Al Horford · Court Sentiment

Verdict

26.3%41.5%32.1%

26.3%Negative461 comments

41.5%Neutral727 comments

32.1%Positive562 comments

+6Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=1,750 comments about Al HorfordUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Al Horford, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.LAL flair
A center rotation of Dray, Post, and beyond washed Horford will do that to you
Post · Jonathan Kuminga in his first 3 games in ATL: 21.3 points, 7.7 rebounds and 3.3 assists per game on 79% TS, +59▲ 44Mar 2, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.PHI flair
Fuck Al horford
Post-game thread · PHI 113 @ GSW 94 · Feb 3▲ 15Feb 4, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
Al Horford is going to be retired or completely washed by next season.
Post · Al Horford is Draymond greens replacement▲ 13Feb 23, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Al Horford that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Al Horford, his own Warriors fans are 19% negative, rival fans 29%, unflaired commenters 25%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

19.2%Own fansGSW flair · 182 comments

28.7%Rival fansevery other flair · 994 comments

24.6%Unflairedno flair · 574 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Al Horford are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Al Horford was talked about most on the front page: 589 of his 1,750 comments, −5 net sentiment against +6 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −8 on 20% of his comments; his warmest the game threads, +26 on 22% of his comments. The front page ran 31 points harsher than the game threads, the reverse of the usual order: his season was a story off the court.

Game threads22% of his commentsWarmest23.549.9383

Front page34% of his comments27.222.1589

News20% of his commentsHarshest28.720.8342

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Al Horford; left out here: Highlights (187), Post-game threads (176), Daily chat thread (57), Lowlights (6), Discussion posts (4), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Al Horford ran between 17% and 42%. His worst week was the week of Mar 9, 50% negative of 30 comments; his best the week of Apr 13, 59% positive. 20 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W vs LAL 111–103
Oct 6 · 22% negative · 49% positive · 37 comments
- W vs POR 129–123
Oct 13 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W @ POR 118–111
- L vs LAC 103–106
Oct 20 · 25% negative · 36% positive · 162 comments
- W @ LAL 119–109
- W vs DEN 137–131
Oct 27 · 45% negative · 15% positive · 40 comments
- W vs LAC 98–79
- L @ MIL 110–120
- L @ IND 109–114
Nov 3 · 46% negative · 8% positive · 37 comments
- L @ SAC 116–121
- W vs IND 114–83
Nov 10 · 19 comments, under the floor
- W @ SAS 125–120
- W @ SAS 109–108
- W @ NOP 124–106
Nov 17 · 24 comments, under the floor
- L @ ORL 113–121
- L vs POR 123–127
Dec 1 · 33% negative · 25% positive · 36 comments
- L @ PHI 98–99
Dec 22 · 28% negative · 35% positive · 43 comments
- W vs DAL 126–116
- L @ TOR 127–141
Dec 29 · 38% negative · 13% positive · 52 comments
- W @ CHA 132–125
- L vs OKC 94–131
Jan 5 · 22 comments, under the floor
- L @ LAC 102–103
- W vs MIL 120–113
- W vs SAC 137–103
- L vs ATL 111–124
Jan 12 · 23% negative · 26% positive · 31 comments
- W vs POR 119–97
- W vs NYK 126–113
- W vs CHA 136–116
Jan 19 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIA 135–112
- L @ DAL 115–123
- W @ MIN 111–85
Jan 26 · 27% negative · 43% positive · 30 comments
- W @ UTA 140–124
- L vs DET 124–131
Feb 2 · 21% negative · 30% positive · 86 comments
- L vs PHI 94–113
- W @ PHX 101–97
- L @ LAL 99–105
Feb 9 · 29% negative · 18% positive · 72 comments
- W vs MEM 114–113
- L vs SAS 113–126
Feb 16 · 26% negative · 23% positive · 47 comments
- L vs BOS 110–121
- W vs DEN 128–117
Feb 23 · 29 comments, under the floor
- W @ MEM 133–112
- L vs LAL 101–129
Mar 2 · 22% negative · 43% positive · 49 comments
- L vs LAC 101–114
- W @ HOU 115–113
- L @ OKC 97–104
Mar 9 · 50% negative · 3% positive · 30 comments
- L vs CHI 124–130
- L vs MIN 117–127
Apr 6 · 24 comments, under the floor
- L @ SAC 118–124
- L @ LAC 110–115
Apr 13 · 17% negative · 59% positive · 361 comments
- W @ LAC 126–121
- L @ PHX 96–111

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Al Horford in 3 of his 51 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

+41In wins18% neg · 58% pos · 286 comments

—In lossestoo few graded losses

+6His season26% neg · 32% pos · 1,750 comments

Games the room talked about Al Horford in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 15Play-in	Play-in	@ LACW 126–121	W 126–121	22	14	3	0	5-8	4-7	2	-7	14/3/0	6,468	46 points warmer than his season, from 196 comments.
Oct 23		vs DENW 137–131	W 137–131	29	13	3	2	5-7	3-4	2	+6	13/3/2	4,998	31 points warmer than his season, from 41 comments.
Oct 21		@ LALW 119–109	W 119–109	20	5	5	1	2-7	1-4	2	-10	5/5/1	6,775	6 points harsher than his season, from 49 comments.