Court Sentiment
Menu

2025-26

Lu Dort

OKC · G · #5

r/NBA's 2nd most hated player.

PPG
8.3
RPG
3.6
APG
1.2
GP
69
Height
6′4″
Weight
220 lb
Age
27
Born
Apr 19, 1999
Experience
6 yrs
From
Arizona State

Verdict

53.2%Negative10,507 comments
31.5%Neutral6,215 comments
15.3%Positive3,023 comments
−38Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=19,745 comments about Lu Dort

  1. 2most hated
  2. 64most loved
  3. 20most discussed
  4. 10most argued about

Receipts

What the room said about Lu Dort, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

  1. Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
    Lou Dort tries to hurt people. Over and over. The league does nothing, so, somebody needs to solve that problem.
    Post · [Highlight] Luguentz Dort sticks his hip out to make contact with Nikola Jokić, who responds; Jalen Williams steps in and squares off with Jokic.▲ 4,576Feb 28, 2026Source ↗
  2. Exhibit 02Negative.IND flair
    And thunder fans wonder why everyone hates their team. Fuck Lu Dort.
    Post · [Highlight] Lu Dort with the questionable play at Victor Wembanyama's knee▲ 4,086Dec 25, 2025Source ↗
  3. Exhibit 03Negative.SAC flair
    Dort such a little pussy he never confronts the person he tried to hurt. He always runs away, ignore, look to the refs. A real ass bitch 
    Post · Nikola Jokic on the Lu Dort flagrant foul: "Unnecessary move, and a necessary reaction. There is no such thing — I think there's not supposed to be those things on a basketball floor. So it was just an unnecessary move and a necessary reaction by me."▲ 2,079Feb 28, 2026Source ↗
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Lu Dort that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Lu Dort, his own Thunder fans are 34% negative, rival fans 58%, unflaired commenters 57%. Among the 15 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Pacers fans are hardest on him at 69% negative and Thunder fans kindest at 21% positive.

33.8%Own fansOKC flair · 3,504 comments
57.8%Rival fansevery other flair · 8,883 comments
56.9%Unflairedno flair · 7,358 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Lu Dort are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Lu Dort was talked about most in the game threads: 6,039 of his 19,745 comments, −35 net sentiment against −38 across his season. His harshest room was highlights, −45 on 23% of his comments; his warmest the post-game threads, −27 on 3% of his comments.

Game threads53.018.46,039
Post-game threadsWarmest46.619.6626
Daily chat thread54.516.3374
Front page52.314.15,728
HighlightsHarshest58.713.24,519
News43.012.31,478
Lowlights49.017.0300
Injury posts56.513.0639
Method
A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Lu Dort; left out here: Discussion posts (40). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Lu Dort ran between 28% and 67%. His worst week was the week of Feb 23, 70% negative of 2,944 comments; his best the week of Nov 17, 37% positive. 2 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.
Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Lu Dort in 44 of his 87 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −42 in losses (57% negative, 15% positive) against −32 in wins (52% negative, 20% positive), on a season net sentiment of −38.

−32In wins52% neg · 20% pos · 3,590 comments
−42In losses57% neg · 15% pos · 2,297 comments
−38His season53% neg · 15% pos · 19,745 comments
Games the room talked about Lu Dort in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
DatePhaseOppResultMinPtsRebAstFG3PTOV+/−P/R/ACommentsVerdict
May 30R3 G7R3 G7vs SASL 103–111L 103–111163121-41-30-93/1/251,9444 points harsher than his season, from 532 comments.
May 28R3 G6R3 G6@ SASL 91–118L 91–118235102-111-91-95/1/021,5227 points harsher than his season, from 272 comments.
May 26R3 G5R3 G5vs SASW 127–114W 127–114187403-71-40-47/4/025,7488 points harsher than his season, from 206 comments.
May 24R3 G4R3 G4@ SASL 82–103L 82–103172401-20-11-162/4/020,9263 points harsher than his season, from 203 comments.
May 22R3 G3R3 G3@ SASW 123–108W 123–108230530-10-11-90/5/331,8436 points warmer than his season, from 340 comments.
May 20R3 G2R3 G2vs SASW 122–113W 122–113168333-41-21-108/3/335,4531 point harsher than his season, from 228 comments.
May 18R3 G1R3 G1vs SASL 115–122L 115–122225312-61-50-65/3/153,0033 points harsher than his season, from 337 comments.
May 11R2 G4R2 G4@ LALW 115–110W 115–110316202-62-50-16/2/013,01527 points warmer than his season, from 62 comments.
May 9R2 G3R2 G3@ LALW 131–108W 131–1082010304-52-20+2110/3/013,63449 points warmer than his season, from 90 comments.
May 7R2 G2R2 G2vs LALW 125–107W 125–107233121-61-62-13/1/221,80714 points warmer than his season, from 148 comments.

