Brandon Ingram · Court Sentiment

Verdict

41.7%37.0%21.4%

41.7%Negative1,717 comments

37.0%Neutral1,522 comments

21.4%Positive880 comments

−20Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=4,119 comments about Brandon IngramUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Brandon Ingram, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Remember that Lakers Rockets fight in 2018? It started because Ingram fouled Harden and aggressively shoved him because he didn't like the call. Then comes flying in throwing punches. Fuck Ingram. Classless piece of shit and overrated player.
Post · [Highlight] Brandon Ingram slams a water bottle on the floor, splashing floor cleaner, staff members, players and cameraman▲ 105Nov 9, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.TOR flair
Yup. Pack the paint and let Ingram take his contested hero ball shots while Scottie jacks off in the corner
Post · Derrick White talks about the time Joe Mazzulla let the players decide the starters, matchups, and game plan against the Raptors. Celtics won 112-96 without Jaylen Brown.▲ 90Mar 12, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.UTA flair
It amazes me how arrogant and entitled human beings can be. Not even a sorry from Ingram is pissweak and makes me think very lowly of him.
Post · [BrickCenter] Brandon Ingram Slams Water Bottle On Floor Splashing Floor Cleaner▲ 53Nov 9, 2025Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Brandon Ingram that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Brandon Ingram, his own Raptors fans are 37% negative, rival fans 43%, unflaired commenters 44%. Among the 2 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Raptors fans are hardest on him at 37% negative and Lakers fans kindest at 33% positive.

37.1%Own fansTOR flair · 1,189 comments

43.2%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,483 comments

44.0%Unflairedno flair · 1,447 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Brandon Ingram are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Brandon Ingram was talked about most on the front page: 1,336 of his 4,119 comments, −15 net sentiment against −20 across his season. His harshest room was the game threads, −36 on 27% of his comments; his warmest highlights, −4 on 14% of his comments. The game threads ran 21 points harsher than the front page: his play was graded live.

Game threads27% of his commentsHarshest53.116.91,123

Post-game threads11% of his comments43.324.3457

Front page32% of his comments36.821.31,336

Highlights14% of his commentsWarmest35.230.9579

News14% of his comments35.119.0578

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Brandon Ingram; left out here: Daily chat thread (28), Lowlights (8), Discussion posts (6), Injury posts (2). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Brandon Ingram ran between 24% and 55%. His worst week was the week of Apr 20, 61% negative of 849 comments; his best the week of Nov 17, 51% positive. 9 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Oct 6 · 25 comments, under the floor
- L vs DEN 108–112
- W @ SAC 130–122
Oct 13 · 26% negative · 18% positive · 39 comments
- L @ BOS 108–110
- W vs BKN 119–114
Oct 20 · 24% negative · 47% positive · 58 comments
- W @ ATL 138–118
- L vs MIL 116–122
- L @ DAL 129–139
Oct 27 · 17% negative · 27% positive · 30 comments
- L @ SAS 103–121
- L vs HOU 121–139
- W @ CLE 112–101
- W vs MEM 117–104
Nov 3 · 53% negative · 20% positive · 177 comments
- W vs MIL 128–100
- W @ ATL 109–97
- L @ PHI 120–130
Nov 10 · 38% negative · 18% positive · 45 comments
- W @ BKN 119–109
- W @ CLE 126–113
- W @ IND 129–111
Nov 17 · 13% negative · 51% positive · 169 comments
- W vs CHA 110–108
- W @ PHI 121–112
- W vs WAS 140–110
- W vs BKN 119–109
Nov 24 · 29% negative · 47% positive · 332 comments
- W vs CLE 110–99
- W vs IND 97–95
- L @ CHA 111–118
- L @ NYK 94–116
Dec 1 · 55% negative · 17% positive · 128 comments
- W vs POR 121–118
- L vs LAL 120–123
- L vs CHA 86–111
- L vs BOS 113–121
Dec 8 · 15% negative · 44% positive · 55 comments
- L vs NYK 101–117
Dec 15 · 23 comments, under the floor
- W @ MIA 106–96
- W @ MIL 111–105
- L vs BOS 96–112
- L @ BKN 81–96
Dec 22 · 50% negative · 17% positive · 36 comments
- W @ MIA 112–91
- L @ WAS 117–138
- W vs GSW 141–127
Dec 29 · 26% negative · 20% positive · 103 comments
- W vs ORL 107–106
- L vs DEN 103–106
- W vs ATL 134–117
Jan 5 · 17% negative · 35% positive · 46 comments
- W vs ATL 118–100
- W @ CHA 97–96
Jan 12 · 30% negative · 7% positive · 56 comments
- L vs PHI 102–115
- W @ IND 115–101
- L vs LAC 117–121
- L @ LAL 93–110
Jan 19 · 32% negative · 29% positive · 34 comments
- W @ GSW 145–127
- W @ SAC 122–109
- W @ POR 110–98
- W @ OKC 103–101
Jan 26 · 39% negative · 20% positive · 80 comments
- L vs NYK 92–119
- L @ ORL 120–130
- W vs UTA 107–100
Feb 2 · 30% negative · 25% positive · 80 comments
- L vs MIN 126–128
- W vs CHI 123–107
- W vs IND 122–104
Feb 9 · 38% negative · 32% positive · 210 comments
- L vs DET 95–113
Feb 16 · 29 comments, under the floor
- W @ CHI 110–101
- W @ MIL 122–94
Feb 23 · 60% negative · 8% positive · 52 comments
- L vs OKC 107–116
- L vs SAS 107–110
- W @ WAS 134–125
Mar 2 · 22 comments, under the floor
- L vs NYK 95–111
- L @ MIN 107–115
- W vs DAL 122–92
Mar 9 · 37% negative · 23% positive · 57 comments
- L @ HOU 99–113
- L @ NOP 111–122
- W vs PHX 122–115
- W vs DET 119–108
Mar 16 · 38% negative · 22% positive · 32 comments
- W @ CHI 139–109
- L @ DEN 115–121
- L @ PHX 98–120
Mar 23 · 47% negative · 9% positive · 32 comments
- L @ LAC 94–119
- W vs NOP 119–106
Mar 30 · 35% negative · 13% positive · 48 comments
- L @ DET 116–127
- W @ MEM 128–96
- L @ BOS 101–115
Apr 6 · 20% negative · 45% positive · 40 comments
- W vs MIA 121–95
- W vs MIA 128–114
- L @ NYK 95–112
- W vs BKN 136–101
Apr 13 · 34% negative · 28% positive · 134 comments
- L @ CLE 113–126
Apr 20 · 61% negative · 11% positive · 849 comments
- L @ CLE 105–115
- W vs CLE 126–104
- W vs CLE 93–89
Apr 27 · 43% negative · 13% positive · 366 comments
- L @ CLE 120–125

