Kon Knueppel · Court Sentiment

Verdict

20.3%40.3%39.5%

20.3%Negative1,367 comments

40.3%Neutral2,719 comments

39.5%Positive2,663 comments

+19Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=6,749 comments about Kon Knueppel

Receipts

What the room said about Kon Knueppel, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.IND flair
Kon going 5/22 (1/12 from 3) and -46 across the 2 Play-In games is a brutal introduction to post-season basketball
Post-game thread · CHA 90 @ ORL 121 · Apr 17▲ 13Apr 18, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
Kon Knueppel turned into an absolute bum in these play in games.
Post · Daily Discussion Thread + Game Thread Index | Play-in Tournament▲ 11Apr 18, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.DAL flair
Kon passing up wide open 3s now bros mental is cooked
Game thread · CHA 90 @ ORL 121 · Apr 17▲ 11Apr 18, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Kon Knueppel that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Kon Knueppel, his own Hornets fans are 15% negative, rival fans 21%, unflaired commenters 22%. Among the 6 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Mavericks fans are hardest on him at 36% negative and Raptors fans kindest at 48% positive.

15.0%Own fansCHA flair · 1,229 comments

21.4%Rival fansevery other flair · 3,154 comments

21.5%Unflairedno flair · 2,366 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Kon Knueppel are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Kon Knueppel was talked about most on the front page: 3,460 of his 6,749 comments, +25 net sentiment against +19 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads, 0 on 14% of his comments; his warmest the post-game threads, +33 on 7% of his comments. The game threads ran 25 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads14% of his commentsHarshest32.532.4927

Post-game threads7% of his commentsWarmest17.951.4496

Front page51% of his comments16.641.53,460

Highlights9% of his comments16.042.1632

News16% of his comments21.135.01,049

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Kon Knueppel; left out here: Daily chat thread (131), Lowlights (22), Discussion posts (21), Injury posts (5). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Kon Knueppel ran between 9% and 43%. His worst week was the week of Apr 13, 48% negative of 1,008 comments; his best the week of Nov 10, 60% positive. 9 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 5 comments, under the floor
- L vs OKC 114–135
Oct 6 · 20 comments, under the floor
- L @ OKC 116–122
- W @ DAL 120–116
Oct 13 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 145–116
- L @ NYK 108–113
Oct 20 · 20% negative · 37% positive · 35 comments
- W vs BKN 136–117
- L @ PHI 121–125
- W @ WAS 139–113
Oct 27 · 9% negative · 55% positive · 44 comments
- L @ MIA 117–144
- L vs ORL 107–123
- L vs MIN 105–122
- W vs UTA 126–103
Nov 3 · 11% negative · 41% positive · 44 comments
- L @ NOP 112–116
- L @ MIA 108–126
Nov 10 · 6% negative · 60% positive · 139 comments
- L vs LAL 111–121
- W vs MIL 111–100
- L @ MIL 134–147
- L vs OKC 96–109
Nov 17 · 15% negative · 44% positive · 248 comments
- L @ TOR 108–110
- L @ IND 118–127
- L vs LAC 116–131
- L @ ATL 110–113
Nov 24 · 16% negative · 46% positive · 135 comments
- L vs NYK 101–129
- W vs CHI 123–116
- W vs TOR 118–111
Dec 1 · 11% negative · 30% positive · 57 comments
- L @ BKN 103–116
- L @ NYK 104–119
- W @ TOR 111–86
- L vs DEN 106–115
Dec 8 · 12% negative · 40% positive · 94 comments
- L vs CHI 126–129
- W @ CLE 119–111
Dec 15 · 14% negative · 49% positive · 95 comments
- W vs ATL 133–126
- L @ DET 86–112
Dec 22 · 10% negative · 47% positive · 126 comments
- L @ CLE 132–139
- W vs WAS 126–109
- W @ ORL 120–105
Dec 29 · 13% negative · 46% positive · 115 comments
- L vs GSW 125–132
- L @ MIL 121–122
- W @ CHI 112–99
Jan 5 · 10% negative · 53% positive · 167 comments
- W @ OKC 124–97
- L vs TOR 96–97
- L vs IND 112–114
- W @ UTA 150–95
Jan 12 · 26% negative · 43% positive · 65 comments
- L @ LAC 109–117
- W @ LAL 135–117
- L @ GSW 116–136
- W @ DEN 110–87
Jan 19 · 8% negative · 60% positive · 146 comments
- L vs CLE 87–94
- W @ ORL 124–97
- W vs WAS 119–115
Jan 26 · 10% negative · 50% positive · 343 comments
- W vs PHI 130–93
- W @ MEM 112–97
- W @ DAL 123–121
- W vs SAS 111–106
Feb 2 · 7% negative · 49% positive · 192 comments
- W vs NOP 102–95
- W @ HOU 109–99
- W @ ATL 126–119
Feb 9 · 14% negative · 47% positive · 365 comments
- L vs DET 104–110
- W vs ATL 110–107
Feb 16 · 13% negative · 54% positive · 236 comments
- L vs HOU 101–105
- L vs CLE 113–118
- W @ WAS 129–112
Feb 23 · 8% negative · 56% positive · 453 comments
- W @ CHI 131–99
- W @ IND 133–109
- W vs POR 109–93
Mar 2 · 9% negative · 49% positive · 180 comments
- W vs DAL 117–90
- W @ BOS 118–89
- L vs MIA 120–128
- L @ PHX 99–111
Mar 9 · 7% negative · 45% positive · 175 comments
- W @ POR 103–101
- W @ SAC 117–109
- L @ SAS 102–115
Mar 16 · 13% negative · 44% positive · 114 comments
- W vs MIA 136–106
- W vs ORL 130–111
- W vs MEM 124–101
Mar 23 · 9% negative · 55% positive · 368 comments
- W vs SAC 134–90
- W vs NYK 114–103
- L vs PHI 114–118
- L vs BOS 99–114
Mar 30 · 22% negative · 39% positive · 276 comments
- W @ BKN 117–86
- W vs PHX 127–107
- W vs IND 129–108
- W @ MIN 122–108
Apr 6 · 25% negative · 34% positive · 519 comments
- L @ BOS 102–113
- L vs DET 100–118
- W @ NYK 110–96
Apr 13 · 48% negative · 15% positive · 1,008 comments
- W vs MIA 127–126
- L @ ORL 90–121

