Alperen Sengun · Court Sentiment

Verdict

49.7%29.2%21.2%

49.7%Negative4,884 comments

29.2%Neutral2,869 comments

21.2%Positive2,083 comments

−28Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=9,836 comments about Alperen Sengun

Receipts

What the room said about Alperen Sengun, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Sengun straight ASS tonight.
Post-game thread · DEN 112 @ HOU 109 · Nov 21▲ 759Nov 22, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.PHX flair
What a piece of shit. Then he acts all innocent like, then calls her a bitch again. The only little bitch I see on that court is Sengun.
Post · Full video of the altercation. Sengun: “He’s up on me.. you a b*tch!” Jaylen Brown: “Woah! Hey, get him out of here!” Ref: “He can’t call me that, no!” As Sengun was getting ejected, he called her a b*tch again. The Rockets were celebrating National Girls and Women’s in Sports Day.▲ 586Feb 7, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.NYK flair
Sengun is cheeks bro. How are you a center who doesn’t shoot threes and can’t play defense and have that as your TS%?
Post · Least efficient players in the NBA averaging at least 15 PPG: Derrick White (52.9% TS), LaMelo Ball (53.3%), Russell Westbrook (53.3%), VJ Edgecombe (53.6%), Cooper Flagg (54.6%), Dillon Brooks (54.7%), Shaedon Sharpe (55.0%), Anthony Black (55.2%), Alperen Sengun (55.4%), Bam Adebayo (55.5%)▲ 488Mar 12, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Alperen Sengun that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Alperen Sengun, his own Rockets fans are 32% negative, rival fans 53%, unflaired commenters 50%. Among the 9 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Timberwolves fans are hardest on him at 64% negative and Rockets fans kindest at 33% positive.

31.8%Own fansHOU flair · 913 comments

52.7%Rival fansevery other flair · 5,060 comments

49.9%Unflairedno flair · 3,863 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Alperen Sengun are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Alperen Sengun was talked about most in the game threads: 4,032 of his 9,836 comments, −34 net sentiment against −28 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads; his warmest news posts, −16 on 8% of his comments. The game threads ran 9 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads41% of his commentsHarshest55.921.74,032

Post-game threads6% of his comments56.322.7560

Front page30% of his comments45.420.32,930

Highlights14% of his comments45.522.11,424

News8% of his commentsWarmest36.220.2768

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Alperen Sengun; left out here: Lowlights (71), Daily chat thread (28), Injury posts (10), Discussion posts (8). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Alperen Sengun ran between 21% and 61%. His worst week was the week of Apr 20, 62% negative of 1,538 comments; his best the week of Oct 6, 58% positive. 4 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 16% negative · 58% positive · 64 comments
- W vs ATL 122–113
- W vs UTA 140–127
Oct 13 · 28% negative · 40% positive · 47 comments
- W @ NOP 130–128
Oct 20 · 29% negative · 48% positive · 899 comments
- L @ OKC 124–125
- L vs DET 111–115
Oct 27 · 22% negative · 36% positive · 55 comments
- W vs BKN 137–109
- W @ TOR 139–121
- W @ BOS 128–101
Nov 3 · 50% negative · 27% positive · 391 comments
- W vs DAL 110–102
- W @ MEM 124–109
- L @ SAS 110–121
- W @ MIL 122–115
Nov 10 · 29% negative · 45% positive · 170 comments
- W vs WAS 135–112
- W vs POR 140–116
- W vs ORL 117–113
Nov 17 · 37% negative · 37% positive · 545 comments
- W @ CLE 114–104
- L vs DEN 109–112
Nov 24 · 30% negative · 33% positive · 97 comments
- W @ PHX 114–92
- W @ GSW 104–100
- W @ UTA 129–101
Dec 1 · 30% negative · 34% positive · 144 comments
- L @ UTA 125–133
- W vs SAC 121–95
Dec 8 · 33% negative · 30% positive · 90 comments
- W vs LAC 115–113
Dec 15 · 47% negative · 17% positive · 423 comments
- L @ DEN 125–128
- L @ NOP 128–133
- W @ DEN 115–101
- L @ SAC 124–125
Dec 22 · 50% negative · 21% positive · 121 comments
- L @ LAC 108–128
- W @ LAL 119–96
Dec 29 · 38% negative · 17% positive · 48 comments
- W @ BKN 120–96
- L @ DAL 104–110
Jan 5 · 30% negative · 21% positive · 73 comments
- L @ SAC 98–111
Jan 12 · 52% negative · 18% positive · 174 comments
- W vs CHI 119–113
- L vs OKC 91–111
- W vs MIN 110–105
- W vs NOP 119–110
Jan 19 · 54% negative · 14% positive · 199 comments
- W vs SAS 111–106
- L @ PHI 122–128
- W @ DET 111–104
Jan 26 · 43% negative · 24% positive · 209 comments
- W vs MEM 108–99
- L vs SAS 99–111
- W @ ATL 104–86
- W vs DAL 111–107
Feb 2 · 57% negative · 8% positive · 723 comments
- W @ IND 118–114
- L vs BOS 93–114
- L vs CHA 99–109
- W @ OKC 112–106
Feb 9 · 45% negative · 20% positive · 146 comments
- W vs LAC 102–95
- L vs LAC 102–105
Feb 16 · 61% negative · 12% positive · 289 comments
- W @ CHA 105–101
- L @ NYK 106–108
Feb 23 · 45% negative · 18% positive · 181 comments
- W vs UTA 125–105
- W vs SAC 128–97
- W @ ORL 113–108
- L @ MIA 105–115
Mar 2 · 53% negative · 17% positive · 100 comments
- W @ WAS 123–118
- L vs GSW 113–115
- W vs POR 106–99
- L @ SAS 120–145
Mar 9 · 59% negative · 8% positive · 285 comments
- W vs TOR 113–99
- L @ DEN 93–129
Mar 16 · 55% negative · 8% positive · 121 comments
- L vs LAL 116–124
- W vs ATL 117–95
- W vs MIA 123–122
Mar 23 · 54% negative · 20% positive · 353 comments
- L @ CHI 124–132
- L @ MIN 108–110
- W @ MEM 119–109
- W @ NOP 134–102
Mar 30 · 29% negative · 32% positive · 59 comments
- W vs NYK 111–94
- W vs MIL 119–113
- W vs UTA 140–106
- W @ GSW 117–116
Apr 6 · 47% negative · 18% positive · 152 comments
- W @ PHX 119–105
- W vs PHI 113–102
- L vs MIN 132–136
Apr 13 · 61% negative · 15% positive · 418 comments
- L @ LAL 98–107
Apr 20 · 62% negative · 17% positive · 1,538 comments
- L @ LAL 94–101
- L vs LAL 108–112
- W vs LAL 115–96
Apr 27 · 61% negative · 12% positive · 1,176 comments
- W @ LAL 99–93
- L vs LAL 78–98

