124
- W vs MIN 126–120
Oct 20 · 6 comments, under the floor
- W vs DET 115–111
- W @ ORL 110–98
Oct 27 · 23% negative · 42% positive · 43 comments
- W vs ATL 128–123
- W vs SAC 126–113
- W vs NYK 135–125
- L @ NYK 116–128
Nov 3 · 23% negative · 46% positive · 35 comments
- W vs PHI 113–111
- L @ MIL 110–126
- L @ CLE 122–128
Nov 10 · 52% negative · 19% positive · 31 comments
- L vs SAS 117–121
- L @ DET 113–124
- L @ UTA 147–150
Nov 17 · 31% negative · 24% positive · 78 comments
- W @ DEN 130–127
- W @ POR 122–121
- L vs MIA 107–143
- W vs WAS 121–120
Nov 24 · 17 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHA 116–123
- L @ IND 101–103
Dec 1 · 53% negative · 0% positive · 30 comments
- L @ ORL 120–125
- L vs BKN 103–113
- L vs IND 105–120
- L vs GSW 91–123
Dec 8 · 19 comments, under the floor
- W @ CHA 129–126
- L vs NOP 104–114
Dec 15 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W vs CLE 127–111
- W @ CLE 136–125
- W @ ATL 152–150
Dec 22 · 42% negative · 16% positive · 38 comments
- W @ ATL 126–123
- W vs PHI 109–102
- L vs MIL 103–112
Dec 29 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIN 101–136
- W vs NOP 134–118
- W vs ORL 121–114
- L vs CHA 99–112
Jan 5 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ BOS 101–115
- L @ DET 93–108
- W vs DAL 125–107
Jan 12 · 12 comments, under the floor
- L @ HOU 113–119
- W vs UTA 128–126
- L @ BKN 109–112
- W vs BKN 124–102
Jan 19 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W vs LAC 138–110
- W @ MIN 120–115
- W vs BOS 114–111
Jan 26 · 12 comments, under the floor
- L vs LAL 118–129
- L @ IND 110–113
- L vs MIA 113–116
- L @ MIA 91–134
Feb 2 · 32% negative · 20% positive · 190 comments
- W vs MIA 98–96
- L vs NYK 89–111
Feb 9 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W vs CHI 124–105
Feb 16 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W @ GSW 121–110
- W @ LAL 111–89
Feb 23 · 24 comments, under the floor
- W @ PHX 97–81
- L @ DEN 84–103
- W vs BKN 148–111
- W vs PHI 114–98
Mar 2 · 30% negative · 19% positive · 43 comments
- W @ MIL 108–81
- L vs CHA 89–118
- W vs DAL 120–100
Mar 30 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W vs TOR 115–101
Apr 6 · 55% negative · 12% positive · 51 comments
- W vs CHA 113–102
- L @ NYK 106–112
- W vs NOP 144–118
Apr 13 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W vs PHI 123–91
Apr 20 · 59% negative · 20% positive · 123 comments
- L vs PHI 97–111
- W @ PHI 108–100
- W @ PHI 128–96
Apr 27 · 67% negative · 8% positive · 163 comments
- L vs PHI 97–113
- L @ PHI 93–106

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Nikola Vucevic in 5 of his 74 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −52 in losses (69% negative, 17% positive) against −40 in wins (58% negative, 18% positive), on a season net sentiment of −26.

−40In wins58% neg · 18% pos · 72 comments

−52In losses69% neg · 17% pos · 81 comments

−26His season44% neg · 17% pos · 1,164 comments

Games the room talked about Nikola Vucevic in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 30R1 G6	R1 G6	@ PHIL 93–106	L 93–106	14	2	2	1	1-5	0-2	0	-5	2/2/1	5,666	47 points harsher than his season, from 26 comments.
Apr 28R1 G5	R1 G5	vs PHIL 97–113	L 97–113	15	8	2	3	3-6	2-5	1	-10	8/2/3	3,329	24 points harsher than his season, from 22 comments.
Apr 24R1 G3	R1 G3	@ PHIW 108–100	W 108–100	31	11	6	4	4-10	3-9	4	+7	11/6/4	5,048	21 points harsher than his season, from 51 comments.
Apr 21R1 G2	R1 G2	vs PHIL 97–111	L 97–111	18	9	5	1	3-7	1-4	0	-7	9/5/1	3,868	10 points harsher than his season, from 33 comments.
Nov 17		@ DENW 130–127	W 130–127	29	8	9	6	3-13	2-8	1	-12	8/9/6	1,130	3 points warmer than his season, from 21 comments.