2025-26

Jordan Clarkson

NYK · G · #00

Unofficial: 1,461 comments, 3,539 short of the official minimum of 5,000. Among all 223 tracked players he would rank 48th most argued about.

PPG: 8.7
RPG: 1.8
APG: 1.3
GP: 73

Height: 6′5″
Weight: 194 lb
Age: 34
Born: Jun 7, 1992
Experience: 11 yrs
From: Missouri

Verdict

35.8%34.5%29.7%

35.8%Negative523 comments

34.5%Neutral504 comments

29.7%Positive434 comments

−6Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=1,461 comments about Jordan ClarksonUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Jordan Clarkson, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Jordan Clarkson so ass he got benched during a 60 pt blowout
Game thread · NYK 140 @ ATL 89 · R1 G6 · Apr 30▲ 9May 1, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.NYK flair
TAKE CLARKSON OUT FOR FUCKS SAKE
Game thread · SAS 106 @ NYK 107 · R4 G4 · Jun 10▲ 8Jun 11, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.PHI flair
WHAT IS CLARKSON DOING OUT THERE SIT YOUR ASS ON THE BENCH
Game thread · SAS 115 @ NYK 111 · R4 G3 · Jun 8▲ 7Jun 9, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Jordan Clarkson that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Jordan Clarkson, his own Knicks fans are 33% negative, rival fans 36%, unflaired commenters 38%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

32.7%Own fansNYK flair · 379 comments

35.9%Rival fansevery other flair · 613 comments

38.2%Unflairedno flair · 469 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Jordan Clarkson are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Jordan Clarkson was talked about most in the game threads: 853 of his 1,461 comments, −15 net sentiment against −6 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads; his warmest the front page, +6 on 20% of his comments. The game threads ran 22 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads58% of his commentsHarshest43.828.6853

Front page20% of his commentsWarmest24.731.0287

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Jordan Clarkson; left out here: Highlights (108), News (105), Post-game threads (70), Daily chat thread (16), Lowlights (12), Injury posts (5), Discussion posts (3). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Jordan Clarkson ran between 3% and 45%. His worst week was the week of Apr 20, 59% negative of 46 comments; his best the week of Dec 15, 58% positive. 30 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W vs PHI 99–84
- W vs PHI 113–104
Oct 6 · 3 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIN 100–95
Oct 13 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L vs WAS 103–120
- W vs CHA 113–108
Oct 20 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W vs CLE 119–111
- W vs BOS 105–95
- L @ MIA 107–115
Oct 27 · 21 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIL 111–121
- L @ CHI 125–135
- W vs CHI 128–116
Nov 3 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W vs WAS 119–102
- W vs MIN 137–114
- W vs BKN 134–98
Nov 10 · 17 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 133–120
- L vs ORL 107–124
- W vs MIA 140–132
Nov 17 · 8 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIA 113–115
- W @ DAL 113–111
- L @ ORL 121–133
Nov 24 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 113–100
- W @ CHA 129–101
- W vs MIL 118–109
- W vs TOR 116–94
Dec 1 · 21 comments, under the floor
- L @ BOS 117–123
- W vs CHA 119–104
- W vs UTA 146–112
- W vs ORL 106–100
Dec 8 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W @ TOR 117–101
- W vs ORL 132–120
Dec 15 · 14% negative · 58% positive · 110 comments
- W vs SAS 124–113
- W @ IND 114–113
- L vs PHI 107–116
- W vs MIA 132–125
Dec 22 · 16% negative · 46% positive · 37 comments
- L @ MIN 104–115
- W vs CLE 126–124
- W @ ATL 128–125
Dec 29 · 27% negative · 33% positive · 48 comments
- W @ NOP 130–125
- L @ SAS 132–134
- L vs ATL 99–111
- L vs PHI 119–130
Jan 5 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L @ DET 90–121
- W vs LAC 123–111
- L @ PHX 107–112
- W @ POR 123–114
Jan 12 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L @ SAC 101–112
- L @ GSW 113–126
- L vs PHX 99–106
Jan 19 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L vs DAL 97–114
- W vs BKN 120–66
Jan 26 · 8 comments, under the floor
- W @ TOR 119–92
Feb 2 · 35% negative · 8% positive · 37 comments
- W @ WAS 132–101
- W vs DEN 134–127
- L @ DET 80–118
- W @ BOS 111–89
Feb 9 · 17 comments, under the floor
- L vs IND 134–137
- W @ PHI 138–89
Feb 23 · 3 comments, under the floor
- L @ CLE 94–109
- W @ MIL 127–98
Mar 2 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W @ DEN 142–103
- L @ LAL 97–110
Mar 9 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L @ LAC 118–126
- W @ UTA 134–117
- W @ IND 101–92
- W vs GSW 110–107
Mar 16 · 1 comments, under the floor
- W vs IND 136–110
- W @ BKN 93–92
- W vs WAS 145–113
Mar 23 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W vs NOP 121–116
- L @ CHA 103–114
- L @ OKC 100–111
Mar 30 · 14 comments, under the floor
- L @ HOU 94–111
- W @ MEM 130–119
- W vs CHI 136–96
Apr 6 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W @ ATL 108–105
- W vs BOS 112–106
- W vs TOR 112–95
- L vs CHA 96–110
Apr 13 · 24 comments, under the floor
- W vs ATL 113–102
Apr 20 · 59% negative · 11% positive · 46 comments
- L vs ATL 106–107
- L @ ATL 108–109
- W @ ATL 114–98
Apr 27 · 20 comments, under the floor
- W vs ATL 126–97
- W @ ATL 140–89
May 4 · 32% negative · 38% positive · 50 comments
- W vs PHI 137–98
- W vs PHI 108–102
- W @ PHI 108–94
- W @ PHI 144–114
May 18 · 40% negative · 21% positive · 75 comments
- W vs CLE 115–104
- W vs CLE 109–93
- W @ CLE 121–108
May 25 · 16% negative · 51% positive · 37 comments
- W @ CLE 130–93
Jun 1 · 37% negative · 28% positive · 67 comments
- W @ SAS 105–95
Jun 8 · 46% negative · 26% positive · 545 comments
- L vs SAS 111–115
- W vs SAS 107–106
- W @ SAS 94–90

