Court Sentiment
Menu

2025-26

Jayson Tatum

BOS · F-G · #0

r/NBA's 23rd most discussed player.

PPG
21.8
RPG
10.0
APG
5.3
GP
16
Height
6′8″
Weight
210 lb
Age
28
Born
Mar 3, 1998
Experience
8 yrs
From
Duke

Verdict

32.4%Negative6,012 comments
43.8%Neutral8,118 comments
23.8%Positive4,406 comments
−9Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=18,536 comments about Jayson Tatum

  1. 53most hated
  2. 29most loved
  3. 23most discussed
  4. 58most argued about

Receipts

What the room said about Jayson Tatum, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

  1. Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
    It’s that simple. Tatum was bricking everything and KD, and LeBron who Tatum would replace were better than him
    Post · [Jayson Tatum] on DNPs in the Olympics: “People didn’t take into account how I was feeling in real time — I couldn’t understand it, because I was 1st Team All-NBA. Me and 4 other guys, and they were all European. I’m the only American. Then in the Olympics I didn’t play… It was hard to process.”▲ 1,292Jan 29, 2026Source ↗
  2. Exhibit 02Negative.IND flair
    Tatum made ZERO shots in the Olympics outside 2 feet. He was straight fucking dog ass.
    Post · [Jayson Tatum] on DNPs in the Olympics: “People didn’t take into account how I was feeling in real time — I couldn’t understand it, because I was 1st Team All-NBA. Me and 4 other guys, and they were all European. I’m the only American. Then in the Olympics I didn’t play… It was hard to process.”▲ 242Jan 29, 2026Source ↗
  3. Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
    Reminds me of a brain damaged Jayson Tatum
    Post · Jonathan Kuminga in the win: 21/4 on 9/13 FG▲ 211Apr 24, 2026Source ↗
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Jayson Tatum that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Jayson Tatum, his own Celtics fans are 24% negative, rival fans 36%, unflaired commenters 35%. Among the 14 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Heat fans are hardest on him at 47% negative and Celtics fans kindest at 32% positive.

23.9%Own fansBOS flair · 4,625 comments
35.7%Rival fansevery other flair · 7,115 comments
34.8%Unflairedno flair · 6,796 comments
Method
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Jayson Tatum are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Jayson Tatum was talked about most on the front page: 9,604 of his 18,536 comments, −8 net sentiment against −9 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads, −14 on 13% of his comments; his warmest the post-game threads, +5 on 6% of his comments. The game threads ran 6 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threadsHarshest39.525.22,422
Post-game threadsWarmest26.431.21,070
Front page31.423.69,604
Highlights30.728.21,534
News32.619.53,706
Method
A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Jayson Tatum; left out here: Discussion posts (56), Lowlights (49), Daily chat thread (45), Injury posts (35). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Jayson Tatum ran between 22% and 42%. His worst week was the week of May 4, 43% negative of 767 comments; his best the week of Mar 30, 35% positive.

4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.
Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Jayson Tatum in 15 of his 22 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −29 in losses (47% negative, 18% positive) against +13 in wins (28% negative, 41% positive), on a season net sentiment of −9.

+13In wins28% neg · 41% pos · 1,117 comments
−29In losses47% neg · 18% pos · 622 comments
−9His season32% neg · 24% pos · 18,536 comments
Games the room talked about Jayson Tatum in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
DatePhaseOppResultMinPtsRebAstFG3PTOV+/−P/R/ACommentsVerdict
Apr 30R1 G6R1 G6@ PHIL 93–106L 93–10629171136-132-63-1117/11/35,66624 points harsher than his season, from 202 comments.
Apr 28R1 G5R1 G5vs PHIL 97–113L 97–11341241648-194-124-924/16/43,32940 points harsher than his season, from 105 comments.
Apr 26R1 G4R1 G4@ PHIW 128–96W 128–9635307118-165-105+2530/7/114,65812 points warmer than his season, from 166 comments.
Apr 24R1 G3R1 G3@ PHIW 108–100W 108–1004225579-175-91+225/5/75,04812 points warmer than his season, from 267 comments.
Apr 21R1 G2R1 G2vs PHIL 97–111L 97–11139191498-192-83+119/14/93,86821 points harsher than his season, from 99 comments.
Apr 19R1 G1R1 G1vs PHIW 123–91W 123–9132251179-171-71+2025/11/72,72937 points warmer than his season, from 139 comments.
Apr 9@ NYKL 106–112L 106–11240241387-222-106-1624/13/81,33815 points harsher than his season, from 82 comments.
Apr 7vs CHAW 113–102W 113–1023923548-153-72+1223/5/41,15412 points harsher than his season, from 54 comments.
Apr 1@ MIAW 147–129W 147–129372518119-214-132+725/18/1134543 points warmer than his season, from 32 comments.
Mar 29@ CHAW 114–99W 114–9931325812-235-100+1532/5/823250 points warmer than his season, from 34 comments.

Bad nights get punished: across 15 games the room talked about, net sentiment rises with Jayson Tatum's Game Score.

−50−250+25+500102030his season −9W vs DAL 120–100: Game Score 13.3, net sentiment +10 from 238 commentsW @ CLE 109–98: Game Score 12.1, net sentiment +22 from 86 commentsL @ SAS 116–125: Game Score 14.7, net sentiment 0 from 104 commentsL vs MIN 92–102: Game Score 12.9, net sentiment −43 from 30 commentsW vs OKC 119–109: Game Score 19.0, net sentiment +30 from 101 commentsW @ CHA 114–99: Game Score 26.9, net sentiment +41 from 34 commentsW @ MIA 147–129: Game Score 25.8, net sentiment +34 from 32 commentsW vs CHA 113–102: Game Score 17.4, net sentiment −20 from 54 commentsL @ NYK 106–112: Game Score 15.8, net sentiment −23 from 82 commentsW vs PHI 123–91: Game Score 25.5, net sentiment +29 from 139 commentsL vs PHI 97–111: Game Score 16.2, net sentiment −29 from 99 commentsW @ PHI 108–100: Game Score 22.3, net sentiment +4 from 267 commentsW @ PHI 128–96: Game Score 25.6, net sentiment +3 from 166 commentsL vs PHI 97–113: Game Score 20.5, net sentiment −49 from 105 commentsL @ PHI 93–106: Game Score 11.5, net sentiment −33 from 202 comments
r = 0.52 · 15 games · win loss