Klay Thompson · Court Sentiment

Verdict

37.7%35.1%27.3%

37.7%Negative2,508 comments

35.1%Neutral2,335 comments

27.3%Positive1,817 comments

−10Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=6,660 comments about Klay Thompson

Receipts

What the room said about Klay Thompson, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
The Rockets put up one of the most embarrassing finishes of all time last night and this doesn’t even make me feel better. Klay you are a fucking idiot
Post · Megan Thee Stallion calls out Klay Thompson: “Cheating, had me around your whole family playing house... got ‘cold feet’ Holding you down through all your HORRIBLE mood swings and treatment towards me during your basketball season”▲ 3,866Apr 25, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.GSW flair
Sad to watch Klay like this man. Bro is beyond cooked.
Post · Klay Thompson despite the loss: 0 points on 0/6 shooting▲ 339Nov 8, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
What a fucking big ass L for Klay. You’re already washed now you lost The Stallion of Megan?
Post · Megan Thee Stallion calls out Klay Thompson: “Cheating, had me around your whole family playing house... got ‘cold feet’ Holding you down through all your HORRIBLE mood swings and treatment towards me during your basketball season”▲ 302Apr 25, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Klay Thompson that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Klay Thompson, his own Mavericks fans are 32% negative, rival fans 37%, unflaired commenters 39%. Among the 3 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Lakers fans are hardest on him at 37% negative and Warriors fans kindest at 30% positive.

31.5%Own fansDAL flair · 219 comments

36.7%Rival fansevery other flair · 3,439 comments

39.2%Unflairedno flair · 3,002 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Klay Thompson are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Klay Thompson was talked about most on the front page: 3,843 of his 6,660 comments, −10 net sentiment against −10 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads, −32 on 7% of his comments; his warmest highlights, +6 on 16% of his comments. The game threads ran 21 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads7% of his commentsHarshest54.823.2487

Post-game threads3% of his comments43.830.8224

Front page58% of his comments36.626.43,843

Highlights16% of his commentsWarmest32.538.61,068

News14% of his comments36.819.6903

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Klay Thompson; left out here: Lowlights (82), Daily chat thread (17), Injury posts (13), Discussion posts (4). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Klay Thompson ran between 19% and 51%. His worst week was the week of Oct 20, 61% negative of 165 comments; his best the week of Feb 23, 45% positive.

Oct 6 · 29% negative · 27% positive · 55 comments
- W vs OKC 106–89
- L vs CHA 116–120
Oct 13 · 22% negative · 41% positive · 46 comments
- W @ UTA 114–101
- W @ LAL 121–94
Oct 20 · 61% negative · 13% positive · 165 comments
- L vs SAS 92–125
- L vs WAS 107–117
- W vs TOR 139–129
Oct 27 · 39% negative · 22% positive · 83 comments
- L vs OKC 94–101
- W vs IND 107–105
- L vs DET 110–122
Nov 3 · 53% negative · 12% positive · 385 comments
- L @ HOU 102–110
- L vs NOP 99–101
- L @ MEM 104–118
Nov 10 · 45% negative · 22% positive · 443 comments
- L vs MIL 114–116
- L vs PHX 114–123
- L vs LAC 127–133
- W vs POR 138–133
Nov 17 · 37% negative · 38% positive · 998 comments
- L @ MIN 96–120
- L vs NYK 111–113
- W vs NOP 118–115
- L vs MEM 96–102
Nov 24 · 39% negative · 27% positive · 307 comments
- L @ MIA 102–106
- L @ LAL 119–129
- W @ LAC 114–110
Dec 1 · 28% negative · 38% positive · 192 comments
- W @ DEN 131–121
- W vs MIA 118–108
- L @ OKC 111–132
Dec 8 · 25% negative · 27% positive · 216 comments
- W vs BKN 119–111
Dec 15 · 40% negative · 25% positive · 195 comments
- L @ UTA 133–140
- W vs DET 116–114
- L @ PHI 114–121
Dec 22 · 25% negative · 41% positive · 155 comments
- L @ NOP 113–119
- L @ GSW 116–126
- L @ SAC 107–113
Dec 29 · 25% negative · 25% positive · 126 comments
- L @ POR 122–125
- L vs PHI 108–123
- W vs HOU 110–104
Jan 5 · 46% negative · 15% positive · 80 comments
- W @ SAC 100–98
- L @ UTA 114–116
- L @ CHI 107–125
Jan 12 · 35% negative · 28% positive · 96 comments
- W vs BKN 113–105
- L vs DEN 109–118
- W vs UTA 144–122
- W vs UTA 138–120
Jan 19 · 45% negative · 21% positive · 82 comments
- W @ NYK 114–97
- W vs GSW 123–115
- L vs LAL 110–116
Jan 26 · 28% negative · 35% positive · 85 comments
- L vs CHA 121–123
- L @ HOU 107–111
Feb 2 · 31% negative · 22% positive · 139 comments
- L vs BOS 100–110
- L vs SAS 123–135
- L @ SAS 125–138
Feb 9 · 20% negative · 33% positive · 105 comments
- L @ LAL 104–124
Feb 16 · 30% negative · 41% positive · 54 comments
- L @ MIN 111–122
- W @ IND 134–130
Feb 23 · 14% negative · 45% positive · 111 comments
- W @ BKN 123–114
- L vs SAC 121–130
- L vs OKC 87–100
Mar 2 · 17% negative · 42% positive · 78 comments
- L @ ORL 114–115
- L @ BOS 100–120
- L @ TOR 92–122
Mar 9 · 26% negative · 40% positive · 189 comments
- L @ ATL 112–124
- L vs CLE 105–138
Mar 16 · 31% negative · 25% positive · 52 comments
- L vs ATL 120–135
- L vs LAC 131–138
Mar 23 · 19% negative · 41% positive · 113 comments
- L vs GSW 131–137
- L @ DEN 135–142
- W @ POR 100–93
Mar 30 · 34% negative · 32% positive · 38 comments
- L vs MIN 94–124
- L vs ORL 127–138
- W vs LAL 134–128
Apr 6 · 30% negative · 22% positive · 81 comments
- L @ LAC 103–116
- W vs CHI 149–128

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Klay Thompson in 5 of his 73 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −64 in losses (76% negative, 12% positive) against +33 in wins (25% negative, 58% positive), on a season net sentiment of −10.

+33In wins25% neg · 58% pos · 36 comments

−64In losses76% neg · 12% pos · 158 comments

−10His season38% neg · 27% pos · 6,660 comments

Games the room talked about Klay Thompson in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Nov 29	@ LACW 114–110	W 114–110	26	23	3	1	8-13	6-10	0	+15	23/3/1	846	44 points warmer than his season, from 36 comments.
Nov 28	@ LALL 119–129	L 119–129	20	10	1	1	3-8	3-6	1	+3	10/1/1	2,180	56 points harsher than his season, from 27 comments.
Nov 22	vs MEML 96–102	L 96–102	28	22	1	0	7-17	6-12	1	+2	22/1/0	142	25 points harsher than his season, from 45 comments.
Nov 19	vs NYKL 111–113	L 111–113	27	13	2	2	5-11	3-9	0	-4	13/2/2	736	55 points harsher than his season, from 26 comments.
Oct 22	vs SASL 92–125	L 92–125	22	10	2	1	4-13	1-5	1	-23	10/2/1	5,266	73 points harsher than his season, from 60 comments.