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Brandon Ingram in 11 of his 86 games, at least 20 comments each. It was warmer after losses: net sentiment −34 in losses (52% negative, 18% positive) against −35 in wins (54% negative, 19% positive), on a season net sentiment of −20.

−35In wins54% neg · 19% pos · 472 comments

−34In losses52% neg · 18% pos · 548 comments

−20His season42% neg · 21% pos · 4,119 comments

Games the room talked about Brandon Ingram in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 29R1 G5	R1 G5	@ CLEL 120–125	L 120–125	11	1	1	2	0-2	0-0	1	-2	1/1/2	3,719	17 points harsher than his season, from 171 comments.
Apr 26R1 G4	R1 G4	vs CLEW 93–89	W 93–89	36	23	6	0	6-23	3-7	1	+1	23/6/0	4,636	25 points harsher than his season, from 298 comments.
Apr 23R1 G3	R1 G3	vs CLEW 126–104	W 126–104	29	12	3	2	5-9	1-2	2	+15	12/3/2	1,997	37 points harsher than his season, from 113 comments.
Apr 20R1 G2	R1 G2	@ CLEL 105–115	L 105–115	36	7	4	3	3-15	1-3	5	-15	7/4/3	1,702	39 points harsher than his season, from 175 comments.
Apr 18R1 G1	R1 G1	@ CLEL 113–126	L 113–126	36	17	2	4	5-9	0-1	1	-19	17/2/4	3,600	17 points warmer than his season, from 80 comments.
Dec 31		vs DENL 103–106	L 103–106	36	30	8	1	11-21	5-7	1	-4	30/8/1	564	17 points warmer than his season, from 28 comments.
Dec 9		vs NYKL 101–117	L 101–117	39	31	6	6	11-18	3-5	3	-4	31/6/6	1,094	72 points warmer than his season, from 31 comments.
Dec 4		vs LALL 120–123	L 120–123	36	20	7	7	10-23	0-6	3	-3	20/7/7	1,979	26 points harsher than his season, from 39 comments.
Nov 29		@ CHAL 111–118	L 111–118	40	22	6	4	10-26	1-5	3	-11	22/6/4	293	42 points harsher than his season, from 24 comments.
Nov 26		vs INDW 97–95	W 97–95	38	26	8	0	11-23	1-4	3	+12	26/8/0	177	93 points warmer than his season, from 26 comments.