Ajay Mitchell · Court Sentiment

Verdict

20.7%40.9%38.4%

20.7%Negative633 comments

40.9%Neutral1,255 comments

38.4%Positive1,177 comments

+18Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=3,065 comments about Ajay MitchellUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Ajay Mitchell, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.OKC flair
Ajay is most certainly done. Jdub didn’t look good out there in game 6, so he’s probably done too.
Post · Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 31.1 PPG in the regular season to 24.3 PPG in the Conference Finals is The biggest scoring falloff by an MVP Guard from the regular season to the Conference Finals EVER.▲ 210May 30, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
😭 no genuine way thunder fans are pissed off that their “3rd best player” was out so it didn’t count 🤣 we’re talking abt the same guy right, ajay mitchell 😹 like the guy who had 6 turnovers in two games combined, shot 38% and 0% from the three and better yet averaged 5 ppg😭 bro had the easiest matchup against my lakers and everyone was so quick to call him great
Post · Daily Discussion Thread + Game Thread Index | Playoffs▲ 17May 31, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.GSW flair
Ajay plays like a bitch too
Game thread · SAS 113 @ OKC 122 · R3 G2 · May 20▲ 8May 21, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Ajay Mitchell that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Ajay Mitchell, his own Thunder fans are 15% negative, rival fans 30%, unflaired commenters 24%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

14.6%Own fansOKC flair · 1,544 comments

29.8%Rival fansevery other flair · 714 comments

24.0%Unflairedno flair · 807 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Ajay Mitchell are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Ajay Mitchell was talked about most in the game threads: 1,267 of his 3,065 comments, +25 net sentiment against +18 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −6 on 8% of his comments; his warmest the post-game threads, +28 on 8% of his comments. The game threads ran 10 points warmer than the front page.

Game threads41% of his comments21.346.81,267

Post-game threads8% of his commentsWarmest15.843.8240

Front page35% of his comments18.133.21,077

Highlights7% of his comments26.727.7206

News8% of his commentsHarshest28.122.1231

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Ajay Mitchell; left out here: Daily chat thread (23), Injury posts (12), Lowlights (5), Discussion posts (4). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Ajay Mitchell ran between 4% and 37%. His worst week was the week of May 18, 45% negative of 317 comments; his best the week of Oct 20, 73% positive. 13 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L @ IND 101–116
Oct 20 · 4% negative · 73% positive · 112 comments
- W vs HOU 125–124
- W @ IND 141–135
- W @ ATL 117–100
Oct 27 · 5% negative · 53% positive · 58 comments
- W @ DAL 101–94
- W vs SAC 107–101
- W vs WAS 127–108
- W vs NOP 137–106
Nov 3 · 11% negative · 65% positive · 62 comments
- W @ LAC 126–107
- L @ POR 119–121
- W @ SAC 132–101
- W @ MEM 114–100
Nov 10 · 12% negative · 52% positive · 134 comments
- W vs GSW 126–102
- W vs LAL 121–92
- W @ CHA 109–96
Nov 17 · 21% negative · 42% positive · 38 comments
- W @ NOP 126–109
- W vs SAC 113–99
- W @ UTA 144–112
- W vs POR 122–95
Nov 24 · 7% negative · 53% positive · 116 comments
- W vs MIN 113–105
- W vs PHX 123–119
- W @ POR 123–115
Dec 1 · 4% negative · 29% positive · 55 comments
- W @ GSW 124–112
- W vs DAL 132–111
- W @ UTA 131–101
Dec 8 · 13% negative · 43% positive · 30 comments
- W vs PHX 138–89
- L vs SAS 109–111
Dec 15 · 12% negative · 47% positive · 34 comments
- W vs LAC 122–101
- L @ MIN 107–112
Dec 22 · 27% negative · 15% positive · 41 comments
- W vs MEM 119–103
- W vs PHI 129–104
Dec 29 · 26 comments, under the floor
- W vs ATL 140–129
- W vs POR 124–95
- W @ GSW 131–94
- L @ PHX 105–108
Jan 5 · 9% negative · 44% positive · 32 comments
- L vs CHA 97–124
- W vs UTA 129–125
- W @ MEM 117–116
- W vs MIA 124–112
Jan 12 · 7% negative · 49% positive · 59 comments
- W vs SAS 119–98
- W @ HOU 111–91
- L @ MIA 120–122
Jan 19 · 14% negative · 42% positive · 65 comments
- W @ CLE 136–104
- W @ MIL 122–102
Mar 9 · 13% negative · 52% positive · 141 comments
- W vs DEN 129–126
- W vs BOS 104–102
- W vs MIN 116–103
Mar 16 · 38% negative · 12% positive · 149 comments
- W @ ORL 113–108
- W @ BKN 121–92
- W @ WAS 132–111
Mar 23 · 24% negative · 32% positive · 34 comments
- L @ BOS 109–119
- W vs CHI 131–113
- W vs NYK 111–100
Mar 30 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W vs DET 114–110
- W vs LAL 139–96
- W vs UTA 146–111
Apr 6 · 27 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAL 123–87
- W @ LAC 128–110
Apr 13 · 12% negative · 44% positive · 52 comments
- W vs PHX 119–84
Apr 20 · 23% negative · 36% positive · 74 comments
- W vs PHX 120–107
- W @ PHX 121–109
Apr 27 · 30% negative · 45% positive · 33 comments
- W @ PHX 131–122
May 4 · 19% negative · 56% positive · 402 comments
- W vs LAL 108–90
- W vs LAL 125–107
- W @ LAL 131–108
May 11 · 18% negative · 45% positive · 419 comments
- W @ LAL 115–110
May 18 · 45% negative · 13% positive · 317 comments
- L vs SAS 115–122
- W vs SAS 122–113
- W @ SAS 123–108

