Tobias Harris · Court Sentiment

Verdict

51.6%26.6%21.8%

51.6%Negative1,553 comments

26.6%Neutral801 comments

21.8%Positive658 comments

−30Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=3,012 comments about Tobias HarrisUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Tobias Harris, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Honorable mention: *"Tobias Harris, let him walk. I mean, damn. He asked them if they wanted something from Chick-fil-A before the game, the team told him 'yes,' and he came back with a bag full of napkins and straws. I mean, he was just a no-show out there."*
Post · Kyrie Irving on Instagram: “All for one. One for All WE completed the mission together as brothers, and that’s all that matters to me.”▲ 596Jun 20, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.PHI flair
You need 10? Tobias Harris gives you 15; You need 20? Tobias Harris gives you 15.
Post-game thread · ORL 112 @ DET 101 · R1 G1 · Apr 19▲ 241Apr 20, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.NYK flair
There was that thing about Tobias Harris a couple years ago during the playoffs against the Knicks. It was something like "damn he sucks. Its like if Harris asked what did everyone want from Chic-Fil-a and all he came back with were napkins and straws."
Post · Kendrick Perkins on Ja Morant: “He has one foot on the grave the other on the banana peel when it comes down to his career. Ja Morant better wake the hell up cuz in 2 years after this contract he could find himself out of the league"▲ 137Feb 5, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Tobias Harris that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Tobias Harris, his own Pistons fans are 31% negative, rival fans 58%, unflaired commenters 52%. Among the 3 fanbases with at least 200 comments, 76ers fans are hardest on him at 71% negative and Pistons fans kindest at 35% positive.

31.2%Own fansDET flair · 487 comments

57.6%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,609 comments

51.9%Unflairedno flair · 916 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Tobias Harris are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Tobias Harris was talked about most in the game threads: 1,297 of his 3,012 comments, −24 net sentiment against −30 across his season. His harshest room was highlights, −40 on 10% of his comments; his warmest the game threads. The front page ran 10 points harsher than the game threads, the reverse of the usual order: his season was a story off the court.

Game threads43% of his commentsWarmest51.727.31,297

Post-game threads9% of his comments49.024.1257

Front page30% of his comments51.417.1901

Highlights10% of his commentsHarshest56.516.9313

News7% of his comments47.912.3211

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Tobias Harris; left out here: Daily chat thread (18), Lowlights (13), Discussion posts (1), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Tobias Harris ran between 29% and 66%. His worst week was the week of Apr 20, 67% negative of 210 comments; his best the week of May 4, 35% positive. 22 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W @ MEM 128–112
Oct 13 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ CLE 100–118
- W vs WAS 119–98
Oct 20 · 11 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHI 111–115
- W @ HOU 115–111
- W vs BOS 119–113
Oct 27 · 56% negative · 13% positive · 45 comments
- L vs CLE 95–116
- W vs ORL 135–116
- W vs DAL 122–110
Nov 17 · 37% negative · 13% positive · 30 comments
- W @ MIL 129–116
Nov 24 · 17 comments, under the floor
- W @ IND 122–117
- L @ BOS 114–117
- L vs ORL 109–112
- W @ MIA 138–135
Dec 1 · 10 comments, under the floor
- W vs ATL 99–98
- L @ MIL 109–113
- W vs POR 122–116
Dec 8 · 18 comments, under the floor
- W vs ATL 142–115
Dec 15 · 10 comments, under the floor
- W @ BOS 112–105
- L @ DAL 114–116
- W vs CHA 112–86
Dec 22 · 13 comments, under the floor
- W @ POR 110–102
- W @ SAC 136–127
- L @ UTA 129–131
- L @ LAC 99–112
Dec 29 · 22 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAL 128–106
Jan 12 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W vs PHX 108–105
- W vs IND 121–78
Jan 19 · 29 comments, under the floor
- W vs BOS 104–103
- W @ NOP 112–104
- L vs HOU 104–111
- W vs SAC 139–116
Jan 26 · 42% negative · 34% positive · 38 comments
- W @ DEN 109–107
- L @ PHX 96–114
- W @ GSW 131–124
- W vs BKN 130–77
Feb 2 · 43% negative · 11% positive · 37 comments
- W vs DEN 124–121
- W vs NYK 118–80
Feb 9 · 34% negative · 29% positive · 35 comments
- W @ CHA 110–104
- W @ TOR 113–95
Feb 16 · 17 comments, under the floor
- W @ NYK 126–111
- W @ CHI 126–110
Feb 23 · 50% negative · 23% positive · 44 comments
- L vs SAS 103–114
- W vs OKC 124–116
- W vs CLE 122–119
- W @ ORL 106–92
Mar 2 · 50% negative · 25% positive · 36 comments
- L @ CLE 109–113
- L @ SAS 106–121
- L vs BKN 105–107
- L @ MIA 110–121
Mar 9 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 138–100
- W vs PHI 131–109
- L @ TOR 108–119
Mar 16 · 6 comments, under the floor
- W @ WAS 130–117
- W @ WAS 117–95
- W vs GSW 115–101
Mar 23 · 49% negative · 15% positive · 55 comments
- W vs LAL 113–110
- L vs ATL 129–130
- W vs NOP 129–108
- W @ MIN 109–87
Mar 30 · 65% negative · 14% positive · 133 comments
- W vs TOR 127–116
- W vs MIN 113–108
- W @ PHI 116–93
Apr 6 · 22 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIL 137–111
- W @ CHA 118–100
- W @ IND 133–121
Apr 13 · 56% negative · 17% positive · 41 comments
- L vs ORL 101–112
Apr 20 · 67% negative · 11% positive · 210 comments
- W vs ORL 98–83
- L @ ORL 105–113
Apr 27 · 48% negative · 27% positive · 669 comments
- L @ ORL 88–94
- W vs ORL 116–109
- W @ ORL 93–79
- W vs ORL 116–94
May 4 · 38% negative · 35% positive · 420 comments
- W vs CLE 111–101
- W vs CLE 107–97
- L @ CLE 109–116
May 11 · 49% negative · 25% positive · 327 comments
- L @ CLE 103–112
- L vs CLE 113–117
- W @ CLE 115–94
- L vs CLE 94–125

