Andrew Wiggins · Court Sentiment

Verdict

27.8%43.2%29.0%

27.8%Negative848 comments

43.2%Neutral1,314 comments

29.0%Positive883 comments

+1Net sentimentpositive minus negative

n=3,045 comments about Andrew WigginsUnofficial

Receipts

What the room said about Andrew Wiggins, verbatim: the highest-scoring comments in each class.

Exhibit 01Negative.no flair
Wiggins as a franchise player is also very kind to him. Over his career Wiggins has a negative BPM. His career on-off is +0.2. If he was picked late in the first rather than first overall nobody would even consider him being a franchise player. He's barely been an above average player over his career. Even in his all star year he was 96th in the league in WS/48, 84th in VORP and 88th in BPM. So at his very peak he was just about a top 100 player.
Post · Timberwolves Franchise Players on New Teams: 1) KG > Celtics, Champion. 2) Kevin Love > Cavs, Champion. 3) Andrew Wiggins > Warriors, Champion. 4) KAT > Knicks, Champion. 5) Naz “Naz Reid” Reid > Hornets, Champion?▲ 53Jun 26, 2026Source ↗
Exhibit 02Negative.no flair
Wiggins sold hard. Got outplayed by an 18 year old.
Post · [Highlight] Cooper Flagg in the clutch with a fadeaway, block on Wiggins, and a reverse layup. Timeout Miami▲ 20Dec 4, 2025Source ↗
Exhibit 03Negative.no flair
Wiggins is a bitch and hates playing for Canada
Post · [Koreen] Canada Basketball has announced that NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander will be among those playing for Canada this coming weekend (along with NAW, Brooks, Nembhard brothers)... Several players are with the team but won't play, including Dort, Mathurin, Barrett, Edey, Powell, Olynyk▲ 13Jun 29, 2026Source ↗

Method

A receipt is a top-scoring comment about Andrew Wiggins that cleared the classifier's confidence bar and a second pass confirming it is about him. No usernames: the site judges players, not commenters.

Fans

Of what r/NBA says about Andrew Wiggins, his own Heat fans are 13% negative, rival fans 28%, unflaired commenters 30%. Among the 3 fanbases with at least 200 comments, Thunder fans are hardest on him at 31% negative and Warriors fans kindest at 48% positive.

13.2%Own fansMIA flair · 212 comments

28.4%Rival fansevery other flair · 1,756 comments

29.8%Unflairedno flair · 1,077 comments

Who hates him most

Who defends him

Method

A fanbase is the flair its commenters wear. Flairs with fewer than 200 comments about Andrew Wiggins are left out of the lists; the tick is his rate across every flaired comment, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Rooms

Andrew Wiggins was talked about most on the front page: 1,371 of his 3,045 comments, −4 net sentiment against +1 across his season. His harshest room was the front page; his warmest highlights, +29 on 9% of his comments.

Game threads17% of his comments34.633.1529

Front page45% of his commentsHarshest28.625.11,371

Highlights9% of his commentsWarmest19.248.3265

News23% of his comments23.825.0697

Method

A room is the kind of post a comment sat under: a game thread, the front page, a highlight. A room is drawn when it holds at least 200 comments about Andrew Wiggins; left out here: Post-game threads (152), Daily chat thread (19), Lowlights (5), Discussion posts (4), Injury posts (1). The bar is the room's share of his comments, its split the room's sentiment. Harshest and warmest are by net sentiment, positive minus negative, from summed counts, never a mean of rates.

Timeline

Over 4-week windows, the negative share of comments about Andrew Wiggins ran between 17% and 46%. His worst week was the week of May 25, 58% negative of 102 comments; his best the week of Oct 20, 54% positive. 3 of 40 weeks had fewer than 30 comments and are left off the line.