Bad nights get punished, mildly: across 44 games the room talked about, net sentiment drifts up as Lu Dort's Game Score rises.

−75−50−250+25+50+75-1001020his season −38W vs HOU 125–124: Game Score 2.9, net sentiment −39 from 386 commentsW @ IND 141–135: Game Score 5.4, net sentiment −51 from 187 commentsW vs MIN 113–105: Game Score -0.0, net sentiment −24 from 68 commentsW vs PHX 138–89: Game Score 9.1, net sentiment +25 from 40 commentsL vs SAS 109–111: Game Score 0.3, net sentiment −5 from 103 commentsW vs LAC 122–101: Game Score -4.6, net sentiment −19 from 26 commentsL @ MIN 107–112: Game Score 4.1, net sentiment −49 from 144 commentsL @ SAS 110–130: Game Score 9.4, net sentiment −49 from 216 commentsL vs SAS 102–117: Game Score 6.5, net sentiment −45 from 235 commentsL @ PHX 105–108: Game Score 5.1, net sentiment −49 from 41 commentsW @ HOU 111–91: Game Score 8.5, net sentiment +10 from 21 commentsW @ CLE 136–104: Game Score 17.9, net sentiment +20 from 20 commentsL vs IND 114–117: Game Score -3.7, net sentiment −40 from 40 commentsL vs TOR 101–103: Game Score 18.0, net sentiment −23 from 22 commentsW vs NOP 104–95: Game Score 10.1, net sentiment −25 from 28 commentsL @ MIN 111–123: Game Score 3.1, net sentiment −56 from 50 commentsW @ DEN 121–111: Game Score 0.6, net sentiment −23 from 56 commentsW vs CLE 121–113: Game Score 6.6, net sentiment −21 from 33 commentsW @ TOR 116–107: Game Score 8.6, net sentiment −33 from 30 commentsW vs DEN 127–121: Game Score 5.2, net sentiment −58 from 502 commentsW @ NYK 103–100: Game Score 7.4, net sentiment −33 from 64 commentsW vs DEN 129–126: Game Score -1.1, net sentiment −50 from 252 commentsW vs BOS 104–102: Game Score 2.5, net sentiment −36 from 96 commentsW vs MIN 116–103: Game Score 0.8, net sentiment −4 from 25 commentsW @ ORL 113–108: Game Score 1.5, net sentiment −39 from 31 commentsL @ BOS 109–119: Game Score 8.5, net sentiment −40 from 45 commentsW vs NYK 111–100: Game Score 12.4, net sentiment −50 from 64 commentsW vs LAL 139–96: Game Score 11.7, net sentiment +19 from 181 commentsL @ DEN 107–127: Game Score 2.1, net sentiment −32 from 57 commentsW vs PHX 119–84: Game Score 5.8, net sentiment 0 from 66 commentsW vs PHX 120–107: Game Score 5.4, net sentiment +6 from 66 commentsW @ PHX 121–109: Game Score 8.1, net sentiment −26 from 139 commentsW @ PHX 131–122: Game Score -1.4, net sentiment 0 from 24 commentsW vs LAL 108–90: Game Score 4.6, net sentiment −33 from 111 commentsW vs LAL 125–107: Game Score -0.9, net sentiment −24 from 148 commentsW @ LAL 131–108: Game Score 8.8, net sentiment +11 from 90 commentsW @ LAL 115–110: Game Score 2.0, net sentiment −11 from 62 commentsL vs SAS 115–122: Game Score 2.0, net sentiment −41 from 337 commentsW vs SAS 122–113: Game Score 8.0, net sentiment −39 from 228 commentsW @ SAS 123–108: Game Score 1.5, net sentiment −32 from 340 commentsL @ SAS 82–103: Game Score 2.0, net sentiment −41 from 203 commentsW vs SAS 127–114: Game Score 4.5, net sentiment −46 from 206 commentsL @ SAS 91–118: Game Score -1.7, net sentiment −45 from 272 commentsL vs SAS 103–111: Game Score 1.5, net sentiment −42 from 532 comments
r = 0.26 · 44 games · win loss