Derrick White · Court Sentiment

Verdict

28.1%32.8%39.1%

28.1%Negative655 comments

32.8%Neutral765 comments

39.1%Positive912 comments

+11Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=2,332 comments about Derrick WhiteUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Derrick White, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.DET flair
I fucking hate Derrick White
Post-game thread · DET 112 @ BOS 105 · Dec 15▲ 165Dec 16, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.CHI flair
It means Derrick White is a fucking idiot.
Post · Derrick White clears the record and says he indeed does NOT believe in the moon landing: "I don't think we did. I'm a non-moon landing guy. We probably did, but I don't think we did...I have other conspiracies, but I don't know if this is the right time to bring them up"▲ 151Mar 23, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.MEM flair
Derrick white and payton pritchard have been terrible in both games. If they are this bad all series celtics still might win this series but they aren't going to do shit in the playoffs.
Post-game thread · PHI 111 @ BOS 97 · R1 G2 · Apr 21▲ 68Apr 22, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Derrick White that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Derrick White, his own Celtics fans are 23% negative, rival fans 28%, unflaired commenters 32%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

22.8%Own fansBOS flair · 499 comments

27.9%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,070 comments

31.7%Unflairedno flair · 763 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Derrick White are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Derrick White was talked about most on the front page: 1,229 of his 2,332 comments, +16 net sentiment against +11 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads, −5 on 18% of his comments; his warmest the front page. The game threads ran 21 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads18% of his commentsHarshest38.233.0424

Front page53% of his commentsWarmest25.140.81,229

Highlights9% of his comments22.537.3204

News12% of his comments24.839.3290

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Derrick White; left out here: Post-game threads (171), Daily chat thread (10), Lowlights (2), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Derrick White ran between 15% and 45%. His worst week was the week of May 18, 51% negative of 102 comments; his best the week of Mar 9, 60% positive. 11 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W @ MEM 121–103
- W vs CLE 138–107
Oct 13 · 22 comments, under the floor
- W vs TOR 110–108
Oct 20 · 19% negative · 31% positive · 42 comments
- L vs PHI 116–117
- L @ NYK 95–105
- L @ DET 113–119
Oct 27 · 24% negative · 34% positive · 58 comments
- W @ NOP 122–90
- W vs CLE 125–105
- W @ PHI 109–108
- L vs HOU 101–128
Nov 3 · 27% negative · 41% positive · 49 comments
- L vs UTA 103–105
- W vs WAS 136–107
- L @ ORL 110–123
- W @ ORL 111–107
Nov 10 · 35% negative · 45% positive · 31 comments
- L @ PHI 100–102
- W vs MEM 131–95
- W vs LAC 121–118
Nov 17 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 113–99
- L vs BKN 105–113
- W vs ORL 138–129
Nov 24 · 21% negative · 34% positive · 38 comments
- W vs DET 117–114
- L @ MIN 115–119
Dec 1 · 22% negative · 34% positive · 32 comments
- W vs NYK 123–117
- W @ WAS 146–101
- W vs LAL 126–105
- W @ TOR 121–113
Dec 8 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIL 101–116
Dec 15 · 18% negative · 58% positive · 66 comments
- L vs DET 105–112
- W vs MIA 129–116
- W @ TOR 112–96
Dec 22 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W vs IND 103–95
- W @ IND 140–122
- L @ POR 108–114
Dec 29 · 24% negative · 58% positive · 45 comments
- W @ UTA 129–119
- W @ SAC 120–106
- W @ LAC 146–115
Jan 5 · 12% negative · 49% positive · 49 comments
- W vs CHI 115–101
- L vs DEN 110–114
- W vs TOR 125–117
- L vs SAS 95–100
Jan 12 · 23% negative · 54% positive · 35 comments
- L @ IND 96–98
- W @ MIA 119–114
- W @ ATL 132–106
Jan 19 · 22 comments, under the floor
- L @ DET 103–104
- W vs IND 119–104
- L @ CHI 111–114
Jan 26 · 36% negative · 19% positive · 36 comments
- W vs POR 102–94
- L vs ATL 106–117
- W vs SAC 112–93
- W vs MIL 107–79
Feb 2 · 16% negative · 52% positive · 67 comments
- W @ DAL 110–100
- W @ HOU 114–93
- W vs MIA 98–96
- L vs NYK 89–111
Feb 9 · 22% negative · 56% positive · 32 comments
- W vs CHI 124–105
Feb 16 · 24% negative · 53% positive · 49 comments
- W @ GSW 121–110
- W @ LAL 111–89
Feb 23 · 11% negative · 54% positive · 72 comments
- W @ PHX 97–81
- L @ DEN 84–103
- W vs BKN 148–111
- W vs PHI 114–98
Mar 2 · 10% negative · 50% positive · 94 comments
- W @ MIL 108–81
- L vs CHA 89–118
- W vs DAL 120–100
- W @ CLE 109–98
Mar 9 · 17% negative · 60% positive · 145 comments
- L @ SAS 116–125
- W vs WAS 111–100
Mar 16 · 24% negative · 50% positive · 46 comments
- W vs PHX 120–112
- W vs GSW 120–99
- W @ MEM 117–112
- L vs MIN 92–102
Mar 23 · 34% negative · 23% positive · 118 comments
- W vs OKC 119–109
- W vs ATL 109–102
Mar 30 · 40% negative · 23% positive · 47 comments
- L @ ATL 102–112
- W @ MIA 147–129
- W @ MIL 133–101
- W vs TOR 115–101
Apr 6 · 20% negative · 39% positive · 90 comments
- W vs CHA 113–102
- L @ NYK 106–112
- W vs NOP 144–118
Apr 13 · 22% negative · 41% positive · 83 comments
- W vs PHI 123–91
Apr 20 · 44% negative · 36% positive · 126 comments
- L vs PHI 97–111
- W @ PHI 108–100
- W @ PHI 128–96
Apr 27 · 49% negative · 24% positive · 325 comments
- L vs PHI 97–113
- L @ PHI 93–106
- L vs PHI 100–109

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Derrick White in 6 of his 87 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −15 in losses (47% negative, 32% positive) against −9 in wins (48% negative, 39% positive), on a season net sentiment of +11.

−9In wins48% neg · 39% pos · 33 comments

−15In losses47% neg · 32% pos · 247 comments

+11His season28% neg · 39% pos · 2,332 comments

Games the room talked about Derrick White in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 2R1 G7	R1 G7	vs PHIL 100–109	L 100–109	45	26	6	4	9-26	5-16	0	-6	26/6/4	22,263	29 points harsher than his season, from 137 comments.
Apr 30R1 G6	R1 G6	@ PHIL 93–106	L 93–106	32	11	1	1	3-8	3-6	2	-25	11/1/1	5,666	34 points harsher than his season, from 31 comments.
Apr 28R1 G5	R1 G5	vs PHIL 97–113	L 97–113	36	6	1	3	2-8	0-4	1	-14	6/1/3	3,329	68 points harsher than his season, from 30 comments.
Apr 24R1 G3	R1 G3	@ PHIW 108–100	W 108–100	34	11	4	2	3-12	1-8	2	-6	11/4/2	5,048	20 points harsher than his season, from 33 comments.
Apr 21R1 G2	R1 G2	vs PHIL 97–111	L 97–111	39	8	2	3	3-12	2-10	3	-8	8/2/3	3,868	49 points harsher than his season, from 26 comments.
Mar 10		@ SASL 116–125	L 116–125	40	34	5	7	11-22	3-11	1	-14	34/5/7	2,431	80 points warmer than his season, from 23 comments.