Daniel Gafford · Court Sentiment

Verdict

27.7%51.3%21.0%

27.7%Negative182 comments

51.3%Neutral337 comments

21.0%Positive138 comments

−7Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=657 comments about Daniel GaffordUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Daniel Gafford, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.MIL flair
Gafford was ass all game. Refs were giving Giannis one out of three fouls he deserved and Gafford still was helpless and in foul trouble.
Post · [Highlight] Gafford brings Giannis to the ground with a minute left in the game. Common foul called.▲ 15Nov 11, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.GSW flair
So turns out Daniel Gafford is also a fucking moron
Post · Daniel Gafford’s shirt said ‘faith isn’t for the weak’: “Faith isn’t for the weak because god gives his tests to his strongest soldiers. Most definitely, and I really can’t go deep into that, with the stuff that’s going on with the Ivey situation…”▲ 3Mar 31, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
Gafford sucks so f'n bad
Game thread · DAL 116 @ GSW 126 · Dec 25▲ 2Dec 26, 2025Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Daniel Gafford that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Daniel Gafford, his own Mavericks fans are 22% negative, rival fans 26%, unflaired commenters 32%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

22.3%Own fansDAL flair · 112 comments

26.1%Rival fansevery other flair · 307 comments

32.4%Unflairedno flair · 238 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Daniel Gafford are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Daniel Gafford was talked about most under news posts: 253 of his 657 comments, −9 net sentiment against −7 across his season. His harshest room was news posts; his warmest the front page, −5 on 37% of his comments.

Front page37% of his commentsWarmest25.220.3246

News39% of his commentsHarshest25.316.6253

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Daniel Gafford; left out here: Game threads (76), Highlights (48), Post-game threads (25), Injury posts (7), Lowlights (2). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Daniel Gafford ran between 20% and 43%. His worst week was the week of Mar 30, 45% negative of 33 comments; his best the week of Mar 30, 27% positive. 35 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 27 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L vs DET 110–122
Nov 3 · 26 comments, under the floor
- L @ HOU 102–110
- L vs NOP 99–101
- L @ MEM 104–118
- W @ WAS 111–105
Nov 10 · 29% negative · 13% positive · 63 comments
- L vs MIL 114–116
- L vs PHX 114–123
- L vs LAC 127–133
- W vs POR 138–133
Nov 17 · 25 comments, under the floor
- L vs NYK 111–113
- W vs NOP 118–115
- L vs MEM 96–102
Nov 24 · 23 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIA 102–106
- L @ LAL 119–129
Dec 1 · 15 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIA 118–108
Dec 15 · 27 comments, under the floor
- L @ UTA 133–140
- W vs DET 116–114
- L @ PHI 114–121
Dec 22 · 29 comments, under the floor
- L @ NOP 113–119
- W vs DEN 131–130
- L @ GSW 116–126
- L @ SAC 107–113
Dec 29 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L @ POR 122–125
- L vs PHI 108–123
- W vs HOU 110–104
Jan 5 · 10 comments, under the floor
- W @ SAC 100–98
- L @ UTA 114–116
- L @ CHI 107–125
Jan 12 · 24 comments, under the floor
- L vs DEN 109–118
Jan 19 · 18 comments, under the floor
- L vs LAL 110–116
Jan 26 · 18 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIN 105–118
- L vs CHA 121–123
- L @ HOU 107–111
Feb 2 · 23% negative · 23% positive · 64 comments
- L vs BOS 100–110
- L vs SAS 123–135
- L @ SAS 125–138
Feb 9 · 7 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHX 111–120
- L @ LAL 104–124
Feb 16 · 13 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIN 111–122
- W @ IND 134–130
Feb 23 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 123–114
- L vs MEM 105–124
- L vs OKC 87–100
Mar 2 · 5 comments, under the floor
- L @ CHA 90–117
- L @ ORL 114–115
- L @ TOR 92–122
Mar 9 · 1 comments, under the floor
- L @ ATL 112–124
- W @ MEM 120–112
Mar 16 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L vs ATL 120–135
- L vs LAC 131–138
Mar 23 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L vs GSW 131–137
Mar 30 · 45% negative · 27% positive · 33 comments
- L vs MIN 94–124
- L @ MIL 99–123
- L vs ORL 127–138
- W vs LAL 134–128

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Daniel Gafford in 0 of his 55 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

—In winstoo few graded wins

—In lossestoo few graded losses

−7His season28% neg · 21% pos · 657 comments

The room never reached 20 comments about Daniel Gafford in one of his games.