Jonathan Kuminga · Court Sentiment

Verdict

41.7%42.2%16.2%

41.7%Negative3,172 comments

42.2%Neutral3,208 comments

16.2%Positive1,229 comments

−26Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=7,609 comments about Jonathan Kuminga

Receipts

What the room said about Jonathan Kuminga, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.ATL flair
I want to take opportunity to apologize to Steve Kerr and the Warriors because good lord you guys were right. This dude STINKS. I really hope the Hawks don’t pick up Kuminga’s option this offseason. Spend the money elsewhere
Post · Jonathan "Lost faith in Steve Kerr" Kuminga continues to struggle and put up another stinker tonight in Boston for Quin Snyder: 18 mins, 3 points on 0/0/75 splits, -12.▲ 1,088Mar 28, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.ATL flair
“Kuminga is the nastiest skank b*tch I have ever met. Do not trust him, he is a fugly slut.”
Post · [Slater] On Dec. 10, Kuminga knew management wanted to ding him for missing a team event, and alert him that someone around him was taking too much food from the family room. The gripes had become "petty". Inside Kerr's office, the meeting ended with Kerr slamming his white board in frustration.▲ 359Feb 11, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.GSW flair
I’ve never seen a team so stubborn about a mid ass player, like I’m genuinely so fucking tired of it. This season is a loss, playing Kuminga more won’t increase his value, as he will never develop here. Just get fucking anything for “potential man” at this point, like fucking hell.
Post · [Stein] Golden State’s “preferable” option now is likely to play Jonathan Kuminga for the rest of the season, have him recoup his value, and then attempt to trade him again in the offseason.▲ 240Jan 20, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Jonathan Kuminga that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Jonathan Kuminga, his own Hawks fans are 28% negative, rival fans 42%, unflaired commenters 42%. Among the 3 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Lakers fans are hardest on him at 41% negative and Hawks fans kindest at 33% positive.

27.6%Own fansATL flair · 210 comments

42.0%Rival fansevery other flair · 4,213 comments

42.2%Unflairedno flair · 3,186 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Jonathan Kuminga are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Jonathan Kuminga was talked about most under news posts: 3,033 of his 7,609 comments, −34 net sentiment against −26 across his season. His harshest room was news posts; his warmest the post-game threads, −4 on 6% of his comments. The front page ran 19 points harsher than the game threads, the reverse of the usual order: his season was a story off the court.