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Alperen Sengun in 30 of his 81 games, at least 20 comments each. It was warmer after losses: net sentiment −34 in losses (56% negative, 23% positive) against −36 in wins (56% negative, 20% positive), on a season net sentiment of −28.

−36In wins56% neg · 20% pos · 794 comments

−34In losses56% neg · 23% pos · 3,242 comments

−28His season50% neg · 21% pos · 9,836 comments

Games the room talked about Alperen Sengun in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 1R1 G6	R1 G6	vs LALL 78–98	L 78–98	38	17	11	1	5-12	0-0	4	-27	17/11/1	7,226	22 points harsher than his season, from 365 comments.
Apr 29R1 G5	R1 G5	@ LALW 99–93	W 99–93	43	14	9	8	5-9	0-0	5	+8	14/9/8	6,820	23 points harsher than his season, from 196 comments.
Apr 26R1 G4	R1 G4	vs LALW 115–96	W 115–96	33	19	6	2	6-12	0-0	2	+7	19/6/2	4,414	30 points harsher than his season, from 208 comments.
Apr 24R1 G3	R1 G3	vs LALL 108–112	L 108–112	47	33	16	6	15-27	1-5	3	+10	33/16/6	12,328	13 points harsher than his season, from 528 comments.
Apr 21R1 G2	R1 G2	@ LALL 94–101	L 94–101	35	20	11	5	9-20	0-1	1	+1	20/11/5	8,572	36 points harsher than his season, from 441 comments.
Apr 18R1 G1	R1 G1	@ LALL 98–107	L 98–107	36	19	8	6	6-19	0-2	3	-2	19/8/6	5,925	28 points harsher than his season, from 220 comments.
Apr 5		@ GSWW 117–116	W 117–116	37	24	6	7	10-19	1-5	2	-1	24/6/7	885	At his season, from 21 comments.
Mar 25		@ MINL 108–110	L 108–110	43	30	6	3	12-22	0-2	1	-2	30/6/3	2,390	10 points harsher than his season, from 175 comments.
Mar 18		vs LALL 116–124	L 116–124	37	27	4	10	10-15	1-2	2	+7	27/4/10	2,169	34 points harsher than his season, from 45 comments.
Mar 11		@ DENL 93–129	L 93–129	24	10	2	3	5-8	0-1	2	-17	10/2/3	616	34 points harsher than his season, from 27 comments.

Bad nights get punished: across 30 games the room talked about, net sentiment rises with Alperen Sengun's Game Score.

r = 0.43 · 30 games · win loss