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Jordan Clarkson in 9 of his 96 games, at least 20 comments each. It was warmer after losses: net sentiment −3 in losses (37% negative, 34% positive) against −22 in wins (49% negative, 27% positive), on a season net sentiment of −6.

−22In wins49% neg · 27% pos · 363 comments

−3In losses37% neg · 34% pos · 293 comments

−6His season36% neg · 30% pos · 1,461 comments

Games the room talked about Jordan Clarkson in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Jun 13R4 G5	R4 G5	@ SASW 94–90	W 94–90	6	2	1	0	1-5	0-2	0	+3	2/1/0	56,307	At his season, from 50 comments.
Jun 10R4 G4	R4 G4	vs SASW 107–106	W 107–106	5	2	1	0	1-3	0-1	2	+2	2/1/0	73,619	63 points harsher than his season, from 129 comments.
Jun 8R4 G3	R4 G3	vs SASL 111–115	L 111–115	13	10	3	1	4-7	2-2	2	+8	10/3/1	59,290	2 points warmer than his season, from 269 comments.
Jun 3R4 G1	R4 G1	@ SASW 105–95	W 105–95	6	0	1	0	0-1	0-1	0	+2	0/1/0	45,156	36 points harsher than his season, from 36 comments.
May 19R3 G1	R3 G1	vs CLEW 115–104	W 115–104	16	3	2	0	1-3	1-1	1	+2	3/2/0	19,144	47 points harsher than his season, from 28 comments.
Apr 18R1 G1	R1 G1	vs ATLW 113–102	W 113–102	11	8	2	1	4-6	0-0	0	+9	8/2/1	4,288	6 points warmer than his season, from 20 comments.
Dec 31		@ SASL 132–134	L 132–134	24	20	2	2	8-17	4-6	0	+5	20/2/2	1,892	14 points warmer than his season, from 24 comments.
Dec 25		vs CLEW 126–124	W 126–124	29	25	1	2	9-17	5-10	0	+13	25/1/2	4,301	54 points warmer than his season, from 23 comments.
Dec 16		vs SASW 124–113	W 124–113	27	15	2	0	6-15	3-7	0	+15	15/2/0	8,936	46 points warmer than his season, from 77 comments.