Brandin Podziemski · Court Sentiment

Verdict

41.0%37.2%21.8%

41.0%Negative130 comments

37.2%Neutral118 comments

21.8%Positive69 comments

−19Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=317 comments about Brandin PodziemskiUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Brandin Podziemski, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Podziemski is a piece of turd
Post · [Charania] San Antonio Spurs' Victor Wembanyama is likely to return for Saturday's NBA Cup semifinals against the Oklahoma City Thunder in Las Vegas, sources tell ESPN. Final clearance will come after today's practice for Wembanyama, who's been sidelined since Nov. 14 due to a calf strain.▲ 69Dec 12, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.GSW flair
however bad you think brandin podziemski is, he is so much worse
Post-game thread · UTA 117 @ GSW 134 · Nov 24▲ 38Nov 25, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.GSW flair
Podziemski incredible incompetence on the final possession.
Post-game thread · HOU 117 @ GSW 116 · Apr 5▲ 4Apr 6, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Brandin Podziemski that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Brandin Podziemski, his own Warriors fans are 36% negative, rival fans 47%, unflaired commenters 40%. Fewer than two fanbases have 200 comments about him, so no fanbase stands out.

35.6%Own fansGSW flair · 90 comments

47.1%Rival fansevery other flair · 102 comments

40.0%Unflairedno flair · 125 comments

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Brandin Podziemski are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Brandin Podziemski ran between 29% and 53%. His worst week was the week of Apr 13, 47% negative of 30 comments; his best the week of Apr 13, 17% positive. 39 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · no comments
- W vs LAL 111–103
Oct 6 · 2 comments, under the floor
- W vs POR 129–123
- L @ LAL 116–126
Oct 13 · 2 comments, under the floor
- W @ POR 118–111
- L vs LAC 103–106
Oct 20 · 4 comments, under the floor
- W @ LAL 119–109
- W vs DEN 137–131
- L @ POR 119–139
Oct 27 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 131–118
- W vs LAC 98–79
- L @ MIL 110–120
- L @ IND 109–114
Nov 3 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W vs PHX 118–107
- L @ SAC 116–121
- L @ DEN 104–129
- W vs IND 114–83
Nov 10 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L @ OKC 102–126
- W @ SAS 125–120
- W @ SAS 109–108
- W @ NOP 124–106
Nov 17 · 21 comments, under the floor
- L @ ORL 113–121
- L @ MIA 96–110
- L vs POR 123–127
Nov 24 · 11 comments, under the floor
- W vs UTA 134–117
- L vs HOU 100–104
- W vs NOP 104–96
Dec 1 · 16 comments, under the floor
- L vs OKC 112–124
- L @ PHI 98–99
- W @ CLE 99–94
- W @ CHI 123–91
Dec 8 · 10 comments, under the floor
- L vs MIN 120–127
- L @ POR 131–136
Dec 15 · 3 comments, under the floor
- L @ PHX 98–99
- W vs PHX 119–116
Dec 22 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W vs ORL 120–97
- W vs DAL 126–116
- L @ TOR 127–141
Dec 29 · 3 comments, under the floor
- W @ BKN 120–107
- W @ CHA 132–125
- L vs OKC 94–131
- W vs UTA 123–114
Jan 5 · 8 comments, under the floor
- L @ LAC 102–103
- W vs MIL 120–113
- W vs SAC 137–103
- L vs ATL 111–124
Jan 12 · 7 comments, under the floor
- W vs POR 119–97
- W vs NYK 126–113
- W vs CHA 136–116
Jan 19 · 8 comments, under the floor
- W vs MIA 135–112
- L vs TOR 127–145
- L @ DAL 115–123
- W @ MIN 111–85
Jan 26 · 25 comments, under the floor
- L @ MIN 83–108
- W @ UTA 140–124
- L vs DET 124–131
Feb 2 · 9 comments, under the floor
- L vs PHI 94–113
- W @ PHX 101–97
- L @ LAL 99–105
Feb 9 · 3 comments, under the floor
- W vs MEM 114–113
- L vs SAS 113–126
Feb 16 · 8 comments, under the floor
- L vs BOS 110–121
- W vs DEN 128–117
Feb 23 · 6 comments, under the floor
- L @ NOP 109–113
- W @ MEM 133–112
- L vs LAL 101–129
Mar 2 · 14 comments, under the floor
- L vs LAC 101–114
- W @ HOU 115–113
- L @ OKC 97–104
Mar 9 · 4 comments, under the floor
- L @ UTA 116–119
- L vs CHI 124–130
- L vs MIN 117–127
- L @ NYK 107–110
Mar 16 · 14 comments, under the floor
- W @ WAS 125–117
- L @ BOS 99–120
- L @ DET 101–115
- L @ ATL 110–126
Mar 23 · 5 comments, under the floor
- W @ DAL 137–131
- W vs BKN 109–106
- W vs WAS 131–126
- L @ DEN 93–116
Mar 30 · 9 comments, under the floor
- L vs SAS 113–127
- L vs CLE 111–118
- L vs HOU 116–117
Apr 6 · 21 comments, under the floor
- W vs SAC 110–105
- L vs LAL 103–119
- L @ SAC 118–124
- L @ LAC 110–115
Apr 13 · 47% negative · 17% positive · 30 comments
- W @ LAC 126–121
- L @ PHX 96–111

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Brandin Podziemski in 0 of his 89 games, at least 20 comments each. Too few graded games on one side to split wins from losses.

—In winstoo few graded wins

—In lossestoo few graded losses

−19His season41% neg · 22% pos · 317 comments

The room never reached 20 comments about Brandin Podziemski in one of his games.