2025-26

Keldon Johnson

SAS · F-G · #3

Unofficial: 3,817 comments, 1,183 short of the official minimum of 5,000. Among all 223 tracked players he would rank 1st most argued about.

PPG: 13.1
RPG: 5.3
APG: 1.3
GP: 83

Height: 6′6″
Weight: 220 lb
Age: 27
Born: Oct 11, 1999
Experience: 6 yrs
From: Kentucky

Verdict

47.0%25.5%27.5%

47.0%Negative1,794 comments

25.5%Neutral975 comments

27.5%Positive1,048 comments

−20Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=3,817 comments about Keldon JohnsonUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Keldon Johnson, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.SAS flair
The audacity for Keldon to complain about it was even more ridiculous. He’s been so bad this entire postseason
Post · Stephon Castle on the OKC defense: "I'm trying to play through it, it's tough. The way they guard, how physical they are we don't get that same luxury to play as physical on the other end."▲ 222May 27, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.SAS flair
At least he's a rookie. Keldon has no justification for his disgusting performances.
Post · De'Aaron Fox: "We lost Game 3... but that was the first time he [Gregg Popovich] walked into the locker room and was like "Nah, that's BS.. that's not how we play basketball" and obviously he had some choice words for us..."▲ 82May 25, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.LAL flair
Carter's super young so him being too amped up and stupid is forgiveable, but Keldon Johnson is a vet who has a gold medal. He shouldn't be this bad and dumb
Post-game thread · SAS 115 @ NYK 111 · R4 G3 · Jun 8▲ 33Jun 9, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Keldon Johnson that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Keldon Johnson, his own Spurs fans are 37% negative, rival fans 53%, unflaired commenters 49%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

37.2%Own fansSAS flair · 1,176 comments

52.8%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,518 comments

49.3%Unflairedno flair · 1,123 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Keldon Johnson are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Keldon Johnson was talked about most in the game threads: 2,337 of his 3,817 comments, −34 net sentiment against −20 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads; his warmest the post-game threads, +23 on 5% of his comments. The game threads ran 33 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads61% of his commentsHarshest56.122.02,337

Post-game threads5% of his commentsWarmest23.446.8205

Front page20% of his comments34.133.0754

Highlights6% of his comments21.642.7218

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Keldon Johnson; left out here: Daily chat thread (154), News (130), Lowlights (12), Injury posts (4), Discussion posts (3). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Keldon Johnson ran between 12% and 67%. His worst week was the week of Jun 8, 69% negative of 850 comments; his best the week of Mar 23, 66% positive. 19 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 3 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIA 112–107
- W vs UTA 134–130
Oct 13 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W @ IND 124–108
- W vs IND 133–104
Oct 20 · 28 comments, under the floor
- W @ DAL 125–92
- W @ NOP 120–116
- W vs BKN 118–107
Oct 27 · 19% negative · 60% positive · 43 comments
- W vs TOR 121–103
- W vs MIA 107–101
- L @ PHX 118–130
Nov 3 · 12% negative · 60% positive · 60 comments
- L @ LAL 116–118
- W vs HOU 121–110
- W vs NOP 126–119
Nov 10 · 16 comments, under the floor
- W @ CHI 121–117
- L vs GSW 120–125
- L vs GSW 108–109
- W vs SAC 123–110
Nov 17 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 111–101
- W vs ATL 135–126
- L @ PHX 102–111
Nov 24 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W @ POR 115–102
- W @ DEN 139–136
- L @ MIN 112–125
Dec 1 · 9 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 126–119
- W @ ORL 114–112
- L @ CLE 117–130
Dec 8 · 16% negative · 41% positive · 80 comments
- W @ NOP 135–132
- W @ LAL 132–119
- W vs OKC 111–109
Dec 15 · 22 comments, under the floor
- L vs NYK 113–124
- W vs WAS 119–94
- W @ ATL 126–98
- W @ WAS 124–113
Dec 22 · 14% negative · 59% positive · 147 comments
- W vs OKC 130–110
- W @ OKC 117–102
- L vs UTA 114–127
Dec 29 · 10% negative · 56% positive · 39 comments
- L vs CLE 101–113
- W vs NYK 134–132
- W @ IND 123–113
- L vs POR 110–115
Jan 5 · 9% negative · 63% positive · 43 comments
- L @ MEM 105–106
- W vs LAL 107–91
- W @ BOS 100–95
- L @ MIN 103–104
Jan 12 · 33% negative · 38% positive · 48 comments
- L @ OKC 98–119
- W vs MIL 119–101
- W vs MIN 126–123
Jan 19 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W vs UTA 123–110
- L @ HOU 106–111
- W @ UTA 126–109
- L vs NOP 95–104
Jan 26 · 29 comments, under the floor
- W @ HOU 111–99
- L @ CHA 106–111
- W vs ORL 112–103
Feb 2 · 16 comments, under the floor
- W vs OKC 116–106
- W @ DAL 135–123
- W vs DAL 138–125
Feb 9 · 14% negative · 51% positive · 35 comments
- W @ LAL 136–108
- W @ GSW 126–113
Feb 16 · 17 comments, under the floor
- W vs PHX 121–94
- W vs SAC 139–122
Feb 23 · 28% negative · 30% positive · 60 comments
- W @ DET 114–103
- W @ TOR 110–107
- W @ BKN 126–110
- L @ NYK 89–114
Mar 2 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W @ PHI 131–91
- W vs DET 121–106
- W vs LAC 116–112
- W vs HOU 145–120
Mar 9 · 15% negative · 44% positive · 41 comments
- W vs BOS 125–116
- L vs DEN 131–136
- W vs CHA 115–102
Mar 16 · 25 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAC 119–115
- W @ SAC 132–104
- W vs PHX 101–100
- W vs IND 134–119
Mar 23 · 15% negative · 66% positive · 41 comments
- W @ MIA 136–111
- W @ MEM 123–98
- W @ MIL 127–95
Mar 30 · 34% negative · 40% positive · 35 comments
- W vs CHI 129–114
- W @ GSW 127–113
- W @ LAC 118–99
- L @ DEN 134–136
Apr 6 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W vs PHI 115–102
- W vs POR 112–101
- W vs DAL 139–120
- L vs DEN 118–128
Apr 13 · 22 comments, under the floor
- W vs POR 111–98
Apr 20 · 12% negative · 42% positive · 130 comments
- L vs POR 103–106
- W @ POR 120–108
- W @ POR 114–93
Apr 27 · 18% negative · 39% positive · 38 comments
- W vs POR 114–95
May 4 · 49% negative · 26% positive · 149 comments
- L vs MIN 102–104
- W vs MIN 133–95
- W @ MIN 115–108
- L @ MIN 109–114
May 11 · 36% negative · 30% positive · 203 comments
- W vs MIN 126–97
- W @ MIN 139–109
May 18 · 65% negative · 13% positive · 438 comments
- W @ OKC 122–115
- L @ OKC 113–122
- L vs OKC 108–123
- W vs OKC 103–82
May 25 · 54% negative · 26% positive · 825 comments
- L @ OKC 114–127
- W vs OKC 118–91
- W @ OKC 111–103
Jun 1 · 64% negative · 17% positive · 193 comments
- L vs NYK 95–105
- L vs NYK 104–105
Jun 8 · 69% negative · 11% positive · 850 comments
- W @ NYK 115–111
- L @ NYK 106–107
- L vs NYK 90–94

