What the room said about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.
Exhibit 01Negative.MEM flair
If an expansion team picks KCP, they should just fold and start the team over
Exhibit 02Negative.NYK flair
KCP has been totally washed since he left the nuggets anyway
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
KCP fucking sucks lol. Where is he playing?
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope that cleared the classifier's confidence bar
and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.
Fans
Of what r/NBA says about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, his own Grizzlies fans are 32% negative, rival fans 35%, unflaired commenters 44%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.
31.8%Own fansMEM flair · 44 comments
35.2%Rival fansevery other flair · 293 comments
44.4%Unflairedno flair · 171 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope are left out of the lists;
the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Rooms
Only one room holds enough comments about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope to split. On the front page, 264 of his 508 comments, −17 net sentiment against −20 across his season.
% neg% posn
Front page52% of his comments35.618.9264
Method
A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope; left out here: News (96), Post-game threads (50), Game threads (47), Highlights (40), Lowlights (7), Injury posts (3), Daily chat thread (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Timeline
Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope ran between 19% and 63%. 40 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.
PreseasonRegular seasonPlayoffsOff-season
Negative 19%Positive 14%
Sep 29 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
Oct 6 · 7 comments, under the floor
L vs DET 112–128
L vs ATL 116–122
Oct 13 · 12 comments, under the floor
L @ CHA 116–145
W @ MIA 141–125
Oct 20 · 25 comments, under the floor
W vs NOP 128–122
L vs MIA 114–146
W vs IND 128–103
Oct 27 · 18 comments, under the floor
L @ GSW 118–131
W @ PHX 114–113
L vs LAL 112–117
L @ TOR 104–117
Nov 3 · 28 comments, under the floor
L vs DET 106–114
L vs HOU 109–124
W vs DAL 118–104
L vs OKC 100–114
Nov 10 · 23 comments, under the floor
L @ NYK 120–133
L @ BOS 95–131
L @ CLE 100–108
Nov 17 · 17 comments, under the floor
L @ SAS 101–111
W vs SAC 137–96
W @ DAL 102–96
Nov 24 · 23 comments, under the floor
L vs DEN 115–125
W @ NOP 133–128
W @ LAC 112–107
W @ SAC 115–107
Dec 1 · 8 comments, under the floor
L @ SAS 119–126
W vs LAC 107–98
W vs POR 119–96
Dec 8 · 19 comments, under the floor
L vs UTA 126–130
Dec 15 · 7 comments, under the floor
W @ LAC 121–103
W @ MIN 116–110
L vs WAS 122–130
Dec 22 · 8 comments, under the floor
L @ OKC 103–119
W @ UTA 137–128
W vs MIL 125–104
L @ WAS 112–116
Dec 29 · 20 comments, under the floor
L @ LAL 121–128
L @ LAL 114–120
Jan 5 · 10 comments, under the floor
W vs SAS 106–105
L vs PHX 98–117
L vs OKC 116–117
W vs BKN 103–98
Jan 12 · 18 comments, under the floor
L vs ORL 111–118
W vs ORL 126–109
Jan 19 · 7 comments, under the floor
L vs ATL 122–124
L vs NOP 127–133
Jan 26 · 8 comments, under the floor
L @ HOU 99–108
L vs CHA 97–112
L @ NOP 106–114
L vs MIN 114–131
Feb 2 · 22 comments, under the floor
W vs MIN 137–128
W @ SAC 129–125
L @ POR 115–122
Feb 9 · 24 comments, under the floor
L @ GSW 113–114
L @ DEN 116–122
Feb 16 · 12 comments, under the floorNo games
Feb 23 · 8 comments, under the floorNo games
Mar 2 · 5 comments, under the floorNo games
Mar 9 · 5 comments, under the floorNo games
Mar 16 · 4 comments, under the floorNo games
Mar 23 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
Mar 30 · 18 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 6 · 9 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 13 · 20 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 20 · 18 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 27 · 24 comments, under the floorNo games
May 4 · 9 comments, under the floorNo games
May 11 · 9 comments, under the floorNo games
May 18 · 5 comments, under the floorNo games
May 25 · 10 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 1 · 6 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 8 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 15 · 22 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 22 · 6 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 29 · 5 comments, under the floorNo games
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun
· hover or tap a week for its games.
4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.
Games
The room talked about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope in 0 of his 55 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.
—In winstoo few graded wins
—In lossestoo few graded losses
−20His season38% neg · 18% pos · 508 comments
The room never reached 20 comments about Kentavious Caldwell-Pope in one of his games.