Sep 29 · 18 comments, under the floor
- L vs ORL 118–126
Oct 6 · 41% negative · 19% positive · 32 comments
- L vs MIL 93–103
- L vs SAS 107–112
Oct 13 · 24 comments, under the floor
- L @ ATL 118–119
- L vs MEM 125–141
Oct 20 · 11% negative · 54% positive · 89 comments
- L @ ORL 121–125
- W @ MEM 146–114
- W vs NYK 115–107
Oct 27 · 13% negative · 40% positive · 60 comments
- W vs CHA 144–117
- L @ SAS 101–107
- L @ LAL 120–130
Nov 3 · 30% negative · 28% positive · 57 comments
- W @ LAC 120–119
- L @ DEN 112–122
- W vs CHA 126–108
- W vs POR 136–131
Nov 10 · 18% negative · 48% positive · 191 comments
- W vs CLE 140–138
- L vs CLE 116–130
- L @ NYK 132–140
Nov 17 · 23% negative · 33% positive · 43 comments
- W vs NYK 115–113
- W vs GSW 110–96
Nov 24 · 23% negative · 28% positive · 79 comments
- W vs MIL 106–103
- L vs DET 135–138
Dec 1 · 30% negative · 30% positive · 64 comments
- W vs LAC 140–123
- L @ DAL 108–118
- L @ ORL 105–106
- L vs SAC 111–127
Dec 8 · 35% negative · 28% positive · 81 comments
- L @ ORL 108–117
Dec 15 · 24% negative · 17% positive · 54 comments
- L vs TOR 96–106
- W @ BKN 106–95
- L @ NYK 125–132
Dec 22 · 24% negative · 33% positive · 58 comments
- L vs TOR 91–112
- W @ ATL 126–111
- W vs IND 142–116
Dec 29 · 44% negative · 21% positive · 63 comments
- W vs DEN 147–123
- W @ DET 118–112
- L vs MIN 115–125
- W vs NOP 125–106
Jan 5 · 34% negative · 26% positive · 35 comments
- L @ MIN 94–122
- L @ IND 99–123
- L @ OKC 112–124
Jan 12 · 22% negative · 41% positive · 74 comments
- W vs PHX 127–121
- L vs BOS 114–119
- W vs OKC 122–120
Jan 19 · 26% negative · 35% positive · 78 comments
- L @ GSW 112–135
- W @ SAC 130–117
- L @ POR 110–127
- W @ UTA 147–116
- W @ PHX 111–102
Jan 26 · 32% negative · 21% positive · 136 comments
- L vs ORL 124–133
- W @ CHI 116–113
- L vs CHI 118–125
- W vs CHI 134–91
Feb 2 · 19% negative · 30% positive · 116 comments
- L @ BOS 96–98
- W @ WAS 132–101
Feb 9 · 40% negative · 16% positive · 77 comments
- L vs UTA 111–115
Feb 16 · 29% negative · 29% positive · 31 comments
- W @ ATL 128–97
- W vs MEM 136–120
Feb 23 · 44% negative · 18% positive · 66 comments
- L @ MIL 117–128
- L @ PHI 117–124
- W vs HOU 115–105
Mar 2 · 44% negative · 15% positive · 34 comments
- W vs BKN 124–98
- W vs BKN 126–110
Mar 23 · 29% negative · 18% positive · 34 comments
- L vs SAS 111–136
- W @ CLE 120–103
- L @ CLE 128–149
- L @ IND 118–135
Mar 30 · 30% negative · 18% positive · 33 comments
- W vs PHI 119–109
- L vs BOS 129–147
- W vs WAS 152–136
Apr 6 · 34% negative · 29% positive · 35 comments
- L @ TOR 95–121
- L @ TOR 114–128
- W @ WAS 140–117
- W vs ATL 143–117
Apr 13 · 19% negative · 51% positive · 180 comments
- L @ CHA 126–127

Method

Lines are 4-week rolling rates from summed counts (Σ negative ÷ Σ comments), drawn only where the window holds at least 30 comments. Dots are single weeks, sized by n. Bands follow the season calendar.

Games

The room talked about Andrew Wiggins in 2 of his 74 games, at least 20 comments each. It was warmer after losses: net sentiment +47 in losses (15% negative, 62% positive) against +18 in wins (27% negative, 45% positive), on a season net sentiment of +1.

+18In wins27% neg · 45% pos · 22 comments

+47In losses15% neg · 62% pos · 98 comments

+1His season28% neg · 29% pos · 3,045 comments

Games the room talked about Andrew Wiggins in, at least 20 comments each, newest first.
Date	Phase	Opp	Result	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast	FG	3P	TOV	+/−	P/R/A	Comments	Verdict
Apr 14Play-in	Play-in	@ CHAL 126–127	L 126–127	42	27	7	3	10-18	4-8	0	-6	27/7/3	10,190	46 points warmer than his season, from 98 comments.
Jan 17		vs OKCW 122–120	W 122–120	32	15	5	5	6-15	2-5	0	+4	15/5/5	715	17 points warmer than his season, from 22 comments.