What the room said about TJ McConnell, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.
No negative receipt about TJ McConnell cleared the bar this season.
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about TJ McConnell that cleared the classifier's confidence bar
and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.
Fans
Of what r/NBA says about TJ McConnell, his own Pacers fans are 27% negative, rival fans 20%, unflaired commenters 18%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.
26.6%Own fansIND flair · 64 comments
20.1%Rival fansevery other flair · 214 comments
17.5%Unflairedno flair · 114 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about TJ McConnell are left out of the lists;
the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Rooms
Only one room holds enough comments about TJ McConnell to split. On the front page, 203 of his 392 comments, +15 net sentiment against +17 across his season.
% neg% posn
Front page52% of his comments21.236.5203
Method
A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about TJ McConnell; left out here: Game threads (57), News (47), Highlights (46), Post-game threads (36), Daily chat thread (1), Discussion posts (1), Lowlights (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Timeline
Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about TJ McConnell ran between 6% and 30%. His worst week was the week of Dec 1, 25% negative of 32 comments; his best the week of Dec 1, 47% positive. 39 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.
PreseasonRegular seasonPlayoffsOff-season
Negative 6%Positive 42%
Sep 29 · 2 comments, under the floorNo games
Oct 6 · 8 comments, under the floor
W @ MIN 135–134
Oct 13 · 13 comments, under the floorNo games
Oct 20 · 17 comments, under the floorNo games
Oct 27 · 14 comments, under the floorNo games
Nov 3 · 15 comments, under the floorNo games
Nov 10 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ UTA 128–152
L @ PHX 98–133
L vs TOR 111–129
Nov 17 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ DET 112–127
W vs CHA 127–118
L @ CLE 109–120
Nov 24 · 18 comments, under the floor
L vs DET 117–122
L @ TOR 95–97
W vs WAS 119–86
W vs CHI 103–101
Dec 1 · 25% negative · 47% positive · 32 comments
L vs CLE 119–135
L vs DEN 120–135
W @ CHI 120–105
Dec 8 · 6 comments, under the floor
W vs SAC 116–105
L @ PHI 105–115
L vs WAS 89–108
Dec 15 · 9 comments, under the floor
L vs NYK 113–114
L @ NOP 109–128
Dec 22 · 7 comments, under the floor
L vs MIL 94–111
L vs BOS 122–140
Dec 29 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ HOU 119–126
L vs ORL 110–112
L vs SAS 113–123
L @ ORL 127–135
Jan 5 · 11 comments, under the floor
L vs CLE 116–120
W @ CHA 114–112
W vs MIA 123–99
Jan 12 · 10 comments, under the floor
W vs BOS 98–96
L vs TOR 101–115
W vs NOP 127–119
Jan 19 · 10 comments, under the floor
L @ PHI 104–113
L @ BOS 104–119
W @ OKC 117–114
Jan 26 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ ATL 116–132
W vs CHI 113–110
W vs ATL 129–124
Feb 2 · 17 comments, under the floor
L vs HOU 114–118
L @ MIL 99–105
L @ TOR 104–122
Feb 9 · 12 comments, under the floor
W @ NYK 137–134
Feb 16 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ WAS 118–131
Feb 23 · 16 comments, under the floor
L vs PHI 114–135
L vs CHA 109–133
L vs MEM 106–125
Mar 2 · 6 comments, under the floor
L @ LAC 107–130
L @ LAL 117–128
L @ POR 111–131
Mar 9 · 8 comments, under the floor
L vs NYK 92–101
L @ MIL 123–134
Mar 16 · 3 comments, under the floor
L @ NYK 110–136
L vs POR 119–127
L @ SAS 119–134
Mar 23 · 5 comments, under the floor
W @ ORL 128–126
L vs LAL 130–137
L vs LAC 113–114
W vs MIA 135–118
Mar 30 · 5 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 6 · 5 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 13 · 3 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 20 · 7 comments, under the floorNo games
Apr 27 · 5 comments, under the floorNo games
May 4 · 16 comments, under the floorNo games
May 11 · 11 comments, under the floorNo games
May 18 · 16 comments, under the floorNo games
May 25 · 12 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 1 · 7 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 8 · 7 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 15 · 15 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 22 · 14 comments, under the floorNo games
Jun 29 · no commentsNo games
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun
worst week best week · hover or tap a week for its games.
4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.
Games
The room talked about TJ McConnell in 0 of his 57 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.
—In winstoo few graded wins
—In lossestoo few graded losses
+17His season20% neg · 38% pos · 392 comments
The room never reached 20 comments about TJ McConnell in one of his games.