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Tobias Harris in 14 of his 80 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −40 in losses (61% negative, 20% positive) against −7 in wins (42% negative, 35% positive), on a season net sentiment of −30.

−7In wins42% neg · 35% pos · 640 comments

−40In losses61% neg · 20% pos · 689 comments

−30His season52% neg · 22% pos · 3,012 comments

Games the room talked about Tobias Harris in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
May 17R2 G7	R2 G7	vs CLEL 94–125	L 94–125	23	5	5	2	0-6	0-2	1	-23	5/5/2	17,494	31 points harsher than his season, from 249 comments.
May 15R2 G6	R2 G6	@ CLEW 115–94	W 115–94	25	6	5	3	2-7	0-2	2	+6	6/5/3	9,941	15 points harsher than his season, from 52 comments.
May 13R2 G5	R2 G5	vs CLEL 113–117	L 113–117	40	13	6	3	6-19	1-7	0	-2	13/6/3	12,686	8 points warmer than his season, from 118 comments.
May 11R2 G4	R2 G4	@ CLEL 103–112	L 103–112	36	16	8	5	6-17	2-5	0	-12	16/8/5	6,878	27 points warmer than his season, from 65 comments.
May 9R2 G3	R2 G3	@ CLEL 109–116	L 109–116	38	21	5	0	7-14	2-3	1	+3	21/5/0	7,027	43 points warmer than his season, from 52 comments.
May 7R2 G2	R2 G2	vs CLEW 107–97	W 107–97	37	21	7	0	9-16	2-3	1	+8	21/7/0	7,260	38 points warmer than his season, from 150 comments.
May 5R2 G1	R2 G1	vs CLEW 111–101	W 111–101	39	20	8	1	6-14	1-5	2	+6	20/8/1	5,785	26 points warmer than his season, from 51 comments.
May 3R1 G7	R1 G7	vs ORLW 116–94	W 116–94	36	30	9	2	11-18	5-7	1	+22	30/9/2	7,685	34 points warmer than his season, from 275 comments.
May 1R1 G6	R1 G6	@ ORLW 93–79	W 93–79	38	22	10	0	7-20	2-7	0	+14	22/10/0	9,828	10 points harsher than his season, from 66 comments.
Apr 29R1 G5	R1 G5	vs ORLW 116–109	W 116–109	31	23	8	1	9-18	1-3	1	+6	23/8/1	5,060	5 points harsher than his season, from 23 comments.