Game threads13% of his comments40.631.8995

Post-game threads6% of his commentsWarmest36.832.4438

Front page34% of his comments42.314.42,553

Highlights5% of his comments34.226.2401

News40% of his commentsHarshest43.19.23,033

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Jonathan Kuminga; left out here: Lowlights (99), Injury posts (37), Daily chat thread (11), Discussion posts (8). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Jonathan Kuminga ran between 21% and 50%. His worst week was the week of Apr 27, 54% negative of 238 comments; his best the week of Oct 27, 46% positive. 5 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 29% negative · 10% positive · 99 comments
- W vs LAL 111–103
Oct 6 · 33% negative · 14% positive · 121 comments
- W vs POR 129–123
- L @ LAL 116–126
Oct 13 · 34% negative · 15% positive · 85 comments
- W @ POR 118–111
Oct 20 · 26% negative · 42% positive · 307 comments
- W @ LAL 119–109
- W vs DEN 137–131
- L @ POR 119–139
Oct 27 · 20% negative · 46% positive · 158 comments
- W vs MEM 131–118
- W vs LAC 98–79
- L @ MIL 110–120
- L @ IND 109–114
Nov 3 · 35% negative · 21% positive · 43 comments
- W vs PHX 118–107
- L @ SAC 116–121
- L @ DEN 104–129
- W vs IND 114–83
Nov 10 · 42% negative · 11% positive · 97 comments
- L @ OKC 102–126
- W @ SAS 125–120
Nov 24 · 46% negative · 9% positive · 285 comments
- W vs NOP 104–96
Dec 1 · 49% negative · 11% positive · 176 comments
- L vs OKC 112–124
- L @ PHI 98–99
- W @ CLE 99–94
Dec 15 · 54% negative · 5% positive · 153 comments
- L @ PHX 98–99
Jan 19 · 49% negative · 9% positive · 961 comments
- L vs TOR 127–145
- L @ DAL 115–123
Feb 23 · 37% negative · 26% positive · 194 comments
- W vs WAS 119–98
- W vs WAS 126–96
- W vs POR 135–101
Mar 9 · 53% negative · 13% positive · 53 comments
- W vs BKN 108–97
Mar 16 · 42% negative · 19% positive · 146 comments
- W vs ORL 124–112
- W @ DAL 135–120
- W vs GSW 126–110
Mar 23 · 53% negative · 10% positive · 159 comments
- W vs MEM 146–107
- W @ DET 130–129
- L @ BOS 102–109
Mar 30 · 31% negative · 21% positive · 70 comments
- W vs BOS 112–102
- W @ ORL 130–101
- W @ BKN 141–107
Apr 6 · 52% negative · 15% positive · 60 comments
- L vs NYK 105–108
- L @ CLE 116–122
- W vs CLE 124–102
Apr 13 · 53% negative · 14% positive · 144 comments
- L @ NYK 102–113
Apr 20 · 31% negative · 41% positive · 713 comments
- W @ NYK 107–106
- W vs NYK 109–108
- L vs NYK 98–114
Apr 27 · 54% negative · 13% positive · 238 comments
- L @ NYK 97–126
- L vs NYK 89–140

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Jonathan Kuminga in 12 of his 46 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −47 in losses (61% negative, 15% positive) against +26 in wins (25% negative, 51% positive), on a season net sentiment of −26.

+26In wins25% neg · 51% pos · 644 comments

−47In losses61% neg · 15% pos · 296 comments

−26His season42% neg · 16% pos · 7,609 comments

Games the room talked about Jonathan Kuminga in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 30R1 G6	R1 G6	vs NYKL 89–140	L 89–140	23	11	2	3	3-7	1-3	1	-44	11/2/3	9,211	26 points harsher than his season, from 47 comments.
Apr 28R1 G5	R1 G5	@ NYKL 97–126	L 97–126	17	13	4	1	4-10	1-5	1	-11	13/4/1	2,669	25 points harsher than his season, from 69 comments.
Apr 25R1 G4	R1 G4	vs NYKL 98–114	L 98–114	25	10	2	0	3-10	0-6	2	-7	10/2/0	2,501	21 points harsher than his season, from 43 comments.
Apr 23R1 G3	R1 G3	vs NYKW 109–108	W 109–108	28	21	4	0	9-14	2-4	1	+3	21/4/0	6,607	53 points warmer than his season, from 265 comments.
Apr 20R1 G2	R1 G2	@ NYKW 107–106	W 107–106	35	19	4	1	7-12	1-4	1	+10	19/4/1	5,421	40 points warmer than his season, from 114 comments.
Apr 18R1 G1	R1 G1	@ NYKL 102–113	L 102–113	27	8	4	1	3-7	0-2	0	-7	8/4/1	4,288	12 points harsher than his season, from 69 comments.
Jan 22		@ DALL 115–123	L 115–123	9	10	1	2	3-3	0-0	0	+18	10/1/2	541	14 points warmer than his season, from 26 comments.
Dec 2		vs OKCL 112–124	L 112–124	16	8	7	1	3-10	1-3	2	+3	8/7/1	2,438	46 points harsher than his season, from 42 comments.
Oct 28		vs LACW 98–79	W 98–79	26	9	5	1	4-11	1-2	2	+9	9/5/1	1,410	79 points warmer than his season, from 30 comments.
Oct 27		vs MEMW 131–118	W 131–118	32	25	10	4	9-14	0-2	3	+15	25/10/4	416	72 points warmer than his season, from 30 comments.