Dyson Daniels · Court Sentiment

Verdict

37.2%38.0%24.9%

37.2%Negative807 comments

38.0%Neutral824 comments

24.9%Positive540 comments

−12Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=2,171 comments about Dyson DanielsUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Dyson Daniels, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.UTA flair
> Dyson Daniels is shooting 10.5% from 3 & 60.6% from the free throw line over his last 15 games. How is this actually possible?
Post · Hawks shooting guard Dyson Daniels is currently shooting 9 percent from three in the month of December.▲ 990Dec 22, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.NYK flair
Daniels a certified bum
Post · [Highlight] Mitch Robinson and Dyson Daniels both ejected after fight▲ 71May 1, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
Dyson Daniels is a scumbag
Post · At the half, the Atlanta Hawks lead O. G Anunoby by 10 points▲ 34May 1, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Dyson Daniels that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Dyson Daniels, his own Hawks fans are 23% negative, rival fans 41%, unflaired commenters 40%. Among the 2 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Knicks fans are hardest on him at 55% negative and Hawks fans kindest at 38% positive.

23.2%Own fansATL flair · 405 comments

40.9%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,077 comments

39.6%Unflairedno flair · 689 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Dyson Daniels are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Dyson Daniels was talked about most on the front page: 748 of his 2,171 comments, −2 net sentiment against −12 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads, −34 on 29% of his comments; his warmest the front page. The game threads ran 32 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads29% of his commentsHarshest54.319.8632

Front page34% of his commentsWarmest27.425.1748

Highlights14% of his comments32.726.1303

News12% of his comments34.419.5256

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Dyson Daniels; left out here: Post-game threads (199), Lowlights (18), Daily chat thread (7), Injury posts (7). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Dyson Daniels ran between 14% and 53%. His worst week was the week of Apr 27, 61% negative of 491 comments; his best the week of Mar 30, 54% positive. 18 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 12 comments, under the floor
- L @ HOU 113–122
- W @ MEM 122–116
Oct 20 · 20% negative · 23% positive · 88 comments
- L vs TOR 118–138
- W @ ORL 111–107
- L vs OKC 100–117
Oct 27 · 28% negative · 25% positive · 36 comments
- L @ CHI 123–128
- W @ BKN 117–112
- W @ IND 128–108
- L @ CLE 109–117
Nov 3 · 14% negative · 51% positive · 37 comments
- W vs ORL 127–112
- L vs TOR 97–109
- W vs LAL 122–102
Nov 10 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAC 105–102
- W @ SAC 133–100
- W @ UTA 132–122
- W @ PHX 124–122
Nov 17 · 28% negative · 33% positive · 60 comments
- L vs DET 112–120
- L @ SAS 126–135
- W @ NOP 115–98
- W vs CHA 113–110
Nov 24 · 30% negative · 24% positive · 37 comments
- L @ WAS 113–132
- W vs CLE 130–123
- W @ PHI 142–134
Dec 1 · 24% negative · 34% positive · 41 comments
- L @ DET 98–99
- L vs LAC 92–115
- L vs DEN 133–134
- W @ WAS 131–116
Dec 8 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L @ DET 115–142
- W vs PHI 120–117
Dec 15 · 26 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHA 126–133
- L vs SAS 98–126
- L vs CHI 150–152
Dec 22 · 49% negative · 11% positive · 45 comments
- L vs MIA 111–126
- L vs NYK 125–128
Dec 29 · 36% negative · 18% positive · 44 comments
- L @ OKC 129–140
- W vs MIN 126–102
- W @ NYK 111–99
- L @ TOR 117–134
Jan 5 · 38% negative · 27% positive · 45 comments
- L @ TOR 100–118
- W vs NOP 117–100
- W @ DEN 110–87
- W @ GSW 124–111
Jan 12 · 44% negative · 20% positive · 41 comments
- L @ LAL 116–141
- L @ POR 101–117
Jan 19 · 19 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIL 110–112
- W @ MEM 124–122
- W vs PHX 110–103
Jan 26 · 27% negative · 41% positive · 37 comments
- W vs IND 132–116
- W @ BOS 117–106
- L vs HOU 86–104
- L @ IND 124–129
Feb 2 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIA 127–115
- W vs UTA 121–119
- L vs CHA 119–126
Feb 9 · 21% negative · 21% positive · 38 comments
- L @ CHA 107–110
Feb 16 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W @ PHI 117–107
- L vs MIA 97–128
- W vs BKN 115–104
Feb 23 · 22 comments, under the floor
- W vs WAS 119–98
- W vs WAS 126–96
- W vs POR 135–101
Mar 2 · 13% negative · 41% positive · 39 comments
- W @ MIL 131–113
- W vs PHI 125–116
Mar 9 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W vs DAL 124–112
- W vs MIL 122–99
Mar 16 · 29 comments, under the floor
- W vs ORL 124–112
- W @ DAL 135–120
- L @ HOU 95–117
- W vs GSW 126–110
Mar 23 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 146–107
- W @ DET 130–129
- L @ BOS 102–109
Mar 30 · 11% negative · 54% positive · 89 comments
- W vs BOS 112–102
- W @ ORL 130–101
- W @ BKN 141–107
Apr 6 · 27% negative · 25% positive · 64 comments
- L vs NYK 105–108
- L @ CLE 116–122
- W vs CLE 124–102
Apr 13 · 36% negative · 22% positive · 94 comments
- L @ NYK 102–113
Apr 20 · 47% negative · 24% positive · 269 comments
- W @ NYK 107–106
- W vs NYK 109–108
- L vs NYK 98–114
Apr 27 · 61% negative · 10% positive · 491 comments
- L @ NYK 97–126
- L vs NYK 89–140

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Dyson Daniels in 6 of his 84 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −52 in losses (64% negative, 12% positive) against −24 in wins (49% negative, 26% positive), on a season net sentiment of −12.

−24In wins49% neg · 26% pos · 148 comments

−52In losses64% neg · 12% pos · 386 comments

−12His season37% neg · 25% pos · 2,171 comments

Games the room talked about Dyson Daniels in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 30R1 G6	R1 G6	vs NYKL 89–140	L 89–140	15	3	0	0	1-4	1-3	2	-36	3/0/0	9,211	46 points harsher than his season, from 275 comments.
Apr 28R1 G5	R1 G5	@ NYKL 97–126	L 97–126	25	17	2	5	7-11	2-4	0	-17	17/2/5	2,669	5 points harsher than his season, from 34 comments.
Apr 25R1 G4	R1 G4	vs NYKL 98–114	L 98–114	30	6	9	6	3-7	0-2	2	-9	6/9/6	2,501	44 points harsher than his season, from 34 comments.
Apr 23R1 G3	R1 G3	vs NYKW 109–108	W 109–108	33	8	13	6	3-7	1-2	5	+4	8/13/6	6,607	8 points harsher than his season, from 87 comments.
Apr 20R1 G2	R1 G2	@ NYKW 107–106	W 107–106	26	6	4	2	2-5	0-1	0	-15	6/4/2	5,421	16 points harsher than his season, from 61 comments.
Apr 18R1 G1	R1 G1	@ NYKL 102–113	L 102–113	36	4	9	11	2-7	0-2	2	-3	4/9/11	4,288	20 points harsher than his season, from 43 comments.