What the room said about Dean Wade, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.
Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
I am still confused and don't understand why Dean Wade refused to fight over a damn screen.
All the Knicks were doing was screening Dean wade to get him off brunson, and dean Wade refused to fight over a damn screen. And why didn't Atkinson if he was upset with Dean Wade not fighting over a screen, not go back to Max strus who would have definitely fought over the screen, to keep harden from being forced to guard brunson. Dean Wade really sold James harden out.
Exhibit 02Negative.MIN flair
Dean Wade is just a wet fart out there right now: hands Cade 3 free points with a dumb ass foul and then blows his wad trying to grab a wide open offensive rebound and just misses it. 5 points right there.
Exhibit 03Negative.BOS flair
Fuck you Dean Wade
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Dean Wade that cleared the classifier's confidence bar
and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.
Fans
Of what r/NBA says about Dean Wade, his own Cavaliers fans are 36% negative, rival fans 46%, unflaired commenters 45%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.
35.7%Own fansCLE flair · 112 comments
46.2%Rival fansevery other flair · 197 comments
44.7%Unflairedno flair · 123 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Dean Wade are left out of the lists;
the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Rooms
Only one room holds enough comments about Dean Wade to split. In the game threads, 205 of his 432 comments, −29 net sentiment against −22 across his season.
% neg% posn
Game threads47% of his comments50.221.0205
Method
A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Dean Wade; left out here: Front page (115), Post-game threads (45), Highlights (34), News (29), Daily chat thread (4). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Timeline
Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Dean Wade ran between 24% and 50%. His worst week was the week of May 11, 55% negative of 73 comments; his best the week of Apr 20, 46% positive. 36 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.
worst week best week · hover or tap a week for its games.
4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.
Games
The room talked about Dean Wade in 3 of his 81 games, at least 20 comments each. It was warmer after losses: net sentiment −15 in losses (40% negative, 25% positive) against −62 in wins (62% negative, 0% positive), on a season net sentiment of −22.
−62In wins62% neg · 0% pos · 21 comments
−15In losses40% neg · 25% pos · 52 comments
−22His season43% neg · 21% pos · 432 comments
Games the room talked about Dean Wade in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date
Phase
Opp
Result
Min
Pts
Reb
Ast
FG
3P
TOV
+/−
P/R/A
Comments
Verdict
May 19R3 G1
R3 G1
@ NYKL 104–115
L 104–115
29
10
5
3
3-5
3-5
0
+1
10/5/3
19,144
+22n=3022 points warmer than his season, from 30 comments.
May 13R2 G5
R2 G5
@ DETW 117–113
W 117–113
23
0
6
0
0-0
0-0
0
+2
0/6/0
12,686
−40n=2140 points harsher than his season, from 21 comments.
May 5R2 G1
R2 G1
@ DETL 101–111
L 101–111
28
5
3
1
2-3
1-2
0
-4
5/3/1
5,785
−14n=2214 points harsher than his season, from 22 comments.