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Kon Knueppel in 12 of his 88 games, at least 20 comments each. It was warmer after losses: net sentiment 0 in losses (37% negative, 37% positive) against −1 in wins (32% negative, 32% positive), on a season net sentiment of +19.

−1In wins32% neg · 32% pos · 514 comments

0In losses37% neg · 37% pos · 266 comments

+19His season20% neg · 39% pos · 6,749 comments

Games the room talked about Kon Knueppel in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 17Play-in	Play-in	@ ORLL 90–121	L 90–121	29	11	3	1	3-10	1-6	0	-26	11/3/1	569	66 points harsher than his season, from 148 comments.
Apr 14Play-in	Play-in	vs MIAW 127–126	W 127–126	34	6	5	1	2-12	0-6	0	-20	6/5/1	10,190	62 points harsher than his season, from 296 comments.
Mar 26		vs NYKW 114–103	W 114–103	37	26	11	8	9-14	6-10	2	+15	26/11/8	899	46 points warmer than his season, from 51 comments.
Feb 20		vs CLEL 113–118	L 113–118	37	33	6	2	11-20	7-15	0	+2	33/6/2	315	23 points warmer than his season, from 26 comments.
Feb 9		vs DETL 104–110	L 104–110	34	20	5	3	6-13	5-11	0	-9	20/5/3	2,212	51 points warmer than his season, from 71 comments.
Feb 7		@ ATLW 126–119	W 126–119	36	23	8	4	8-15	6-11	2	+12	23/8/4	422	36 points warmer than his season, from 20 comments.
Feb 5		@ HOUW 109–99	W 109–99	32	24	4	2	8-13	2-5	6	+3	24/4/2	578	58 points warmer than his season, from 22 comments.
Jan 31		vs SASW 111–106	W 111–106	35	13	6	4	5-11	1-4	2	+1	13/6/4	1,429	27 points warmer than his season, from 28 comments.
Jan 29		@ DALW 123–121	W 123–121	36	34	4	3	10-16	8-12	0	+7	34/4/3	612	55 points warmer than his season, from 27 comments.
Jan 15		@ LALW 135–117	W 135–117	33	19	7	4	7-10	3-5	0	+2	19/7/4	954	8 points warmer than his season, from 22 comments.