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Keldon Johnson in 26 of his 110 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −50 in losses (65% negative, 16% positive) against −27 in wins (52% negative, 25% positive), on a season net sentiment of −20.

−27In wins52% neg · 25% pos · 1,429 comments

−50In losses65% neg · 16% pos · 836 comments

−20His season47% neg · 27% pos · 3,817 comments

Games the room talked about Keldon Johnson in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Jun 13R4 G5	R4 G5	vs NYKL 90–94	L 90–94	16	7	5	0	2-5	2-3	0	+17	7/5/0	56,307	32 points harsher than his season, from 98 comments.
Jun 10R4 G4	R4 G4	@ NYKL 106–107	L 106–107	18	2	4	1	1-5	0-1	0	-1	2/4/1	73,619	38 points harsher than his season, from 146 comments.
Jun 8R4 G3	R4 G3	@ NYKW 115–111	W 115–111	17	7	2	0	3-5	0-0	2	+14	7/2/0	59,290	43 points harsher than his season, from 465 comments.
Jun 5R4 G2	R4 G2	vs NYKL 104–105	L 104–105	16	3	4	2	1-4	0-2	1	-5	3/4/2	54,897	38 points harsher than his season, from 82 comments.
Jun 3R4 G1	R4 G1	vs NYKL 95–105	L 95–105	8	3	0	0	1-4	1-2	0	+1	3/0/0	45,156	52 points harsher than his season, from 42 comments.
May 30R3 G7	R3 G7	@ OKCW 111–103	W 111–103	16	11	3	1	4-8	2-5	0	+6	11/3/1	51,944	23 points warmer than his season, from 204 comments.
May 28R3 G6	R3 G6	vs OKCW 118–91	W 118–91	18	9	3	0	4-7	1-3	1	+7	9/3/0	21,522	22 points harsher than his season, from 36 comments.
May 26R3 G5	R3 G5	@ OKCL 114–127	L 114–127	20	15	4	2	7-13	1-4	2	+3	15/4/2	25,748	9 points warmer than his season, from 106 comments.
May 24R3 G4	R3 G4	vs OKCW 103–82	W 103–82	18	6	3	0	3-12	0-4	2	+7	6/3/0	20,926	46 points harsher than his season, from 275 comments.
May 22R3 G3	R3 G3	vs OKCL 108–123	L 108–123	12	5	2	0	1-5	1-4	1	-23	5/2/0	31,843	52 points harsher than his season, from 145 comments.

Bad nights get punished: across 26 games the room talked about, net sentiment rises with Keldon Johnson's Game Score.

r = 0.76 · 26 games · win loss