2025-26

Immanuel Quickley

TOR · G · #5

Unofficial: 548 comments, 4,452 short of the official minimum of 5,000. Among all 223 tracked players he would rank 98th most hated.

PPG: 16.4
RPG: 4.0
APG: 5.9
GP: 70

Height: 6′2″
Weight: 190 lb
Age: 27
Born: Jun 17, 1999
Experience: 5 yrs
From: Kentucky

Verdict

36.5%42.0%21.5%

36.5%Negative200 comments

42.0%Neutral230 comments

21.5%Positive118 comments

−15Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=548 comments about Immanuel QuickleyUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Immanuel Quickley, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.CHI flair
quickley getting 30+million is such a disaster contract
Post · [Popper] The Knicks have held trade discussions involving Karl-Anthony Towns with multiple teams, including Memphis, Orlando, and Charlotte.▲ 195Jan 20, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.TOR flair
Quickley is a 6 pack of ass.
Post · [Stein] The Atlanta Hawks would be sending the Washington Wizards— or any team that trades for Trae Young— draft capital in return for taking on Young’s contract that has a $49M player option for the 2026-27 season.▲ 14Jan 6, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.TOR flair
I swear Quickley is terrible our fans are coping insanely that he isn't one of the worst if not the worst contract in the league
Post · [Lewenberg] Rajakovic was asked why Quickley wasn’t on the floor to close the game? “Because Jamal Shead was on the floor instead.”▲ 10Dec 30, 2025Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Immanuel Quickley that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Immanuel Quickley, his own Raptors fans are 35% negative, rival fans 39%, unflaired commenters 36%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

35.3%Own fansTOR flair · 201 comments

38.6%Rival fansevery other flair · 184 comments

35.6%Unflairedno flair · 163 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Immanuel Quickley are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Immanuel Quickley ran between 23% and 48%. His worst week was the week of Jan 5, 36% negative of 33 comments; his best the week of Jan 19, 50% positive. 36 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 3 comments, under the floor
- L vs DEN 108–112
- W @ SAC 130–122
- W @ WAS 113–112
Oct 13 · 17 comments, under the floor
- L @ BOS 108–110
- W vs BKN 119–114
Oct 20 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W @ ATL 138–118
- L vs MIL 116–122
- L @ DAL 129–139
Oct 27 · 23 comments, under the floor
- L @ SAS 103–121
- L vs HOU 121–139
- W @ CLE 112–101
- W vs MEM 117–104
Nov 3 · 22 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIL 128–100
- W @ ATL 109–97
- L @ PHI 120–130
Nov 10 · 18 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 119–109
- W @ CLE 126–113
- W @ IND 129–111
Nov 17 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W vs CHA 110–108
- W @ PHI 121–112
- W vs WAS 140–110
- W vs BKN 119–109
Nov 24 · 20 comments, under the floor
- W vs CLE 110–99
- W vs IND 97–95
- L @ CHA 111–118
- L @ NYK 94–116
Dec 1 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W vs POR 121–118
- L vs LAL 120–123
- L vs CHA 86–111
- L vs BOS 113–121
Dec 15 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIA 106–96
- W @ MIL 111–105
- L vs BOS 96–112
- L @ BKN 81–96
Dec 22 · 12 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIA 112–91
- L @ WAS 117–138
- W vs GSW 141–127
Dec 29 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W vs ORL 107–106
- L vs DEN 103–106
- W vs ATL 134–117
Jan 5 · 36% negative · 27% positive · 33 comments
- W vs ATL 118–100
- W @ CHA 97–96
- L @ BOS 117–125
- W vs PHI 116–115
Jan 12 · 26 comments, under the floor
- L vs PHI 102–115
- L @ LAL 93–110
Jan 19 · 29% negative · 50% positive · 38 comments
- W @ GSW 145–127
- W @ SAC 122–109
- W @ POR 110–98
- W @ OKC 103–101
Jan 26 · 25% negative · 28% positive · 32 comments
- L vs NYK 92–119
- L @ ORL 120–130
- W vs UTA 107–100
Feb 2 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIN 126–128
- W vs CHI 123–107
- W vs IND 122–104
Feb 9 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L vs DET 95–113
Feb 16 · no comments
- W @ CHI 110–101
- W @ MIL 122–94
Feb 23 · 2 comments, under the floor
- L vs OKC 107–116
- L vs SAS 107–110
- W @ WAS 134–125
Mar 2 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L vs NYK 95–111
- L @ MIN 107–115
- W vs DAL 122–92
Mar 9 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ HOU 99–113
- L @ NOP 111–122
- W vs PHX 122–115
- W vs DET 119–108
Mar 16 · 1 comments, under the floor
- W @ CHI 139–109
- L @ DEN 115–121
- L @ PHX 98–120
Apr 6 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIA 121–95
- W vs MIA 128–114
- W vs BKN 136–101

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Immanuel Quickley in 0 of his 75 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

—In winstoo few graded wins

—In lossestoo few graded losses

−15His season36% neg · 22% pos · 548 comments

The room never reached 20 comments about Immanuel Quickley in one of his games.