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Ajay Mitchell in 21 of his 69 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −24 in losses (45% negative, 21% positive) against +32 in wins (20% negative, 52% positive), on a season net sentiment of +18.

+32In wins20% neg · 52% pos · 979 comments

−24In losses45% neg · 21% pos · 84 comments

+18His season21% neg · 38% pos · 3,065 comments

Games the room talked about Ajay Mitchell in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 22R3 G3	R3 G3	@ SASW 123–108	W 123–108	17	2	5	1	1-5	0-1	3	-3	2/5/1	31,843	61 points harsher than his season, from 60 comments.
May 20R3 G2	R3 G2	vs SASW 122–113	W 122–113	28	10	0	2	4-8	0-2	3	+11	10/0/2	35,453	52 points harsher than his season, from 64 comments.
May 18R3 G1	R3 G1	vs SASL 115–122	L 115–122	34	4	4	5	2-5	0-1	0	+7	4/4/5	53,003	63 points harsher than his season, from 62 comments.
May 11R2 G4	R2 G4	@ LALW 115–110	W 115–110	33	28	3	4	12-19	1-4	1	+17	28/3/4	13,015	19 points warmer than his season, from 191 comments.
May 9R2 G3	R2 G3	@ LALW 131–108	W 131–108	30	24	4	10	10-17	2-4	0	+14	24/4/10	13,634	35 points warmer than his season, from 193 comments.
May 7R2 G2	R2 G2	vs LALW 125–107	W 125–107	30	20	3	6	7-12	0-3	2	+18	20/3/6	21,807	5 points warmer than his season, from 80 comments.
May 5R2 G1	R2 G1	vs LALW 108–90	W 108–90	28	18	2	4	7-16	1-5	1	+14	18/2/4	11,399	22 points warmer than his season, from 25 comments.
Apr 27R1 G4	R1 G4	@ PHXW 131–122	W 131–122	34	22	4	6	7-16	4-6	3	+27	22/4/6	3,366	At his season, from 22 comments.
Apr 25R1 G3	R1 G3	@ PHXW 121–109	W 121–109	32	15	6	2	5-20	1-5	1	+15	15/6/2	4,418	18 points harsher than his season, from 22 comments.
Apr 22R1 G2	R1 G2	vs PHXW 120–107	W 120–107	29	14	5	5	5-12	1-5	1	+9	14/5/5	6,598	22 points warmer than his season, from 20 comments.

Bad nights get punished: across 21 games the room talked about, net sentiment rises with Ajay Mitchell's Game Score.

r = 0.56 · 21 games · win loss