What the room said about Clint Capela, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.
Exhibit 01Negative.DAL flair
Clint Crapela
Exhibit 02Negative.HOU flair
Never speak on Clint again bum
Exhibit 03Negative.HOU flair
the way we're going to look after replacing him with the corpse of clint capela will make our recent slump look like we were the '96 bulls
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Clint Capela that cleared the classifier's confidence bar
and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.
Fans
Of what r/NBA says about Clint Capela, his own Rockets fans are 25% negative, rival fans 34%, unflaired commenters 37%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.
24.6%Own fansHOU flair · 114 comments
34.1%Rival fansevery other flair · 572 comments
37.0%Unflairedno flair · 411 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Clint Capela are left out of the lists;
the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Rooms
Clint Capela was talked about most on the front page: 441 of his 1,097 comments, +2 net sentiment against −7 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −12 on 30% of his comments; his warmest the front page.
% neg% posn
Front page40% of his commentsWarmest30.832.4441
News30% of his commentsHarshest35.322.8329
Method
A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Clint Capela; left out here: Game threads (151), Highlights (103), Post-game threads (62), Lowlights (9), Daily chat thread (1), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Timeline
Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Clint Capela ran between 22% and 42%. His worst week was the week of May 4, 53% negative of 40 comments; his best the week of Feb 23, 34% positive. 33 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.
May 4 · 53% negative · 15% positive · 40 commentsNo games
May 11 · 17 comments, under the floorNo games
May 18 · 4 comments, under the floorNo games
May 25 · 11 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 1 · 1 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 8 · no commentsNo games
Jun 15 · 9 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 22 · 15 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 29 · 6 comments, under the floorNo games
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun
worst week best week · hover or tap a week for its games.
4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.
Games
The room talked about Clint Capela in 2 of his 82 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.
—In winstoo few graded wins
−15In losses37% neg · 22% pos · 54 comments
−7His season34% neg · 27% pos · 1,097 comments
Games the room talked about Clint Capela in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date
Phase
Opp
Result
Min
Pts
Reb
Ast
FG
3P
TOV
+/−
P/R/A
Comments
Verdict
Mar 16
vs LALL 92–100
L 92–100
26
9
8
2
3-4
0-0
3
-2
9/8/2
1,991
+3n=283 points warmer than his season, from 28 comments.
Oct 21
@ OKCL 124–125
L 124–125
8
4
0
0
1-1
0-0
1
+5
4/0/0
20,023
−20n=2620 points harsher than his season, from 26 comments.