Andrew Nembhard · Court Sentiment

Verdict

20.8%41.2%38.1%

20.8%Negative154 comments

41.2%Neutral305 comments

38.1%Positive282 comments

+17Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=741 comments about Andrew NembhardUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Andrew Nembhard, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.NYK flair
Why the fuck is there a second Nembhard out there. Isn't one Nembhard skullfucking us enough ?
Post · Ryan Nembhard in his last two games as a starter: 21.5/4/11.5 on 75.0/87.5/100.0* splits to only 0.5 turnovers▲ 18Dec 4, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
You’re right I should have mentioned nembhard is a fraud and will never have a postseason linsanity run again
Game thread · MIL 117 @ IND 115 · Nov 3▲ 3Nov 4, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.GSW flair
Nembhard needs to be locked up. Can't believe he had the balls to do something so egregious and disgusting on live TV. Immediately after this happened, I saw two kids fighting outside. That's not a coincidence. He's poisoning our youth!
Post · [Highlight] Jalen Brunson fouled HARD by Andrew Nembhard▲ 1Dec 19, 2025Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Andrew Nembhard that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Andrew Nembhard, his own Pacers fans are 20% negative, rival fans 24%, unflaired commenters 16%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

20.1%Own fansIND flair · 159 comments

23.9%Rival fansevery other flair · 364 comments

16.1%Unflairedno flair · 218 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Andrew Nembhard are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Only one room holds enough comments about Andrew Nembhard to split. On the front page, 274 of his 741 comments, +20 net sentiment against +17 across his season.

Front page37% of his comments18.639.1274

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Andrew Nembhard; left out here: Game threads (148), Highlights (141), Post-game threads (84), News (73), Lowlights (11), Discussion posts (7), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Andrew Nembhard ran between 8% and 35%. His worst week was the week of Oct 20, 36% negative of 59 comments; his best the week of Dec 1, 56% positive. 35 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIN 135–134
Oct 13 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L vs SAS 108–124
- L @ SAS 104–133
Oct 20 · 36% negative · 22% positive · 59 comments
- L vs OKC 135–141
Nov 3 · 8 comments, under the floor
- L @ DEN 100–117
- L @ GSW 83–114
Nov 10 · 19 comments, under the floor
- L @ UTA 128–152
- L @ PHX 98–133
- L vs TOR 111–129
Nov 17 · 2 comments, under the floor
- L @ DET 112–127
- W vs CHA 127–118
- L @ CLE 109–120
Nov 24 · 20% negative · 34% positive · 44 comments
- L vs DET 117–122
- L @ TOR 95–97
- W vs CHI 103–101
Dec 1 · 11% negative · 56% positive · 123 comments
- L vs CLE 119–135
- L vs DEN 120–135
- W @ CHI 120–105
Dec 8 · 5% negative · 37% positive · 41 comments
- W vs SAC 116–105
- L @ PHI 105–115
- L vs WAS 89–108
Dec 15 · 32% negative · 28% positive · 88 comments
- L vs NYK 113–114
- L @ NOP 109–128
Dec 22 · 25 comments, under the floor
- L @ BOS 95–103
- L vs MIL 94–111
- L vs BOS 122–140
- L @ MIA 116–142
Dec 29 · 9 comments, under the floor
- L @ HOU 119–126
- L vs ORL 110–112
- L vs SAS 113–123
- L @ ORL 127–135
Jan 5 · 8 comments, under the floor
- L vs CLE 116–120
- W vs MIA 123–99
Jan 12 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W vs BOS 98–96
- L vs TOR 101–115
- W vs NOP 127–119
Jan 19 · 25 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHI 104–113
- L @ BOS 104–119
- W @ OKC 117–114
Jan 26 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L @ ATL 116–132
- W vs CHI 113–110
- W vs ATL 129–124
Feb 2 · 27 comments, under the floor
- L vs HOU 114–118
- L @ MIL 99–105
- L @ TOR 104–122
Feb 9 · 18 comments, under the floor
- W @ NYK 137–134
Feb 16 · 9 comments, under the floor
- L @ WAS 105–112
- L vs DAL 130–134
Feb 23 · 15 comments, under the floor
- L vs PHI 114–135
- L vs CHA 109–133
Mar 2 · 2 comments, under the floor
- L @ LAC 107–130
- L @ LAL 117–128
- L @ POR 111–131
Mar 9 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L vs PHX 108–123
- L vs NYK 92–101
Mar 16 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L @ SAS 119–134
Mar 23 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W @ ORL 128–126
- L vs LAL 130–137
- L vs LAC 113–114
- W vs MIA 135–118

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Andrew Nembhard in 1 of his 60 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

—In winstoo few graded wins

−15In losses31% neg · 15% pos · 26 comments

+17His season21% neg · 38% pos · 741 comments

Games the room talked about Andrew Nembhard in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Oct 23		vs OKCL 135–141	L 135–141	17	4	1	4	0-5	0-2	2	-3	4/1/4	8,773	33 points harsher than his season, from 26 comments.