What the room said about Christian Braun, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.
Exhibit 01Negative.MIN flair
Braun is a criminal
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
Braun got paid (undeserved) and turned into a complete lemon. Fairs
Exhibit 03Negative.BOS flair
Christian Braun is a huge bitch I just want that known
Method
A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Christian Braun that cleared the classifier's confidence bar
and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.
Fans
Of what r/NBA says about Christian Braun, his own Nuggets fans are 37% negative, rival fans 52%, unflaired commenters 50%. Among the 2 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Timberwolves fans are hardest on him at 64% negative and Nuggets fans kindest at 19% positive.
A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Christian Braun are left out of the lists;
the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Rooms
Christian Braun was talked about most in the game threads: 1,033 of his 2,831 comments, −46 net sentiment against −35 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads; his warmest news posts, −19 on 20% of his comments. The game threads ran 12 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.
% neg% posn
Game threads36% of his commentsHarshest58.012.31,033
Front page31% of his comments46.612.9887
News20% of his commentsWarmest37.819.0563
Method
A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Christian Braun; left out here: Highlights (178), Post-game threads (157), Daily chat thread (7), Lowlights (3), Discussion posts (1), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.
Timeline
Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Christian Braun ran between 18% and 64%. His worst week was the week of Apr 27, 68% negative of 675 comments; his best the week of Oct 6, 37% positive. 16 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.
May 4 · 53% negative · 7% positive · 177 commentsNo games
May 11 · 20 comments, under the floorNo games
May 18 · 14 comments, under the floorNo games
May 25 · 44% negative · 5% positive · 39 commentsNo games
Jun 1 · 35% negative · 18% positive · 40 commentsNo games
Jun 8 · 35% negative · 7% positive · 43 commentsNo games
Jun 15 · 40% negative · 10% positive · 30 commentsNo games
Jun 22 · 45% negative · 11% positive · 44 commentsNo games
Jun 29 · 13 comments, under the floorNo games
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun
worst week best week · hover or tap a week for its games.
4-week rolling rates from summed counts; weeks under 30 comments are left off the lines.Method
Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.
Games
The room talked about Christian Braun in 12 of his 54 games, at least 20 comments each. It was harsher after losses: net sentiment −53 in losses (63% negative, 11% positive) against −46 in wins (60% negative, 13% positive), on a season net sentiment of −35.
−46In wins60% neg · 13% pos · 163 comments
−53In losses63% neg · 11% pos · 737 comments
−35His season49% neg · 14% pos · 2,831 comments
Games the room talked about Christian Braun in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date
Phase
Opp
Result
Min
Pts
Reb
Ast
FG
3P
TOV
+/−
P/R/A
Comments
Verdict
Apr 30R1 G6
R1 G6
@ MINL 98–110
L 98–110
28
3
1
0
1-4
1-4
1
-9
3/1/0
18,335
−34n=22634 points harsher than his season, from 226 comments.
Apr 27R1 G5
R1 G5
vs MINW 125–113
W 125–113
31
9
2
3
3-5
1-2
1
+18
9/2/3
7,427
−22n=9322 points harsher than his season, from 93 comments.
Apr 25R1 G4
R1 G4
@ MINL 96–112
L 96–112
34
8
5
1
2-4
1-1
2
-9
8/5/1
13,778
−31n=13231 points harsher than his season, from 132 comments.
Apr 23R1 G3
R1 G3
@ MINL 96–113
L 96–113
24
2
2
0
0-4
0-1
0
-19
2/2/0
9,929
−42n=3942 points harsher than his season, from 39 comments.
Apr 20R1 G2
R1 G2
vs MINL 114–119
L 114–119
35
16
3
5
5-9
1-3
0
+4
16/3/5
12,235
+3n=1123 points warmer than his season, from 112 comments.
Apr 18R1 G1
R1 G1
vs MINW 116–105
W 116–105
36
12
8
1
4-10
2-3
0
0
12/8/1
10,584
−4n=364 points harsher than his season, from 36 comments.
Apr 4
vs SASW 136–134
W 136–134
39
21
8
4
7-16
5-11
0
+10
21/8/4
7,010
+11n=3411 points warmer than his season, from 34 comments.
Mar 9
@ OKCL 126–129
L 126–129
38
4
9
2
2-6
0-3
1
-2
4/9/2
5,884
−34n=4434 points harsher than his season, from 44 comments.
Feb 27
@ OKCL 121–127
L 121–127
45
23
8
2
8-18
3-10
3
+12
23/8/2
7,202
+26n=4426 points warmer than his season, from 44 comments.
Feb 4
@ NYKL 127–134
L 127–134
43
6
7
6
2-6
0-2
1
+4
6/7/6
2,669
+6n=676 points warmer than his season, from 67 comments.