Rob Dillingham · Court Sentiment

Verdict

42.0%46.3%11.7%

42.0%Negative298 comments

46.3%Neutral328 comments

11.7%Positive83 comments

−30Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=709 comments about Rob DillinghamUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Rob Dillingham, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Dillingham is looking like a fucking bust
Post · “You just blew two calls. You f*cking know it” - Chris Finch▲ 58Dec 18, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.MIN flair
Dillingham is a 100% negative asset and Miller has never gotten minutes outside the G league. Chicago turned two assets into two fliers and 4 second round picks. Genuinely wtf? I would riot as a Bulls fan.
Post · [Charania] The Chicago Bulls have traded Ayo Dosunmu to the Minnesota Timberwolves, sources tell ESPN.▲ 24Feb 5, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.MIN flair
Not to mention we can all stop vomiting when rob dillingham steps foot on the court
Post · Ayo ‘traded for no firsts’ Dosunmu in the win: 25/3/9 on 10/15 FG▲ 24Apr 24, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Rob Dillingham that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Rob Dillingham, his own Bulls fans are 41% negative, rival fans 40%, unflaired commenters 47%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

41.2%Own fansCHI flair · 34 comments

40.4%Rival fansevery other flair · 507 comments

47.0%Unflairedno flair · 168 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Rob Dillingham are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Rob Dillingham was talked about most on the front page: 260 of his 709 comments, −24 net sentiment against −30 across his season. His harshest room was news posts, −41 on 30% of his comments; his warmest the front page.

Front page37% of his commentsWarmest35.411.2260

News30% of his commentsHarshest46.55.6213

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Rob Dillingham; left out here: Game threads (114), Post-game threads (62), Highlights (48), Lowlights (7), Discussion posts (4), Daily chat thread (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Rob Dillingham ran between 24% and 54%. His worst week was the week of Dec 8, 50% negative of 40 comments; his best the week of Dec 15, 27% positive. 33 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 3 comments, under the floor
- W @ DEN 126–116
Oct 6 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L vs IND 134–135
- L @ NYK 95–100
Oct 13 · 5 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHI 120–126
- L @ PHI 110–126
Oct 20 · 43% negative · 3% positive · 30 comments
- L @ LAL 110–128
Oct 27 · 14 comments, under the floor
- L vs DEN 114–127
- L vs LAL 115–116
- W @ CHA 122–105
Nov 3 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 125–109
- L @ NYK 114–137
- W vs UTA 137–97
- W @ SAC 144–117
Nov 10 · 8 comments, under the floor
- W @ UTA 120–113
- W vs SAC 124–110
- L vs DEN 112–123
Nov 17 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W vs DAL 120–96
- W vs WAS 120–109
- L @ PHX 113–114
Nov 24 · 41% negative · 13% positive · 46 comments
- L @ SAC 112–117
- L @ OKC 105–113
- W vs BOS 119–115
- W vs SAS 125–112
Dec 1 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W @ NOP 149–142
- W @ NOP 125–116
- W vs LAC 109–106
Dec 8 · 50% negative · 8% positive · 40 comments
- W @ GSW 127–120
- W vs SAC 117–103
Dec 15 · 36% negative · 27% positive · 33 comments
- L vs MEM 110–116
- W vs OKC 112–107
Dec 22 · 8 comments, under the floor
- L vs BKN 107–123
Dec 29 · 6 comments, under the floor
- W @ CHI 136–101
- L @ ATL 102–126
- W @ WAS 141–115
Jan 5 · 18 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIA 122–94
- L @ CLE 134–146
Jan 12 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIL 139–106
Jan 19 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L vs GSW 85–111
Jan 26 · 16 comments, under the floor
- W vs GSW 108–83
- W vs OKC 123–111
Feb 2 · 45% negative · 6% positive · 118 comments
- L vs DEN 120–136
Feb 9 · 9 comments, under the floor
- L @ BKN 115–123
- L @ BOS 105–124
Feb 16 · 5 comments, under the floor
- L vs TOR 101–110
- L vs DET 110–126
- L vs NYK 99–105
Feb 23 · 9 comments, under the floor
- L vs CHA 99–131
- L vs POR 112–121
- W vs MIL 120–97
Mar 2 · 14 comments, under the floor
- L vs OKC 108–116
- W @ PHX 105–103
- L @ SAC 110–126
Mar 9 · 20 comments, under the floor
- W @ GSW 130–124
- L @ LAL 130–142
- L @ LAC 108–119
Mar 16 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 132–107
- L vs TOR 109–139
- L vs CLE 110–115
Mar 23 · 12 comments, under the floor
- W vs HOU 132–124
- L @ PHI 137–157
- L @ OKC 113–131
- L @ MEM 124–125
Mar 30 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L @ SAS 114–129
- L vs IND 126–145
- L @ NYK 96–136
- L vs PHX 110–120
Apr 6 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W @ WAS 129–98
- W @ WAS 119–108
- L vs ORL 103–127
- L @ DAL 128–149

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Rob Dillingham in 0 of his 70 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

—In winstoo few graded wins

—In lossestoo few graded losses

−30His season42% neg · 12% pos · 709 comments

The room never reached 20 comments about Rob Dillingham in one of his games.