What the room said about Jerami Grant, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.
Exhibit 01Negative.POR flair
Give me Aminu>Grant any fucking day of the week.
Jerami the No. 1 softest dude in the league, by a wide margin. It’s so miserable to watch bro drive the lane and fall over his own feet into the defender that is waiting there to absolutely obliterate that blasphemous version of a shot attempt he just put up there.
Seriously, I really dislike Jerami Grant and have zero respect for him as a player or athlete.
Exhibit 02Negative.MIA flair
Jerami Grant has to be one of the worst:
- 2025-26 — $32 Million
- 2026-27 — $34 Million
- 2027-28 — $36 Million (Player Option)
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
if you say Jerami Grant, I am going to k\*\*\* myself
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Jerami Grant that cleared the classifier's confidence bar
and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.
Fans
Of what r/NBA says about Jerami Grant, his own Blazers fans are 34% negative, rival fans 34%, unflaired commenters 38%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.
33.7%Own fansPOR flair · 101 comments
33.9%Rival fansevery other flair · 171 comments
37.6%Unflairedno flair · 101 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Jerami Grant are left out of the lists;
the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Rooms
Timeline
Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Jerami Grant ran between 18% and 53%. His worst week was the week of Apr 20, 67% negative of 36 comments; his best the week of Jun 29, 16% positive. 38 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.
PreseasonRegular seasonPlayoffsOff-season
Negative 39%Positive 13%
Sep 29 · 1 comments, under the floorNo games
Oct 6 · 5 comments, under the floor
L @ GSW 123–129
W vs SAC 124–123
Oct 13 · 7 comments, under the floor
L vs GSW 111–118
L @ UTA 129–132
Oct 20 · 22 comments, under the floor
L vs MIN 114–118
W vs GSW 139–119
L @ LAC 107–114
Oct 27 · 13 comments, under the floor
W @ LAL 122–108
W @ UTA 136–134
W vs DEN 109–107
Nov 3 · 5 comments, under the floor
L vs LAL 115–123
W vs OKC 121–119
L @ MIA 131–136
Nov 10 · 9 comments, under the floor
L @ ORL 112–115
W @ NOP 125–117
L @ HOU 116–140
L @ DAL 133–138
Nov 17 · 9 comments, under the floor
L vs CHI 121–122
W @ GSW 127–123
L @ OKC 95–122
Nov 24 · 7 comments, under the floor
W @ MIL 115–103
L vs SAS 102–115
L vs OKC 115–123
Dec 1 · 11 comments, under the floor
L @ TOR 118–121
W @ CLE 122–110
L @ DET 116–122
L @ MEM 96–119
Dec 8 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ NOP 120–143
W vs GSW 136–131
Dec 15 · 26 comments, under the floor
W vs SAC 134–133
Dec 22 · 6 comments, under the floorNo games
Dec 29 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
Jan 5 · 6 comments, under the floorNo games
Jan 12 · 3 comments, under the floor
W vs ATL 117–101
W vs LAL 132–116
Jan 19 · 12 comments, under the floor
W vs MIA 127–110
L vs TOR 98–110
Jan 26 · 8 comments, under the floor
L @ BOS 94–102
L @ WAS 111–115
L @ NYK 97–127
L vs CLE 111–130
Feb 2 · 17 comments, under the floor
L vs PHX 125–130
W vs MEM 135–115
W vs MEM 122–115
Feb 9 · 1 comments, under the floor
W vs PHI 135–118
L @ MIN 109–133
W @ UTA 135–119
Feb 16 · 3 comments, under the floor
L vs DEN 103–157
W @ PHX 92–77
Feb 23 · 6 comments, under the floor
L vs MIN 121–124
W @ CHI 121–112
L @ CHA 93–109
L @ ATL 101–135
Mar 2 · 4 comments, under the floor
W @ MEM 122–114
L @ HOU 99–106
W vs IND 131–111
Mar 9 · 4 comments, under the floor
L vs CHA 101–103
W vs UTA 124–114
L @ PHI 103–109
Mar 16 · 6 comments, under the floor
W @ BKN 114–95
W @ IND 127–119
W @ MIN 108–104
Mar 23 · 1 comments, under the floor
W vs MIL 130–99
L vs DAL 93–100
Mar 30 · 4 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 6 · 2 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 13 · 29 comments, under the floor
W @ PHX 114–110
L @ SAS 98–111
Apr 20 · 67% negative · 6% positive · 36 comments
W @ SAS 106–103
L vs SAS 108–120
L vs SAS 93–114
Apr 27 · 7 comments, under the floor
L @ SAS 95–114
May 4 · 7 comments, under the floorNo games
May 11 · 8 comments, under the floorNo games
May 18 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
May 25 · 5 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 1 · 1 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 8 · 4 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 15 · 7 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 22 · 16 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 29 · 49% negative · 16% positive · 43 commentsNo games
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun
worst week best week · hover or tap a week for its games.
4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.
Games
The room talked about Jerami Grant in 0 of his 67 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.
—In winstoo few graded wins
—In lossestoo few graded losses
−13His season35% neg · 22% pos · 373 comments
The room never reached 20 comments about Jerami Grant in one of his games.